Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/455,629

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Priority
Feb 26, 2021 — JP 2021-030481 +1 more
Examiner
BLACKWELL, ASHLEY NICOLE
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
97%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 97% — above average
97%
Career Allowance Rate
70 granted / 72 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
102
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
68.8%
+28.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 72 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/06/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 5-7, filed 08/06/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-6 under 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made using Choi (US 20110241562 A1) in view of Kawaura (US 20130076994 A1). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/20/2026 was filed after the mailing date of the final rejection on 05/06/2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-6, 8, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi (US 20110241562 A1) in view of Kawaura (US 20130076994 A1). Regarding claim 1, Choi discloses a display device comprising: a base (111) having a display area (100) and a surrounding area (110) outside the display area; (Fig. 1) a first insulating layer (IL1) arranged on the base (111); ([0062], Fig. 2) a first electrode (710) arranged on the first insulating layer (IL1) overlapping with a pixel (70 included in the display area (left side of the figure break in 101); ([0023], [0057], Fig. 1-2) a second insulating layer (IL2) arranged on the first insulating layer (IL1) and including an aperture overlapping with the first electrode (710); ([0062], Fig. 2) a first spacer (IL3 annotated below) partially arranged on the second insulating layer (IL2) overlapping with the display area (left side of the figure break in 101); (Fig. 2) a partition (SP) arranged on the second insulating layer (IL2) and the first spacer (IL3) so as to separate the pixel (70); (Fig. 2) an organic layer (720) in contact with the first electrode (710) through the aperture; ([0058], Fig. 2) a second electrode (730) arranged on the organic layer (720); ([0058], Fig. 2) a second spacer (another IL3 annotated below) partially arranged on the second insulating layer (IL2) overlapping with the surrounding area (right side of figure break in 101); (Fig. 2) and a support member (annotated below) arranged on the second spacer (another IL3) and corresponding to the partition (SP). (Fig. 2) a metal layer (735) arranged on the first insulating layer (IL1) in the surrounding area (right side of figure break in 101); ([0063], Fig. 2) and PNG media_image1.png 512 879 media_image1.png Greyscale Choi does not disclose: a shield member arranged in the surrounding area, wherein the metal layer includes a plurality of hole portions, and the shield member is arranged on the second insulating layer at a position overlapping with one of the plurality of hole portions. However, Kawaura discloses: a shield member (25C) arranged in the surrounding area (20), ([0036], Fig. 2) wherein the metal layer (23) includes a plurality of hole portions (25Z), ([0035], Fig. 2) and the shield member (25C) is arranged on the second insulating layer (24) at a position overlapping with one of the plurality of hole portions (25Z). (Fig. 2) It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teachings of Choi and Kawaura to arrive at the claimed invention in order to “prevent light from entering the drive circuit” ([0035]) so that “probability of short circuit is allowed to be further decreased.” ([0059]) Regarding claim 2, Choi discloses the display device of claim 1. Choi does not disclose wherein a height of the second spacer and the support member is substantially the same as a height of the first spacer and the partition. However, it would be obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date to use the teachings of Choi since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). See MPEP 2144.04. Regarding claim 3, Choi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein a plurality of first spacers (IL3 annotated above) are arranged at regular intervals on the second insulating layer (IL2) overlapping with the display area (left side of figure break in 101), and a plurality of second spacers (another IL3 annotated above) are arranged at regular intervals on the second insulating layer (IL2) overlapping with the surrounding area (right side of figure break in 101). (Fig. 2) Regarding claim 4, Choi discloses the display device of claim 3, wherein the intervals at which the second spacers (another IL3 annotated above) are arranged on the second insulating layer (IL2) are substantially the same to the intervals at which the first spacers (IL3 annotated above) are arranged on the second insulating layer (IL2). (Fig. 2) Regarding claim 5, Choi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the first spacer (IL3 annotated above) and the second spacer (another IL3 annotated above) are formed of the same material (insulating material) as the second insulating layer (IL2). (Fig. 2) Regarding claim 6, Choi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the partition (SP) has a shape in which a width of an upper portion is larger than a width of a lower portion. (Fig. 2) Regarding claim 8, Choi discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the metal layer (735) is arranged on the same layer as the first electrode (710). ([0063], Fig. 2) Regarding claim 9, Kawaura discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein a plurality of shield members (25b/25c) respectively cover, in a plan view, a plurality of the hole portions (25z). (Fig. 4B) It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date to use the teachings of Kawaura for similar reasons mentioned above. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawaura (US 20130076994 A1) as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of Ma et al. (US 10756136 B1). Regarding claim 10, Kawaura discloses the display device of claim 9. Kawaura does not disclose wherein the plurality of shield members are connected to each other. However, Ma discloses: the plurality of shield members (303) are connected to each other (by 30). (Note per Ma’s disclosure, “Alternatively, in other embodiments, the light-blocking layer forms a mesh to cover the first display area and the second display area to form the power voltage trace of the whole display panel,” col. 6, lines 45-50, Fig. 8) It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date to combine the teachings of Kawaura and Ma for the plurality of shield members are connected to each other to reduce “the trace width of the second display area” (col. 6, lines 45-50) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHLEY BLACKWELL whose telephone number is (703)756-1508. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-1600. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at 469-295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY NICOLE BLACKWELL/Examiner, Art Unit 2897 /JACOB Y CHOI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
May 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751257
FIN STRUCTURES
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740236
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721216
IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720993
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICES
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720994
DISPLAY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
97%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (-1.1%)
3y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 72 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month