Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/451,104

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE FOR PERFORMING PROGRAM OPERATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Priority
Mar 15, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0033794
Examiner
LUONG, DUY HAN
Art Unit
2825
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
34 granted / 36 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
86.1%
+46.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the following communications: the Request for Continued Examination (with claim amendment) filed on April 8, 2026. Claims 1-2, 4-5 and 16-17 are pending. Claims 3 and 18 are canceled. Claims 1 and 16-17 are amended. Claims 6-15 and 19-25 are withdrawn due to an Election/Restriction Requirement. Claims 1 and 16 are independent. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 8, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 4-5 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20190035797), in view of Shen et al. (US 20120307559). Regarding independent claim 1, Lee discloses a semiconductor memory device [Fig. 9: 1120, para. 146] comprising: a first cell string [Fig. 1A: SR11] coupled to a first bit line [Fig. 1A: BL1], the first cell string including a first drain select transistor [Fig. 1A: DSTa], a plurality of memory cells [Fig. 1A: MC1-MCn], and a first source select transistor [Fig. 1A: SSTa, para. 20-27]; and a second cell string [Fig. 1A: SR21] coupled to the first bit line [Fig. 1A: BL1], the second cell string including a second drain select transistor, a plurality of memory cells, and a second source select transistor [see Fig. 1A, para. 20-27], wherein a plurality of data bits are stored in a memory cell group formed by a first memory cell coupled to a first word line among the plurality of memory cells included in the first cell string, and a second memory cell coupled to the first word line among the plurality of memory cells included in the second cell string [see Fig. 1A, a group of memory cells of cell strings SR11 and SR21 is connected to a word line WL1 and stores data, para. 24 and 56], wherein the second memory cell is a memory cell adjacent to the first memory cell among memory cells coupled to the first word line [see Fig. 1A, the memory cell MC1 of memory string SR11 is adjacent to the memory cell of memory string SR21 coupled to the word line WL1, para. 21 and 24], and wherein the first source select transistor and the second source select transistor are controlled through an identical source select line shared by the first memory cell and the second memory cell adjacent the first memory cell [see Fig. 1A, each of the first memory strings SR11 to SR14 and the second memory strings SR21 to SR24 may include a source select transistor SSTa, SSTb or SSTc, a plurality of memory cell transistors MC1 to MCn (n is a natural number of 2 or more), and a drain select transistor DSTa, DSTb or DSTc, which are connected in series by a channel pillar, para. 23. Source select transistors SSTa of the memory strings SR11 and SR21 are controlled through an identical source select line SSLa, para. 25]. However, Lee is silent with respect to wherein a number of data bits stored in each of the first and second memory cells adjacent to each other is a non-integer and wherein a total number of data bits stored in the memory cell group is an integer number represented through a combination of threshold voltage states of the first memory cell and the second memory cell. Shen et al. teach wherein a number of data bits stored in each of the first and second memory cells adjacent to each other is a non-integer [see Fig. 1, memory cell 111-1 of NAND string 109-1 is adjacent to memory cell 112-1 of NAND string 109-2, para. 14. Data from cells 111-1 and 112-1, each storing a number of bits with a 1/2 fractional remainder, (e.g., 21/2 bits), para. 21], and wherein a total number of data bits stored in the memory cell group is an integer number represented through a combination of threshold voltage states of the first memory cell and the second memory cell [a memory cell can be programmed to one of a number of threshold voltage levels corresponding to either an integer or fractional number of bits. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, data from cells 111-1 and 112-1, each storing a number of bits with a 1/2 fractional remainder, (e.g., 21/2 bits), which are coupled to sense lines 107-1 and 107-2, could be combined by logic in control circuitry to output an integer number of bits, para. 22. Cells storing a fractional number of bits can be read as a group in combination with, at least, a number of cells corresponding to the inverse of a fractional remainder of the number of bits stored. For example, two 2 1   2 bit cells could be read together to produce a 5-bit output, and four 3 1   4 bit cells could be read together to produce a 13-bit output, para. 26]. It would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of claimed invention to apply teachings of Lee to the teaching of Shen et al. such that each of memory cells that is connected to the same word line in two adjacent cell strings as taught by Lee stores a non-integer number of data bits as taught by Shen et al. and through a combination of threshold voltage states of Lee’s first memory cell and second memory cell, a total number of data bits stored in the memory cell group is an integer number as taught by Shen et al. to increase storage density and reduce bit error rate [see Shen et al.’s para. 4 and 39]. Regarding claim 2, Lee in combination with Shen et al. teach the limitation with respect to claim 1. Furthermore, Lee discloses the first cell string and the second cell string are disposed adjacent to each other [see Fig. 1A: SR11 and SR21, para. 20], and the first drain select transistor and the second drain select transistor are controlled through different drain select lines [see Fig 1A, para. 26]. Regarding claim 4, Lee in combination with Shen et al. teach the limitation with respect to claim 1. Furthermore, Shen et al. discloses wherein the first memory cell and the second memory cell are each programmed to one of an identical number of threshold voltage states [para. 28-31]. Regarding claim 5, Lee in combination with Shen et al. teach the limitation with respect to claim 4. Furthermore, Shen et al. discloses wherein: the first memory cell and the second memory cell are each programmed to one of three threshold voltage states [Fig. 4A, para. 47], and the memory cell group stores three bits of data [Fig. 4A, para. 47]. Regarding independent claim 16, Lee discloses a semiconductor memory device [Fig. 9: 1120, para. 146] including a plurality of cell strings [Fig. 1A: SR11-SR21] coupled between a bit line [Fig. 1A: BL1] and a source line [Fig. 1: SA, para. 20], the plurality of cell strings each [Fig. 1A: SR11] comprising: a drain select transistor [Fig. 1A: DSTa] coupled to the bit line [Fig. 1A: BL1, para. 23]; a source select transistor [Fig. 1A: SSTa] coupled to the source line [Fig. 1: SA, para. 23]; and a plurality of memory cells [Fig. 1A: MC1-MCn] coupled in series between the drain select transistor and the source select transistor, and coupled to respective word lines [Fig. 1A: WL1-WLn, para. 24], wherein a plurality of data bits are stored in a memory cell group formed by at least a part of the memory cells of the cell strings, the part being coupled to a first word line among the word lines [see Fig. 1A, a group of memory cells of cell strings SR11 and SR21 is connected to a word line WL1 and stores data, para. 24 and 56], wherein a first source select transistor included in a first cell string and a second source select transistor included in a second cell string are controlled through an identical source select line [see Fig. 1A, source select transistors of the cell strings SR11 and SR21 are controlled through an identical source select line SSLa, para. 29]. wherein the memory cell group includes a first memory cell and a second memory cell [see Fig. 1A, a group of memory cells of cell strings SR11 and SR21 is connected to a word line WL1, para. 23-24], wherein the second memory cell is a memory cell adjacent to the first memory cell among memory cells coupled to the first word line [see Fig. 1A, the memory cell MC1 of memory string SR11 is adjacent to the memory cell of memory string SR21 coupled to the word line WL1, para. 21 and 24], and wherein the identical source select line is shared by the first memory cell and the second memory cell adjacent the first memory cell [see Fig. 1A, each of the first memory strings SR11 to SR14 and the second memory strings SR21 to SR24 may include a source select transistor SSTa, SSTb or SSTc, a plurality of memory cell transistors MC1 to MCn (n is a natural number of 2 or more), and a drain select transistor DSTa, DSTb or DSTc, which are connected in series by a channel pillar, para. 23. Source select transistors SSTa of the memory strings SR11 and SR21 are controlled through an identical source select line SSLa, para. 25]. However, Lee is silent with respect to wherein a total number of data bits stored in the memory cell group is represented through a combination of threshold voltage states of memory cells of the part and a number of the data bits stored in each of the first and second memory cells adjacent to each other is a non-integer. Shen et al. teach wherein a total number of data bits stored in the memory cell group is represented through a combination of threshold voltage states of memory cells of the part [a memory cell can be programmed to one of a number of threshold voltage levels corresponding to either an integer or fractional number of bits. