Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/446,821

APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED POSITIONING SUPPORTED BY POSITIONING REFERENCE UNITS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Priority
Jul 19, 2023 — CN 202310884934.5
Examiner
CUMMING, WILLIAM D
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
913 granted / 1016 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1049
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1016 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of restriction of invention in the reply filed on January 19, 2026 is acknowledged. Applicant is reminded that upon the cancelation of claims to a non-elected invention, the inventorship must be corrected in compliance with 37 CFR 1.48(a) if one or more of the currently named inventors is no longer an inventor of at least one claim remaining in the application. A request to correct inventorship under 37 CFR 1.48(a) must be accompanied by an application data sheet in accordance with 37 CFR 1.76 that identifies each inventor by his or her legal name and by the processing fee required under 37 CFR 1.17(i). Claim Interpretation Under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the “or” language, the condition would also not occur and the step or function claimed would never be realized, hence the claim does not require to perform the step or function. See Ex parte Katz, 2011 WL 514314, at 4-5 (BPAI Jan. 27, 2011, 2011 WL 1211248 at 2 (BPAI Mar. 25, 2011); see also In re Johnston, 435 f.3d 1381, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2006)( "optional elements do not narrow the claim because they can always be omitted”). “Or” conditions are not limitations against which prior art must be found. Under the broadest scenario, the steps or functions dependent on the “or” condition would not be invoked, and such, the Examiner is not required to find these limitations in the prior art in order to render the claim anticipated. In re Am. Acad. Of Sci. Tech Ctr., 367 f.3d 1359, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2004). The term “positioning information” is any data or information for use for positioning anything. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-11 and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 8-11 and 18-23 depend on claim 0. First, there is no claim 0. Second, claims must start at 1, hence there cannot be claim 0. For compact prosecution purposes only, the Examiner will take these claims to depend on claims 7, 8, 9. Applicant’s attorney must correct these claims in the next response. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by United States Patent Application Publication 2021/0367657 (Chen, et al). Chen, et al discloses an apparatus (figure 11), comprising one or more processors (#1102) and one or more memories (#1101) storing instructions of a repository function of a cellular network (figure 1, ¶3, 45, 46, 10, 127, 158, 167-169 etc.). The instructions, when executed by the one or more processors (#1102) , cause the apparatus to perform operations, the operations comprising receiving, from a positioning reference unit (figure 2, #UE) of a cellular network (figure 1), positioning information for the positioning reference unit (#UE), the positioning information indicating, a position of the positioning reference unit (#UE) in the cellular network (figure 1, #S205, S211, ¶79-103). Storing the information for the positioning reference unit (#1101, #S206-S208) and in response to receiving, from a network element of the cellular network (#S203, ¶76), a request for positioning information of the positioning reference unit (#UE), sending positioning information for the positioning reference unit (#UE) to the network element (¶4, 18, 75, 89, 102, etc.) PNG media_image1.png 205 508 media_image1.png Greyscale The Examiner has cited particular columns and/or line/paragraphs numbers in the reference(s) applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. IN RE JUNG, No. 10-1019 (Fed. Cir. 2011). PNG media_image2.png 689 453 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Claims 8-11 and 18-23 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion If applicants wish to request for an interview, an "Applicant Initiated Interview Request" form (PTOL-413A) should be submitted to the examiner prior to the interview in order to permit the examiner to prepare in advance for the interview and to focus on the issues to be discussed. This form should identify the participants of the interview, the proposed date of the interview, whether the interview will be personal, telephonic, or video conference, and should include a brief description of the issues to be discussed. A copy of the completed "Applicant Initiated Interview Request" form should be attached to the Interview Summary form, PTOL-413 at the completion of the interview and a copy should be given to applicant or applicant's representative. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM D CUMMING whose telephone number is (571)272-7861. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 12 noon to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony S. Addy can be reached at (571) 272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WILLIAM D. CUMMING Primary Examiner Art Unit 2645 /WILLIAM D CUMMING/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672186
NETWORK ALLOCATION VECTOR (NAV) OPERATION IN MULTI-ACCESS POINT (AP) COORDINATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672058
ADAPTIVE CELL SELECTION, RESELECTION AND MOBILITY ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666246
Multi-SIM Device Handling via Entitlement Server
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659400
CONTROL INSTRUCTION METHOD, BEHAVIOR CONTROL METHOD, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652288
Systems and Methods for Communication Control in a Restricted Environment
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+5.7%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1016 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month