Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/448,917

METHOD OF FABRICATING MEMORY DEVICES INCLUDING B-SITE DOPANTS AND LOGIC DEVICES THROUGH WAFER BONDING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 12, 2023
Examiner
PHAM, THANHHA S
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kepler Computing Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
742 granted / 872 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
894
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 872 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6, 8, 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. ► With respect to claim 1, Lines 4-6, “the capacitor comprising a non-linear polar dielectric material having form ABC, wherein A and B are two different cations and O is Oxygen or Nitrogen, wherein B is combined with a dopant” renders the claim indefinite. It is not clear how “O is Oxygen or Nitrogen” while ” a non-linear polar dielectric material having form ABC” . *** Suggestion: change “O” to “C” ►` With respect to claim 4, Lines 1-2, “wherein the first conductive layer comprises a first refractory metal, nitrides of the first refractory metal, or platinum, iridium, or palladium…” should be changed to “ wherein the first conductive layer comprises a first refractory metal, nitrides of the first refractory metal, platinum, iridium, or palladium” for a better claimed language. ► With respect to claim 8, Lines 1-2, “wherein the first conductive layer comprises a first refractory metal, nitrides of the first refractory metal, or platinum, iridium, or palladium” should be changed to “wherein the first conductive layer comprises a first refractory metal, nitrides of the first refractory metal, platinum, iridium, or palladium” for a better claimed language. ► With respect to claim 19, Claim 19 further recites “further comprising a third transistor adjacent to the first transistor, wherein a first terminal of the third transistor is coupled with a second terminal of the first transistor by a conductive structure, and wherein the conductive structure is vertically between the plate electrode and the first transistor” but does not cite how such claimed elements (a third transistor, a first terminal of the third transistor is coupled with a second terminal of the first transistor by a conductive structure, the conductive structure is vertically between the plate electrode and the first transistor) are formed as depending on process of claim 18. ► With respect to claim 20, It is not clear how a signal electrode is formed laterally between the first capacitor and the second capacitor wherein the signal electrode is coupled with the plate electrode as being dependent to process of claim 18. ► With respect to claim 21, Line 2, it is not clear where a third conductive layer is deposited Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 9-18 are allowed. Claims 1-6 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 8, 19-21 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANHHA S PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1696. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Partridge can be reached at 571-270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANHHA S PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604730
CHIP PACKAGING STRUCTURE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604490
MEMORY DEVICE HAVING A CONTAINER-SHAPED ELECTRODE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598885
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575456
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563938
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 872 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month