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, data from cells 111-1 and 112-1, each storing a number of bits with a 1/2 fractional remainder, (e.g., 21/2 bits), which are coupled to sense lines 107-1 and 107-2, could be combined by logic in control circuitry to output an integer number of bits, para. 22. Cells storing a fractional number of bits can be read as a group in combination with, at least, a number of cells corresponding to the inverse of a fractional remainder of the number of bits stored. For example, two 2 1   2 bit cells could be read together to produce a 5 bit output, and four 3 1   4 bit cells could be read together to produce a 13 bit output, para. 26] and a number of the data bits stored in each of the first and second memory cells adjacent to each other is a non-integer [see Fig. 1, memory cell 111-1 of NAND string 109-1 is adjacent to memory cell 112-1 of NAND string 109-2, para. 14. Data from cells 111-1 and 112-1, each storing a number of bits with a 1/2 fractional remainder, (e.g., 21/2 bits), para. 21]. It would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of claimed invention to apply teachings of Lee to the teaching of Shen et al. such that a total number of data bits stored in the memory cell group is represented through a combination of threshold voltage states of Lee’s memory cells of the part as taught by Shen et al. to increase storage density and reduce bit error rate [see Shen et al.’s para. 4 and 39]. Regarding claim 17, Lee in combination with Shen et al. teach the limitation with respect to claim 16. Furthermore, Lee discloses wherein: a first cell string [Fig. 1A: SR11] including the first memory cell and a second cell string [Fig. 1A: SR21] including the second memory cell are disposed adjacent to each other [see Fig. 1A, para. 20], and a first drain select transistor included in the first cell string and a second drain select transistor included in the second cell string are controlled through different drain select lines [see Fig 1A, para. 26]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed with respect to independent claims 1 and 16 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to independent claim 1, Applicant asserts that neither Lee nor Shen discloses how memory cells storing non-integer bits and representing a total number of data bits are grouped in an interrelated manner. In particular, neither reference provides any teaching or suggestion regarding the physical relationship among the grouped memory cells. Further, the memory cell group in the claimed inventions is composed of memory cells connected to the same source select line. That is, as in claim 1, the "identical source select line shared by the first memory cell and the second memory cell adjacent the first memory cell." This configuration enables a read operation to be simultaneously performed on the memory cells storing the respective bits, thereby improving read speed. Again, neither Lee nor Shen provides any teaching or motivation toward such an arrangement, see Applicant’s Remarks pages 13-16. This particular remark is not considered persuasive. Lee discloses in Figure 1A, first memory strings SR11 included in the first half group HG1 and second memory strings SR21 included in the second half group HG2 are connected to the bit lines BL1, wherein the memory cell MC1 of SR11 is adjacent to the memory cell of SR21 coupled to the word line WL1 [para. 21 and 24]. Moreover, SR11 and SR21 share the source select line SSLa [para. 27]. Therefore, the physical relationship among the grouped memory cells in Figure 1A of Lee reference is similar to the group of cell strings in Figure 7 of the application. Furthermore, Shen et al. teach in Figure 1, memory cell 111-1 of NAND string 109-1 is adjacent to memory cell 112-1 of NAND string 109-2 [para. 14] and data from cells 111-1 and 112-1, each storing a number of bits with a 1/2 fractional remainder, (e.g., 21/2 bits) [para. 21], see the augmented rejection above. For the above reasons, the applied rejection is considered proper and maintained. The other claims were argued for substantially the same reason, and the arguments are not persuasive for the same reason. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DUY H LUONG whose telephone number is (571)270-5088. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Sofocleous can be reached at (571)272-0635. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUY H LUONG/Examiner, Art Unit 2825 /ALEXANDER SOFOCLEOUS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2825
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676194
INTERFACES BETWEEN HIGHER VOLTAGE AND LOWER VOLTAGE WAFERS AND RELATED APPARATUSES AND METHODS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665037
MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING CHARGE PUMP FOR GENERATING VOLTAGE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658264
MEMORY DEVICE PERFORMING ERASE OPERATION AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658259
ADDRESS COUNTER USING ASYNCHRONOUS INPUT AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645589
HALF LATCH LEVEL SHIFTING CIRCUIT FOR NON-VOLATILE MEMORY ARCHITECTURES
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month