Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/455,083

INSTRUMENTATION-ASSISTED EMULATION DEBUG OF ASPECT-ORIENTED HARDWARE WITH MIXED LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 24, 2023
Examiner
TAT, BINH C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1061 granted / 1215 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1239
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§103
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§102
87.9%
+47.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1215 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to application 18/455083 filed on 08/24/23. Summary of claims Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-20 are rejected. Oath/Declaration The oath/declaration filed on August 24th, 2023 is acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yeh et al. (US Pub. 2010/0241414). As to claim 1 the prior art teaches a computer-implemented method for instrumentation-assisted debugging, the computer-implemented method comprising: compiling a hardware design to generate a compiled design (see fig 1-3 paragraph 34-36); generating, from the compiled design, code for the hardware design and debug assist elements (see fig 1-5 paragraph 36-42); feeding the code into a vendor emulation flow that outputs a vendor waveform (see fig 4-7 paragraph 41-46); and transforming the vendor waveform into a logic simulation waveform compatible with a hardware design language (HDL) using the debug assist elements for hardware logic debugging (see fig 4-8 paragraph 45-51). As to claim 2, 9 and 16 the prior art teaches wherein the hardware design is generated from mixed-language sources (see fig 1-3 paragraph 0033-0035). As to claim 3, 10 and 17 the prior art teaches wherein the compiling is executed by a register transfer level (RTL) compiler (see fig 1-3 paragraph 0008-0010 and 0033). As to claim 4, 11 and 18 the prior art teaches wherein the code for the hardware design is a hardware description language (HDL) (see fig 5-7 paragraph 0041-0044). As to claim 5, 12 and 19 the prior art teaches wherein the vendor emulation flow comprises a vendor compiling operation, a vendor emulation operation and a vendor waveform generation operation of multiple vendors (see fig 5-7 paragraph 0042-0045). As to claim 6 and 13 the prior art teaches wherein the generating of the debug assist elements comprises adding one or more extensions to a platform for executing the computer-implemented method (see fig 5-7 paragraph 0038-0043). As to claim 7, 14 and 20 the prior art teaches wherein the one or more extensions are configured to extract and store type information that can be augmented into the logic simulation waveform (see fig 8-10 paragraph 0054-0057). As to claim 8 the prior art teaches a computer program product for instrumentation-assisted debugging, the computer program product comprising one or more computer readable storage media having computer readable program code collectively stored on the one or more computer readable storage media, the computer readable program code being executed by a processor of a computer system to cause the computer system to perform a method comprising: compiling a hardware design to generate a compiled design (see fig 1-3 paragraph 34-36); generating, from the compiled design, code for the hardware design and debug assist elements (see fig 1-5 paragraph 36-42); feeding the code into a vendor emulation flow that outputs a vendor waveform (see fig 4-7 paragraph 41-46); and transforming the vendor waveform into a logic simulation waveform compatible with a hardware design language (HDL) using the debug assist elements for hardware logic debugging (see fig 4-8 paragraph 45-51). As to claim 15 the prior art teaches a computing system comprising: a processor; a memory coupled to the processor; and one or more computer readable storage media coupled to the processor, the one or more computer readable storage media collectively containing instructions that are executed by the processor via the memory to cause the processor to perform steps for instrumentation-assisted debugging comprising: compiling a hardware design to generate a compiled design (see fig 1-3 paragraph 34-36); generating, from the compiled design, code for the hardware design and debug assist elements (see fig 1-5 paragraph 36-42); feeding the code into a vendor emulation flow that outputs a vendor waveform (see fig 4-7 paragraph 41-46); and transforming the vendor waveform into a logic simulation waveform compatible with a hardware design language (HDL) using the debug assist elements for hardware logic debugging (see fig 4-8 paragraph 45-51). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BINH C TAT whose telephone number is 571 272-1908. The examiner can normally be reached on flex 7:00Am-8PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached on 571 272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BINH C TAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675628
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE OF CELL ARRAY WITH ADAPTIVE THRESHOLD VOLTAGE
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675629
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670310
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING DESIGN RULE CHECK VIOLATIONS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665443
System and Method for Purchasing Wireless Battery Charge for Electronic Devices
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12664340
INTERACTIVELY PRESENTING FOR MINIMUM OVERLAP SHAPES IN AN IC DESIGN
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1215 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month