Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/450,061

RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 15, 2023
Priority
Nov 03, 2022 — FI 20225989
Examiner
KAYAL, DAVID M
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
39 granted / 46 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
74
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
94.6%
+54.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 46 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment filed on December 11, 2025, has been entered. Claims 1-20 are presently pending with claims 1, 13, and 20 being independent. Claims 2, 12, and 14 are original claims. Claims 1, 3-11, 13, and 15-20 are currently amended. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-12, filed December 11, 2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 13, and 20 under 35 U.S.C. §102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 U.S.C. §103. Refer to updated rejection of claims 1-20 below in view of amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-7, 9, 11-17, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2023/0209606 A1; hereinafter Zhang) in view of Li et al. (US 2015/0016312 A1; hereinafter Li). Regarding claim 1, Zhang teaches an apparatus (read as UE) comprising at least one processor (Fig. 12, element 1202 Processor; ¶ [0135] UE may include a processor.), and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform (Fig. 12, element 1202 Processor, element 1204 Memory, element 1206 Instructions; ¶ [0135] The UE may include a memory.; ¶ [0137] The memory may store instructions. The instructions may include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations.): transmitting the first message with repetitions over the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0083] A random access preamble transmission scheme using multiple ROs. Each of the PRACH preamble sequences correspond to the same PRACH preamble sequence. The UE transmits four repetitions of the PRACH preamble sequence.; ¶ [0085] Transmit a MSG1 using multiple ROs.); generating a random access - radio network temporary identifier (RA-RNTI) based on the determined RO sequence (read as a function of the multiple ROs) of the multiple ROs, wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to use identification information of a last RO of the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0064] A set of rules may be defined for determining RA-RNTI(s).; ¶ [0066] Determine whether to determine a single RA-RNTI or multiple RA-RNTIs for the multiple ROs. The set of rules may specify a new function for determining an RA-RNTI for the multiple ROs. The UE may determine a single RA-RNTI as a function of the multiple ROs.; ¶ [0121] The new formulation may be a function of each RO of the multiple ROs. The new function can be denoted as F(RO1, RO2, …, RO_K), where K is the latest RO in the multiple ROs.; ¶ [0122] S_id represents the index of the first OFDM symbol of an RO. T_id represents the index of the first slot of the RO. F_id represents the index of the RO in the frequency domain. The RO may be an earliest RO, a latest RO, or any RO within the multiple ROs.); and using the generated RA-RNTI in the random access procedure (¶ [0006] Monitoring for a random access response (RAR) message based on the one or more determined RA-RNTIs in a RAR window associated with the multiple ROs.). Zhang does not explicitly teach determining a random access channel occasion (RO) sequence of multiple ROs from multiple candidate RO sequences of multiple ROs for transmission of a first message with repetitions in the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs, wherein the first message is part of a random access procedure. In analogous art, Li teaches teach determining a random access channel occasion (RO) sequence of multiple ROs from multiple candidate RO sequences of multiple ROs for transmission of a first message with repetitions in the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs, wherein the first message is part of a random access procedure (¶ [0005] In response to receiving the SIB, the UE determines a first number of repetitions for a transmission of a RA preamble, a corresponding first resource set, and a corresponding first maximum number of transmissions.; ¶ [0120] Signaling in a SIB, linking sets of path-loss ranges to sets of respective resources for a RA preamble transmission. Each number of repetitions can have an associated PRACH resource configuration.; ¶ [0122] The UE determines a PRACH resource configuration from the acquired mapping.¶ [0131] Table1B provides an exemplary RA preamble resource (time, or frequency, or preamble domain) adjustment according to a number of repetitions for a transmission for a RA preamble.; ¶ [0132] In Table 1B, different resource configurations can be mapped according to a number of RA preamble repetitions. PNG media_image1.png 313 678 media_image1.png Greyscale ). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine transmission of a first message with repetitions as taught by Li with random access procedure as taught by Zhang. