Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/443,243

MULTI-WAVELENGTH POLARIZATION DIVERSIFIED OPTICAL RECEIVER CONFIGURATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Examiner
CONNELLY, MICHELLE R
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Amd
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
828 granted / 1036 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1061
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1036 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 30, 2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant’s Amendment filed June 30, 2026 has been fully considered and entered. Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 10-14, and 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fini et al. (US 2023/0251440 A1). Regarding claims 1-7; Optical receiver circuitry (Polarization Diverse Receiver with Delays, see title; receiver 300; see Figure 3) comprising: a polarization diversifier (300) configured to: receive an input optical signal (154; see Figure 3 and paragraph 71); output a first component (optical signal 159 at first optical output 156C) of the input optical signal (154) into a first end (157B) of a looped optical path (157; optical data bus 157 is implemented as an optical waveguide and has a continuous loop-like structure; see paragraph 71; see Figure 3); and output a second component (optical signal 158 at second optical output 157A) of the input optical signal (154) into a second end (157A) of the looped optical path (157); a first add-drop ring resonator filter (ring resonator 301-1; see Figure 3 and paragraph 72) disposed in the optical path (157); a first photodetector circuit (305-1); a first waveguide (303A-1 / 303B-1) configured to transmit the first component (159 /309-1) from the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1) to the first photodetector circuit (305-1), the first waveguide (303A-1 / 303B-1) having a first length (short section; see paragraph 74); and a second waveguide (303A-1 / 303 C-1) configured to transmit the second component (158 / 307-1) from the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1) to the first photodetector circuit (305-1), the second waveguide (303A-1 / 303C-1) having a second length (long section; see paragraph 74) that is greater than the first length; wherein the first component (159) and the second component (158) propagate in opposite directions along the looped optical path (157; arrows 158 and 159 represent optical signals propagating in opposite directions within looped optical path 157; see paragraphs 70 and 71; see Figure 3); wherein the second length (long section; see paragraph 74) is greater than the first length (short section; see paragraph 74) to compensate for the second component (158) reaching the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1; see Figure 3) before the first component (159) reaches the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1; see paragraphs 47 and 70; prescribed optical signal time delays magnitudes provide for effective timing differential compensation for different polarization components (TE and TM); optical signals timing delays are configured to ensure that the corresponding portions of the two split optical input signals, which are traveling in opposite directions, arrive at a given photodetector at substantially the same time); wherein the first component includes a quasi-transverse-electric mode (TE; see paragraph 51) and the second component includes a quasi-transverse-magnetic mode (TM; see paragraph 51); wherein the polarization diversifier (300) includes at least one of a polarization splitter and rotator (PSR 156; see paragraph 70) or a polarization splitting grating coupler (see paragraphs 44 and 51); further comprising a waveguide delay line (Delay 315) in the optical path (157); further comprising: a second add-drop ring resonator filter (301-2) disposed in the optical path (157); a second photodetector circuit (305-2); a third waveguide (303A-2 / 303 B-2) configured to transmit the first component (159 / 309-2) from the second add-drop ring resonator filter (301-2) to the second photodetector circuit (305-2); and a fourth waveguide (303A-2 / 303 C-2) configured to transmit the second component (158) from the second add-drop ring resonator filter (301-2) to the second photodetector circuit (305-2); wherein the third waveguide (303A-2 / 303 B-2) has a third length that is equal to the first length (303A-1 / 303 B-1); wherein the fourth waveguide (303A-2 / 303 C-2) has a length that is greater than the first length (303A-1 / 303 B-1) and less than the second length (303A-1 / 303 C-1). Regarding claims 10-14 and 16; Fini et al. discloses a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) receiver (see Figure 3) comprising: a polarization diversifier (300) configured to: receive an input optical signal (154); output a first component (159) of the input optical signal (154) into a first end (157-B) of a looped optical path (157); and output a second component (158) of the input optical signal (154) into a second end (157-A) of the looped optical path (154); a first channel (λ1, 311-1) extending out from the looped optical path (157), the first channel comprising: a first waveguide (303A-1 / 303 B-1) configured to transmit the first component (159) through the first channel (λ1, 311-1) to a first photodetector circuit (305-1); and a second waveguide (303A-1 / 303C-1) configured to transmit the second component (158) through the first channel (λ1, 311-1) to the first photodetector circuit (305-1), the second waveguide including a waveguide delay line (the longer section 303C-1 forms a delay line); and a second channel (λ2, 311-2) extending out from the looped optical path (157), the second channel (λ2, 311-2) comprising: a third waveguide (303A-2 / 303B-2) configured to transmit the first component (159) through the second channel (λ2, 311-2) to a second photodetector circuit (305-2); and a fourth waveguide (303A-2 / 303C-2) configured to transmit the second component (158) through the second channel (λ2, 311-2) to the second photodetector circuit (305-2); wherein the first component (159) and the second component (158) propagate in opposite directions along the looped optical path (157; arrows 158 and 159 represent optical signals propagating in opposite directions within looped optical path 157; see paragraphs 70 and 71; see Figure 3); and wherein the waveguide delay line (longer section 303C-1) is configured to compensate for the second component (158) reaching the first channel (311-1) before the first component (159) reaches the first channel (311-1; see paragraphs 47 and 70; prescribed optical signal time delays magnitudes provide for effective timing differential compensation for different polarization components (TE and TM); optical signals timing delays are configured to ensure that the corresponding portions of the