Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/452,652

WORK TABLE FOR LASER PROCESSING AND LASER PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Examiner
HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
705 granted / 921 resolved
+6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
967
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 921 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 5 recites the limitation "wherein each of the first, second third, fourth, and fifth control plates includes an adjusting bolt" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It appears either claim 4 should be dependent upon claim 2 to provide proper antecedent basis or claim 5 should be dependent on claim 2 instead of claim 4. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 11-13 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tymosch US 2017/0282308. PNG media_image1.png 448 731 media_image1.png Greyscale Tymosch discloses a work table for laser processing comprising: a lower plate (101) including a first area and a second area surrounding at least a portion of the first area; a first plate (104) disposed in the first area on the lower plate and having a polygonal shape in a plan view; and a second plate (102) disposed in the second area on the lower plate and movable (via rails 120; ¶0027) in the second area. As for claim 4, Tymosch discloses a third plate disposed adjacent to a side of the second area on the lower plate. As for claim 11, Tymosch discloses wherein a plurality of first adsorption holes (110) spaced apart from each other are defined on the first plate (104). As for claim 12, Tymosch discloses wherein a plurality of second adsorption holes (110) adjacent to the first plate and spaced apart from each other are defined on the second plate (104). As for claim 13, Tymosch discloses further comprising: a chamber (300) disposed inside the lower plate, wherein the chamber is connected to the plurality of first adsorption holes (110) and the plurality of second adsorption holes (110). As for claim 16, Tymosch discloses a laser processing apparatus comprising: a lower plate (101) including a first area and a second area surrounding at least a portion of the first area; a first plate (104) disposed in the first area on the lower plate and having a polygonal shape in a plan view; a second plate (102) disposed in the second area on the lower plate, including a groove (140), and movable (via rail 120) in the second area; and a laser unit (400) that radiates a laser beam along the groove and disposed on the lower plate. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 5-10, 14-15 and 17-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claims in the application are deemed to be directed to a nonobvious improvement over the prior art. The claims recite a first, second, third fourth and fifth control plate positioned adjacent to and at specific sides of the first plate. The closest prior art of Tymosch teaches several support plates positioned on a first and third side of the first plate and auxiliary pushers (122) positioned at corners. Tymosch fails to disclose said support plates being at a second side and at a first corner of the first plate where the first and second side meet and at a second corner where the second side and the third side meet the specified positions as claimed specifically the prior art fails to disclose a second control plate positioned on a second side of the first plate. For the above reasons, the claims overcome the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYRONE V HALL JR whose telephone number is (571)270-5948. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 7:30am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at (571) 272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYRONE V HALL JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603483
ABOVE RACK CABLE PULL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595162
Saddle and Removable Extension for a Floor Jack with Storage Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589456
A TOOL ASSEMBLY AND A SYSTEM FOR USING IN A CARRIAGE GUIDE RAIL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590470
VEHICLE PARKING LIFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583090
CONSTRUCTION TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month