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve random access reliability and reduce failed access attempts by transmitting the first random access message with repetitions over configured random access occasions so that the receiving base station has a greater likelihood of detecting the message and responding successfully (Li: ¶ [0005]). Regarding claim 2, Zhang teaches wherein using the generated RA-RNTI comprises detecting downlink control information with cyclic redundancy check scrambled by the generated RA-RNTI (¶ [0061] The BS may transmit UL and/or DL scheduling grants to the UE via a PDCCH. The scheduling grants may be transmitted in the form of DL control information (DCI).; ¶ [0076] In some aspects, the PDCCH includes DCI including a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) masked by the RA-RNTI (e.g., by scrambling the CRC with the RA-RNTI).; ¶ [0096] The UE may apply a first mask to a CRC in a detected PDCCH using the RA-RNTI.). Regarding claim 3, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use an identifier of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0004] The RA-RNTI may be dependent on the time and/or frequency resource locations (e.g., time and/or frequency resource indexes) of the random access resource.; ¶ [0071] The random access ID can be derived based on the frequency-time resource used. There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.; ¶ [0122] Computing an RA-RNTI for multiple ROs.). Regarding claim 4, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI (read as computing an RA-RNTI) is configured to further use a time domain parameter t_id as an identifier of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0122] The new function for computing an RA-RNTI for multiple ROs can be defined as: PNG media_image2.png 40 369 media_image2.png Greyscale t_id represents the index.). Regarding claim 5, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use identification information of one or more of the multiple ROs belonging to the RO sequence (¶ [0045] A new function for computing RA-RNTI may be defined based on time and/or frequency locations of each RO of the multiple ROs.; ¶ [0071] There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.). Regarding claim 6, Zhang teaches wherein the identification information comprises a time domain identifier of a the last RO of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0071] The random access ID for a particular sent random access preamble can be derived based on the frequency-time resource used. There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.; ¶ [0076] The RA-RNTI may be a function of the time and/or frequency resource of the RO.; ¶ [0122] A function for computing RA-RNTI for multiple ROs shows that t_id represents the index of the first slot symbol of the RO in a system frame.). Regarding claim 7, Zhang teaches wherein the generation of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use a sum of the identification information of the multiple ROs in the RO sequence (¶ [0122] PNG media_image2.png 40 369 media_image2.png Greyscale Where s_id represents the index of the first OFDM symbol of an RO within the multiple ROs, t_id represents the index of the first slot symbol of the RO in a system frame, f_id represents the index of the RO in the frequency domain, and ul_carrier_id represents the UL carrier used for the random access preamble transmission.). Regarding claim 9, Zhang teaches wherein the identification information comprises frequency domain identifier of the last RO of the multiple ROs in the RO sequence (¶ [0071] The random access ID can be derived based on the frequency-time resource. There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs.; ¶ [0076] The RA-RNTI may be a function of the time and/or frequency resource of the RO.; ¶ [0122] f_id represents the index of the RO in the frequency domain.). Regarding claim 11, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use identification information of at least one of a first (read as earliest) RO of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0071] There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.; ¶ [0095] The UE may determine an RA-RNTI for each RO based on the corresponding RO.; ¶ [0122] PNG media_image2.png 40 369 media_image2.png Greyscale The RO may be an earliest RO, a latest RO, or any RO within the multiple ROs.). Regarding claim 12, Zhang teaches wherein the random access procedure is contention based random access, CBRA (¶ [0038] The self-contained integrated subframe supports communications in unlicensed or contention based shared spectrum.; ¶ [0042] The selection of the random access preamble and/or the multiple ROs can be a random selection.; ¶ [0060] The connection response may indicate a contention resolution.). Regarding claim 13, Zhang teaches an apparatus (read as Base Station (BS)) comprising at least one processor (Fig. 11, element 1102 Processor; ¶ [0125] BS may include a processor.), and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform (Fig. 11, element 1102 Processor, element 1104 Memory, element 1106 Instructions; ¶ [0125] The BS may include a memory.; ¶ [0127] The memory may store instructions. The instructions may include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations.): generating a random access - radio network temporary identifier (RA-RNTI) based on the detected RO sequence (read as a function of the multiple ROs) (¶ [0064] A set of rules may be defined for determining RA-RNTI(s).; ¶ [0066] Determine whether to determine a single RA-RNTI or multiple RA-RNTIs for the multiple ROs. The set of rules may specify a new function for determining an RA-RNTI for the multiple ROs. The UE may determine a single RA-RNTI as a function of the multiple ROs.); and using the generated RA-RNTI in the random access procedure (¶ [0006] Monitoring for a random access response (RAR) message based on the one or more determined RA-RNTIs in a RAR window associated with the multiple ROs.). Zhang does not explicitly teach detecting transmission of a first message with repetitions over a random access channel occasion (RO) sequence of multiple ROs that is a determined one of multiple candidate RO sequences of multiple ROs, wherein the first message is part of a random access procedure. In analogous art, Li teaches detecting transmission of a first message with repetitions over a random access channel occasion (RO) sequence of multiple ROs that is a determined one of multiple candidate RO sequences of multiple ROs, wherein the first message is part of a random access procedure (¶ [0005] In response to receiving the SIB, the UE determines a first number of repetitions for a transmission of a RA preamble, a corresponding first resource set, and a corresponding first maximum number of transmissions.; ¶ [0120] Signaling in a SIB, linking sets of path-loss ranges to sets of respective resources for a RA preamble transmission. Each number of repetitions can have an associated PRACH resource configuration.; ¶ [0122] The UE determines a PRACH resource configuration from the acquired mapping.¶ [0131] Table1B provides an exemplary RA preamble resource (time, or frequency, or preamble domain) adjustment according to a number of repetitions for a transmission for a RA preamble.; ¶ [0132] In Table 1B, different resource configurations can be mapped according to a number of RA preamble repetitions. PNG media_image1.png 313 678 media_image1.png Greyscale ). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine transmission of a first message with repetitions as taught by Li with random access procedure as taught by Zhang. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve random access reliability and reduce failed access attempts by transmitting the first random access message with repetitions over configured random access occasions so that the receiving base station has a greater likelihood of detecting the message and responding successfully (Li: ¶ [0005]). Regarding claim 14, Zhang teaches wherein using the generated RA-RNTI comprises scrambling a cyclic redundancy check of downlink control information by the generated RA- RNTI (¶ [0061] The BS may transmit UL and/or DL scheduling grants to the UE via a PDCCH. The scheduling grants may be transmitted in the form of DL control information (DCI).; ¶ [0076] In some aspects, the PDCCH includes DCI including a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) masked by the RA-RNTI (e.g., by scrambling the CRC with the RA-RNTI).; ¶ [0096] The UE may apply a first mask to a CRC in a detected PDCCH using the RA-RNTI.); and transmitting the downlink control information (¶ [0061] The BS may transmit UL and/or DL scheduling grants to the UE via a PDCCH. The scheduling grants may be transmitted in the form of DL control information (DCI). Regarding claim 15, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use an identifier of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0004] The RA-RNTI may be dependent on the time and/or frequency resource locations (e.g., time and/or frequency resource indexes) of the random access resource.; ¶ [0071] The random access ID can be derived based on the frequency-time resource used. There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.; ¶ [0122] Computing an RA-RNTI for multiple ROs.). Regarding claim 16, Zhang teaches wherein the generation of the RA-RNTI (read as computing an RA-RNTI) is configured to further use a time domain parameter t_id as an identifier of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0122] The new function for computing an RA-RNTI for multiple ROs can be defined as: PNG media_image2.png 40 369 media_image2.png Greyscale t_id represents the index.). Regarding claim 17, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to use identification information of ROs belonging to the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0045] A new function for computing RA-RNTI may be defined based on time and/or frequency locations of each RO of the multiple ROs.; ¶ [0071] There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.). Regarding claim 19, Zhang teaches wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use identification information of at least one of a first (read as earliest) RO of the RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0071] There is a one-to-one mapping between the ROs and the random access IDs. The random access IDs are referred to as RA-RNTIs.; ¶ [0095] The UE may determine an RA-RNTI for each RO based on the corresponding RO.; ¶ [0122] PNG media_image2.png 40 369 media_image2.png Greyscale The RO may be an earliest RO, a latest RO, or any RO within the multiple ROs.). Regarding claim 20, Zhang teaches a method comprising: transmitting the first message with repetitions over the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0083] A random access preamble transmission scheme using multiple ROs. Each of the PRACH preamble sequences correspond to the same PRACH preamble sequence. The UE transmits four repetitions of the PRACH preamble sequence.; ¶ [0085] Transmit a MSG1 using multiple ROs.); generating a random access - radio network temporary identifier (RA-RNTI) based on the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs, wherein the generating of the RA-RNTI is configured to use identification information of a last RO of the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs (¶ [0064] A set of rules may be defined for determining RA-RNTI(s).; ¶ [0066] Determine whether to determine a single RA-RNTI or multiple RA-RNTIs for the multiple ROs. The set of rules may specify a new function for determining an RA-RNTI for the multiple ROs. The UE may determine a single RA-RNTI as a function of the multiple ROs.); and using the generated RA-RNTI in the random access procedure (¶ [0006] Monitoring for a random access response (RAR) message based on the one or more determined RA-RNTIs in a RAR window associated with the multiple ROs.). Zhang does not explicitly teach determining a random access channel occasion (RO) sequence of multiple ROs from multiple candidate RO sequences of multiple ROs for transmission of a first message with repetitions in the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs, wherein the first message is part of a random access procedure. In analogous art, Li teaches determining a random access channel occasion (RO) sequence of multiple ROs from multiple candidate RO sequences of multiple ROs for transmission of a first message with repetitions in the determined RO sequence of the multiple ROs, wherein the first message is part of a random access procedure (¶ [0005] In response to receiving the SIB, the UE determines a first number of repetitions for a transmission of a RA preamble, a corresponding first resource set, and a corresponding first maximum number of transmissions.; ¶ [0120] Signaling in a SIB, linking sets of path-loss ranges to sets of respective resources for a RA preamble transmission. Each number of repetitions can have an associated PRACH resource configuration.; ¶ [0122] The UE determines a PRACH resource configuration from the acquired mapping.¶ [0131] Table1B provides an exemplary RA preamble resource (time, or frequency, or preamble domain) adjustment according to a number of repetitions for a transmission for a RA preamble.; ¶ [0132] In Table 1B, different resource configurations can be mapped according to a number of RA preamble repetitions. PNG media_image1.png 313 678 media_image1.png Greyscale ). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine transmission of a first message with repetitions as taught by Li with random access procedure as taught by Zhang. One would have been motivated to do so in order to improve random access reliability and reduce failed access attempts by transmitting the first random access message with repetitions over configured random access occasions so that the receiving base station has a greater likelihood of detecting the message and responding successfully (Li: ¶ [0005]). Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang in view of Li further in view of Shin et al. (US 2024/0340967 A1; hereinafter Shin). Regarding claim 8, Zhang and Li do not explicitly teach wherein the generation of the RA-RNTI is configured to use sum modulo N of the identification information of the multiple ROs in the RO sequence. In analogous art, Shin teaches wherein the generation (read as deriving) of the RA-RNTI is configured to further use a sum modulo N (read as modulo using 2M or 2M-K2M ) of the identification information of the multiple ROs in the RO sequence (¶ [0131] Deriving a random access preamble identifier (e.g., a RA-RNTI) may include a method of applying a modulo operation to the entire existing RA-RNTI equation.; ¶ [0132] PNG media_image3.png 58 381 media_image3.png Greyscale ; ¶ [0142] A specific RNTI may be determined based on a value derived by a modulo operation using 2M or 2M-K2M as a divisor.; Note that the instant application, ¶ [0114] states “mod() is the modulo operator.”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine generating RA-RNTI using sum modulo N as taught by Shin with transmission of a first message with repetitions as taught by Li and random access procedure as taught by Zhang. One would have been motivated to do so in order to allow faster initial access to the network and improve efficiency by reducing the risk of overlapping or duplicated RA-RNTIs modulo arithmetic improves how UEs map to identifiers (Shin: ¶¶ [0004-0005]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wu (US 2015/0117374 A1) discloses “Method of Handling Random Access in Wireless Communication System” Ohara (US 2020/0337090 A1) discloses “User Apparatus” Xiong et. (US 2020/0374928 A1) discloses “RAR Window Enhancement During Random Access Procedure for New Radio (NR)-Unlicensed Spectrum” Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M KAYAL whose telephone number is (703)756-4576. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.M.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2464 /RICKY Q NGO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 11, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641465
DOWNLINK SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12603694
COMPRESSED CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION TRANSFER
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598510
METHOD AND DEVICES FOR LINK ADAPTATION FEEDBACK IN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKS
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588019
Determining Radio Unit DL PRB Scheduling On A Per-Symbol Basis
2y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574990
HIERARCHICAL MOBILITY
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.4%)
3y 1m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 46 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month