Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/453,894

SIDELINK POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNAL (SL-PRS) RESOURCE ALLOCATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 22, 2023
Examiner
KWOH, JASPER C
Art Unit
2415
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
139 granted / 219 resolved
+5.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
246
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 219 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 6/22/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/18/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to because they are other than black and white line drawings. Specifically, all lines must be solid black and well-defined. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2023/0052126 (hereinafter Nam). Regarding claims 1 and 16, Nam discloses a method of operating a wireless communication device, the method comprising: transmitting control information over one or more physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) resources to a peer wireless communication device, wherein the control information includes sidelink positioning reference signal (SL-PRS) configuration information ([0036][0089]: details a slot format may include a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) portion carrying first stage sidelink control information (SCI-1); SCI (such as a first SCI-1) associated with (such as scheduling) an SL-PRS transmission may reserve resources for the SL-PRS 210 in any one or more of a current slot (the slot during which the UE 115 transmits the reserving SCI-1) or one or more future slots); and transmitting SL-PRS over one or more SL-PRS resources indicated by the SL-PRS configuration information to the peer wireless communication device ([0036][0089]: details SCI (such as a first SCI-1) associated with (such as scheduling) an SL-PRS transmission may reserve resources for the SL-PRS 210 in any one or more of a current slot (the slot during which the UE 115 transmits the reserving SCI-1) or one or more future slots), wherein, based on the one or more PSCCH resources and the one or more SL-PRS resources scheduled in a sidelink slot, transmission of the control information over the one or more PSCCH resources and transmission of the SL-PRS over the one or more SL-PRS resources are separated in a time domain by at least a minimum time gap (FIG. 5; [0037]: details SCI, slot, gap portions… that precede an SL-PRS burst; gap symbol 540 between PSCCH 520 and SL-PRS 530). Claims 5 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2023/0086126 (hereinafter Nam2). Regarding claims 15 and 30, Nam 2 discloses a method of operating a wireless communication device, the method comprising: transmitting control information over one or more physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) resources to a peer wireless communication device ([0083]: details sidelink control block 225 may include a PSCCH (e.g., which may carry SCI-1, among other information), SCI-2, and one or more DMRS), wherein the control information includes sidelink positioning reference signal (SL-PRS) configuration information ([0083]: details SCI-1 and/or SCI-2 in the sidelink control block 225 may carry or otherwise convey information for an associated SL-PRS burst 230 (e.g., the time domain resource allocation (TDRA), frequency domain resource allocation (FDRA), a pattern for the SL-PRS burst 230, transmit power level, etc.)); and transmitting SL-PRS over one or more SL-PRS resources indicated by the SL-PRS configuration information to the peer wireless communication device ([0083]: details SL-PRS burst), wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates multiple SL-PRS resources, including the one or more SL-PRS resources for transmission of the SL-PRS, based on: a pattern of at least a first portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, a number of repetitions of the pattern, one or more slots in which the pattern is applicable, one or more specific locations of at least a second portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof ([0083][0084]: details SCI-1 and/or SCI-2 in the sidelink control block 225 may carry or otherwise convey information for an associated SL-PRS burst 230 (e.g., the time domain resource allocation (TDRA), frequency domain resource allocation (FDRA), a pattern for the SL-PRS burst 230, transmit power level, etc.)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nam in view of US 2023/0171750 (hereinafter Lee). Regarding claims 2 and 17, Nam does not explicitly teach wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates: a slot in which one of the one or more SL-PRS resources is located, a symbol index in the slot indicating a starting symbol of the one of the one or more SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof. However, Lee teaches wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates: a slot in which one of the one or more SL-PRS resources is located, a symbol index in the slot indicating a starting symbol of the one of the one or more SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof ([0154]: details Since the SL-PRS is preferably transmitted as a contiguous wideband signal, the resource region (e.g., frequency region) for SL-PRS transmission may be configured with a position (or index) of a starting RB and the number (length) of RBs constituting the resource region (e.g., frequency region). Alternatively, the resource region (e.g., frequency region) for SL-PRS transmission may be configured with a position (or index) of a starting subchannel and the number (length) of subchannels constituting the resource region (e.g., frequency region)). Therefore, it would have been obvious at to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Nam to incorporate the teachings of Lee and include wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates: a slot in which one of the one or more SL-PRS resources is located, a symbol index in the slot indicating a starting symbol of the one of the one or more SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof of Lee with Nam. Doing so would improve performance of the communication system (Lee, paragraph [0026]). Claims 4-6 and 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nam in view of US 2022/0397633 (hereinafter Baek). Regarding claims 4 and 19, Nam does not explicitly teach receiving other control information over one or more other PSCCH resources that includes other