Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/442,170

RADIATING ELEMENTS HAVING DIPOLE ARMS WITH CLOAKED DIELECTRIC LOADING ELEMENTS AND BASE STATION ANTENNAS INCLUDING SUCH RADIATING ELEMENTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Examiner
PHAN, THO GIA
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Outdoor Wireless Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
930 granted / 1017 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1045
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§102
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restriction Applicant’s arguments, filed 10/21/25, with respect to a restriction requirement of claims 1-2, 4, 7-9, 11-13, 18-21, 23-24, 27-28 and 30-31 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, claims 1-2, 4, 7-9, 11-13, 18-21, 23-24, 27-28 and 30-31 are now pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 23, 28 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. In claim 23, line 4, the language, “the second dielectric block” lacks an antecedent basis. In claim 23, line 4, the language, “the reflector” lacks an antecedent basis. In claim 23, line 6, the language, “the third dielectric block” lacks an antecedent basis. In claim 23, line 6, the language, “the reflector” lacks an antecedent basis. In claim 23, line 8, the language, “the fourth dielectric block” lacks an antecedent basis. In claim 23, line 8, the language, “the reflector” lacks an antecedent basis. In claim 30, line 1, the language, “the first through fourth dipole arms” lacks an antecedent basis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 4, 7-9, 11-13, 18-21, 24, 27 and 31 are allowed. Claims 23, 28 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, but would be allowable if overcome the above rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The patents to Frenkel, Zhang, Sone, Tanaka and Leisten are cited as of interested and illustrated a similar structure to a base station antenna. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO GIA PHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1826. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8-430). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached on (571) 270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /THO G PHAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603438
QUASI-HELICAL ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603437
ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597703
VEHICULAR ANTENNA DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595380
RFID SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592495
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MITIGATING INTERFERENCE FROM SATELLITE GATEWAY ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month