Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/448,989

DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 14, 2023
Examiner
CAMPBELL, SHAUN M
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
742 granted / 1025 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1072
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A (Figures 6-7) in the reply filed on 12/2/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-5 and 8-12 are elected for examination, and claims 6-7 and 13-17 are withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 8-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Choung et al. (US Pub. No. 2022/0077251 A1), hereafter referred to as Choung. As to claim 1, Choung discloses a display device ([0021]) comprising: a rib (fig 2, 126) including an aperture (fig 1C, aperture 124a) and an upper surface (upper surface of 126); a partition (fig 2, 110) arranged on the upper surface of the rib (upper surface of 126); a first electrode (104) overlapping with the aperture (124a); an organic layer (112) including a first end portion located on the upper surface (fig 2, end of 112 on upper surface of 126), and covering the first electrode (104); a second electrode (114) including a second end portion located on the upper surface (end of 114 on upper surface of 126), and covering the organic layer (112); a first inorganic layer (202; [0033]) arranged on the rib (126); and a second inorganic layer (116; [0034]) covering the partition (110), the second electrode (114), and the first inorganic layer (202), wherein at least a part of the first inorganic layer (202) is located between the first end portion (end of 112 on upper surface of 126) and the partition (110) and is in contact with the second inorganic layer (116). As to claim 2, Choung discloses the display device of claim 1 (paragraphs above), wherein the second end portion (end portion of 114) is located between the first end portion (end portion of 112) and the first inorganic layer (202). As to claim 3, Choung discloses the display device of claim 1 (paragraphs above), wherein the partition (110) is in contact with the upper surface of the rib (upper surface of 126), and the first inorganic layer (202) is located between the first end portion (end portion of 112) and the partition (110). As to claim 4, Choung discloses the display device of claim 3 (paragraphs above), wherein the first inorganic layer (202) has a frame shape surrounding the aperture in plan view (fig 1C, shows the surrounding of aperture 124A). As to claim 5, Choung discloses the display device of claim 1 (paragraphs above), wherein the partition (110) is arranged on the first inorganic layer (202). As to claim 8, Choung discloses the display device of claim 1 (paragraphs above), wherein the partition (110) includes a first portion having a first width (110B), and a second portion having a second width (110A) smaller than the first width (width of 110B), and the second portion (110A) is located between the first portion (110B) and the rib (126). As to claim 9, Choung discloses the display device of claim 1 (paragraphs above), a power supply line (222) arranged on the rib (126), wherein the second electrode (114) is in contact with the power supply line (222). As to claim 10, Choung discloses the display device of claim 9 (paragraphs above), wherein the power supply line (222) is located between the first inorganic layer (202) and the first end portion (end portion of 112), on the upper surface of the rib (upper surface of 126). As to claim 11, Choung discloses the display device of claim 10 (paragraphs above), wherein the power supply line (222) has a frame shape surrounding the aperture in plan view (aperture 124A). As to claim 12, Choung discloses the display device of claim 9 (paragraphs above), wherein the first inorganic layer (202) covers a part of the power supply line (222). Pertinent Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 12,120,938B2; and US 2012/0228603A1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAUN M CAMPBELL whose telephone number is (571)270-3830. The examiner can normally be reached on MWFS: 7:30-6pm Thurs 1-2pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Purvis, Sue can be reached at (571)272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAUN M CAMPBELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893 12/23/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604764
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604614
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598900
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593597
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588387
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month