configuration information from one or more other wireless communication devices; and determining the one or more PSCCH resources and the one or more SL-PRS resources based on the other configuration information and the minimum time gap. However, Baek teaches receiving other control information over one or more other PSCCH resources that includes other configuration information from one or more other wireless communication devices; and determining the one or more PSCCH resources and the one or more SL-PRS resources based on the other configuration information and the minimum time gap ([0132][0217][0229]). Therefore, it would have been obvious at to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Nam to incorporate the teachings of Baek and include receiving other control information over one or more other PSCCH resources that includes other configuration information from one or more other wireless communication devices; and determining the one or more PSCCH resources and the one or more SL-PRS resources based on the other configuration information and the minimum time gap of Baek with Nam. Doing so would effectively provide sidelink positioning related control information (Baek, paragraph [0040]). Regarding claims 5 and 20, Nam does not explicitly teach obtaining information specifying the minimum time gap from a server device different from the wireless communication device and different from the peer wireless communication device. However, Baek teaches obtaining information specifying the minimum time gap from a server device different from the wireless communication device and different from the peer wireless communication device ([0130]-[0132]). Therefore, it would have been obvious at to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Nam to incorporate the teachings of Baek and include obtaining information specifying the minimum time gap from a server device different from the wireless communication device and different from the peer wireless communication device of Baek with Nam. Doing so would effectively provide sidelink positioning related control information (Baek, paragraph [0040]). Regarding claims 6 and 21, Nam does not explicitly teach obtaining capability information of the peer wireless communication device; and determining the minimum time gap based on the capability information of the peer wireless communication device. However, Baek teaches obtaining capability information of the peer wireless communication device; and determining the minimum time gap based on the capability information of the peer wireless communication device ([0132]: details relationship between the minimum time gap and the processing time of the UE). Therefore, it would have been obvious at to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Nam to incorporate the teachings of Baek and include obtaining capability information of the peer wireless communication device; and determining the minimum time gap based on the capability information of the peer wireless communication device of Baek with Nam. Doing so would effectively provide sidelink positioning related control information (Baek, paragraph [0040]). Claims 3 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nam in view of Nam2. Regarding claims 3 and 18, Nam does not explicitly teach wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates multiple SL-PRS resources, including the one or more SL-PRS resources for the transmission of the SL-PRS, based on: a pattern of at least a first portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, a number of repetitions of the pattern, one or more slots in which the pattern is applicable, one or more specific locations of at least a second portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof. However, Nam2 teaches wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates multiple SL-PRS resources, including the one or more SL-PRS resources for the transmission of the SL-PRS, based on: a pattern of at least a first portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, a number of repetitions of the pattern, one or more slots in which the pattern is applicable, one or more specific locations of at least a second portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof ([0083][0084]: details SCI-1 and/or SCI-2 in the sidelink control block 225 may carry or otherwise convey information for an associated SL-PRS burst 230 (e.g., the time domain resource allocation (TDRA), frequency domain resource allocation (FDRA), a pattern for the SL-PRS burst 230, transmit power level, etc.)). Therefore, it would have been obvious at to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Nam to incorporate the teachings of Nam2 and include wherein the SL-PRS configuration information indicates multiple SL-PRS resources, including the one or more SL-PRS resources for the transmission of the SL-PRS, based on: a pattern of at least a first portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, a number of repetitions of the pattern, one or more slots in which the pattern is applicable, one or more specific locations of at least a second portion of the multiple SL-PRS resources, or a combination thereof of Nam2 with Nam. Doing so would improve positioning accuracy (Nam2, paragraph [0072]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhou (US 2024/0049163) details positioning. Li (US 2024/0356699) details sidelink positioning. Wang (US 2025/0031175) details PRS transmission. Zhang (US 2026/0059558) details resource mapping. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jasper Kwoh whose telephone number is (408)918-7644. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday through Friday, 10am to 4pm Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached at (571) 270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASPER KWOH/ Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696258
SERVICE SPECIFIC BEAM RADIO FREQUENCY BEAM OPTIMIZATION FOR 5G NETWORKS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684541
DELAYED GRANT FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671486
TECHNIQUES FOR MITIGATING REDUNDANT BEAM FAILURE RECOVERY MEDIUM ACCESS SIGNALING
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12641610
METHODS, TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK NODE FOR UPLINK TRANSMISSION
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634915
USER EQUIPMENT, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 219 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month