Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/449,680

COMPOSITE CERAMIC SUBSTRATE HAVING MULTI-LAYER CONFIGURATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 14, 2023
Examiner
KHAN, TAHSEEN
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tong Hsing Electronic Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
564 granted / 924 resolved
-4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
968
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 4, 5, 12, 13, and 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected product, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/1/25. Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1-3, 6-11, 14, and 15 in the reply filed on 12/1/25 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 9-11, 14, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sasaki WO_9854761_A1 (see machine English translation). 1. Regarding Claim 9, Sasaki discloses a ceramic structure with stacked layers (paragraphs 0005, 0023). Sasaki teaches using nitride ceramic substrate (corresponds to claimed nitride ceramic core layer) with a thickness that is thick enough for mechanical strength ([0070]). This seemingly indicates a pre-determined thickness. Sasaki discloses using a high melting metal layer that comprises silica oxide which is in the form of covering paste layer (corresponds to claimed ceramic covering layer) that can be applied to almost the entire surface of said nitride ceramic substrate and then jointly sintered (paragraph 0122). The fact that it can be applied to almost the entirety of the nitride ceramic substrate (corresponds to claimed nitride ceramic core layer) suggests that it overlaps with more than 80% of an area of one of the two ceramic surfaces of the nitride ceramic substrate layer, as is being claimed in independent Claim 9. Sasaki further discloses that the thickness of said silica oxide-based covering layer paste (corresponds to claimed ceramic covering layer) can be about 20 microns while the nitride ceramic substrate can be 0.7 mm (paragraph 0124); thereby meeting the limitation of the two ceramic covering layers being less than or equal to the predetermined thickness of the nitride ceramic substrate. 2. However, Sasaki does not seem to disclose having said silica oxide-based covering layer paste (corresponds to claimed ceramic covering layer) on both sides of its nitride ceramic substrate (corresponds to claimed nitride ceramic core layer) in a single, exemplified embodiment. 3. Sasaki does disclose in what seems to be a lesser preferred embodiment, to stack layers on both sides of said nitride ceramic substrate (corresponds to claimed nitride ceramic core layer) (paragraph 0058). Although Sasaki does not explicitly state any particular advantage of placing the corresponding ceramic cover layer on both sides of its nitride ceramic substrate, the Examiner respectfully submits that it would have been obvious to try this embodiment for having improved bonding strength on both sides since Sasaki does suggest that in general, the layer does provide bonding strength (paragraph 0015) and relieve thermal stress (paragraph 0019). 4. Regarding Claim 10, Sasaki discloses using Si3N4 layer as its nitride substrate core layer (paragraph 0007) and AlN for its ceramic covering layer (paragraph 0009). 5. Regarding Claim 11, Sasaki discloses using a copper conducting layer formed on said silica-oxide based ceramic covering layer (Abstract). 6. Regarding Claim 14, Sasaki discloses the claimed thickness as stated above along with the use of differing materials and symmetrical coatings on both sides of said substrate above. 7. Regarding Claim 15, Sasaki also discloses that said nitride ceramic substrate layer can be AlN (paragraph 0009). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 6-8 are allowable. The applied art as well as prior art in general does not disclose or suggest having two composite layers formed on both ceramic surfaces of the nitride ceramic core layer, that comprise the material of the ceramic covering layers as well as the material of the nitride ceramic core layer, all within the overall embodiment of Claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAHSEEN KHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1140. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays-Saturdays 08:00AM-10:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 5712701547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAHSEEN KHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781 March 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600108
Core and Shell Composite Structural Member
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599187
ARTICLE WITH ADAPTIVE VENTILATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600879
COATED LENS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589556
PULTRUDED FIBRE-REINFORCED STRIP FOR A REINFORCED STRUCTURE, SUCH AS A SPAR CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589576
Laminated Glazing and Process
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+22.4%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month