two split optical input signals, which are traveling in opposite directions, arrive at a given photodetector at substantially the same time); further comprising an add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1) of the first channel (λ1, 311-1), the first waveguide and the second waveguide coupled to the add-drop ring resonator filter (see Figure 3); wherein the first component includes a quasi-transverse-electric mode (TE) and the second component includes a quasi-transverse-magnetic mode (TM; see paragraph 51); wherein the polarization diversifier (300) includes at least one of a polarization splitter and rotator (PSR 156; see paragraph 70) or a polarization splitting grating coupler (see paragraphs 44 and 51); further comprising an additional waveguide delay line (Delay 315) included in the looped optical path (157); further comprising an additional a waveguide delay line (303 C-2; the longer section of waveguide forms a delay line) included in the fourth waveguide. Regarding claims 17-20; Fini A method (see Figure 3) comprising: receiving an input optical signal (154); splitting the input optical signal (154) into a first component (159) and a second component (158); guiding the first component (159) into a first end (157B) of an optical path (157); guiding the second component (158) into a second end (157A) of the optical path (157); transmitting the first component (159) through an add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1) disposed in the optical path (157) and into a first waveguide (303A-1 / 303B-1) having a first length; transmitting the second component (158) through the add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1) and into a second waveguide (303A-1 / 303C-1) having a second length that is greater than the first length (see Figure 3); transmitting the first component (159) through the first waveguide to a photodetector circuit (305-1); and transmitting the second component (158) through the second waveguide to the photodetector circuit (305-1); wherein the first component (159) and the second component (158) propagate in opposite directions along the looped optical path (157; arrows 158 and 159 represent optical signals propagating in opposite directions within looped optical path 157; see paragraphs 70 and 71; see Figure 3); wherein the second length (long section; see paragraph 74) is greater than the first length (short section; see paragraph 74) to compensate for the second component (158) reaching the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1; see Figure 3) before the first component (159) reaches the first add-drop ring resonator filter (158; see paragraphs 47 and 70; prescribed optical signal time delays magnitudes provide for effective timing differential compensation for different polarization components (TE and TM); optical signals timing delays are configured to ensure that the corresponding portions of the two split optical input signals, which are traveling in opposite directions, arrive at a given photodetector at substantially the same time); wherein the first component includes a quasi-transverse-electric mode and the second component includes a quasi-transverse-magnetic mode (TE and TM; see paragraph 51); wherein the input optical signal (154) is split into the first component (159) and the second component (158) using a polarization diversifier (300); further comprising delaying (at delay 315) transmission of the second component through the optical path (157). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8, 9, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fini et al. (US 2023/0251440 A1). Regarding claims 8 and 9; Fini et al. discloses a waveguide delay line (315) in the optical path, but fails to specifically disclose that the third waveguide has a third length that is equal to the second length, however before the effective filing date of the present invention, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to reverse the orientation of the waveguides to provide the third waveguide having a third length that is equal to the second length for the purpose of orienting the waveguide in a desired manner, since this would not appear to produce any novel or unexpected results and is considered to be within the level of ordinary skill in the art. Regarding claim 15; before the effective filing date of the present invention, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to provide an additional a waveguide delay line included in the third waveguide for the purpose of providing a desired optical output with optimal delays. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed June 19, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that claim 1 has been amended to recite a specific reason why the second length is greater than the first length, in particular, the second length is greater because the second component reaches the first add-drop ring resonator filter before the first component reaches the same add-drop ring resonator. The examiner notes that Fini discloses that the second length (long section; see paragraph 74) is greater than the first length (short section; see paragraph 74) to compensate for the second component (158) reaching the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1; see Figure 3) before the first component (159) reaches the first add-drop ring resonator filter (301-1; see paragraphs 47 and 70; prescribed optical signal time delays magnitudes provide for effective timing differential compensation for different polarization components (TE and TM); optical signals timing delays are configured to ensure that the corresponding portions of the two split optical input signals, which are traveling in opposite directions, arrive at a given photodetector at substantially the same time). In response to applicant's argument, the examiner further notes that a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Paragraphs 47 and 70 of Fini disclose the claimed timing relationship. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE R CONNELLY whose telephone number is (571)272-2345. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9 AM to 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at 571-272-2397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE R CONNELLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742925
HOLLOW-CORE OPTICAL FIBERS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742939
MOLDED OPTICAL CONNECTORS WITH ZERO-DRAFT MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT FEATURES
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736766
SPLICE CLOSURE WITH HIGH-DENSITY SPLICE CASSETTES
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724319
SYSTEM AND METHODS OF VISIBLE LIGHT SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717079
DE BRUIJN SWITCH
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1036 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month