Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/455,796

CIRCUIT DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Priority
Aug 29, 2022 — JP 2022-135673
Examiner
MCDANIEL, TYNESE V
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
224 granted / 379 resolved
-8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
435
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
57.9%
+17.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§112
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 379 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 8/27/2026. Claims 1-12 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Response to arguments Applicant amended claims 1 and 2, which changes the scope of the claims and as such a new grounds of rejection is issued. In regards to applicants remaining remarks: Applicant remarks have been considered but are moot base on new grounds of rejection. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 8/5/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miyamoto (US 5818202) in view of Jung (US 20170104359). As to claim 1, Miyamoto discloses a circuit device comprising: a current source circuit (Fig. 12 fixed-current power supplies 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4); a first charging circuit (Fig. 12 T2) configured to supply, based on an output current of the current source circuit, a first charging current, as a charging current to a charging node (Column 16 lines 31-65 and Columns 17 lines 1-34…charging apparatus is provided with a charging terminal 3 (charging node) for the charging of the secondary cell 2); a second charging circuit (Fig. 12 T1) configured to supply, based on the output current of the current source circuit, a second charging current, which is greater than the first charging current, as the charging current to the charging node (the fixed-current power supply 6-1 is driven by the ON signal from the output Q0 of the counter 22, so that the secondary cell 2 is charged by supplying it with a 2 C charging current); and a control circuit (current-adjusting means 7 and control means 8) configured to output, based on a current setting value for setting a current value of the charging current (an ON signal is output from the comparator 21), a current source control value (Q0 through Q3) for controlling the output current of the current source circuit to the current source circuit (Column 16 lines 56-67 and Column 17 lines 1-2 an ON signal is output from the comparator 21 of the above-noted control means 8, this being input to the CLK clock signal terminal of the counter 22 provided in the current-adjusting means 7….The above-noted counter 22 selects one of the output terminals in the sequence Q0 through Q3 each time the ON signal is input to the clock signal terminal CLK thereof, thereby outputting the ON signal therefrom), wherein the control circuit controls, when the current setting value is in a first current range, a first current mode (1C) in which the first charging current having a current value indicated by the current setting value is supplied from the first charging circuit to the charging node (Column 17 lines 18-26…an ON signal is output from the comparator 21 of the control means 8, this being input to the clock signal terminal CLK of the counter 22 provided in the current-adjusting means 7, causing the Q0 output thereof to be switched OFF and the Q1 output thereof to be switched ON, this action causing selection of the fixed-current power supply 6-2, so that the second charging operation, in which the secondary cell 2 is supplied with a 1 C charging current, is started), controls, when the current setting value is in a second current range on a current side higher than the first current range, a second current mode (2C) in which the second charging current having a current value indicated by the current setting value is supplied from the second charging circuit to the charging node ( Column 17 lines 13-17.. first in the first charging operation, the fixed-current power supply 6-1 is driven by the ON signal from the output Q0 of the counter 22, so that the secondary cell 2 is charged by supplying it with a 2 C charging current), and sets the current source control value (Q0 through Q3) such that the output current of the current source circuit is zero or is reduced during a switching period of the current source control value (Fig. 14 Column 17 lines 27-33.. each time the output voltage of the secondary cell 2 reaches the reference voltage in each of the charging operations, the charging current C rate is made successively lower than the charging current C rate used in the previous charging operation, and the charging operation is repeated). Miyamoto does not disclose/teach the control circuit sets the current source control value such that, during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode, the output current of the current source circuit is set to a value smaller than the output current in both the first current mode and the second current mode. Jung teaches a control circuit sets the current source control value such that, during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode, the output current of the current source circuit is set to a value smaller than the output current in both the first current mode and the second current mode ([0103]- [0104] FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a relationship between a plurality of charging periods and an idle period….A first charging period may be a period when the battery is charged with a first constant current, and a second charging period may be a period when the battery is charged with a second constant current smaller than the first constant current. … a first idle period between the first charging period and the second charging period, … Voltage measurement of the battery may be performed in the idle periods). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the control circuit of Miyamoto to sets the current source control value such that, during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode, the output current of the current source circuit is set to a value smaller than the output current in both the first current mode and the second current mode in order to reduce degradation in the lifespan of a battery due to charging [0055]. As to claim 2, Miyamoto in view of Jung teaches discloses the circuit device according to claim 1, wherein when the current source control value is greater than a threshold value, the control circuit sets the current source control value such that the output current is zero or is reduced during the switching period (Column 17 lines 18-33..If … the current-adjusting means 7, causing the Q0 output thereof to be switched OFF and the Q1 output thereof to be switched ON, this action causing selection of the fixed-current power supply 6-2, so that the second charging operation, in which the secondary cell 2 is supplied with a 1 C charging current, is started… Thereafter in the same manner, each time the output voltage of the secondary cell 2 reaches the reference voltage in each of the charging operations, the charging current C rate is made successively lower than the charging current C rate used in the previous charging operation). As to claim 3, Miyamoto in view of Jung teaches the circuit device according to claim 1. The embodiment shown in Fig 14 of Miyamoto does not disclose/teach wherein the control circuit sets both the first charging current and the second charging current to a non-supply state during the switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode Miyamoto teaches an embodiment wherein the control circuit sets both the first charging current and the second charging current to a non-supply state during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode (Column 25 lines 25-22 In the first charging operation, the charging is performed with a 2C charging current, and at the point at which approximately 750 seconds have elapsed from the start of the charging, the charging is temporarily interrupted and, after a waiting time of 60 seconds, the next charging operation, using a charging current of 1 C is started, that charging operation being stopped when 2550 seconds have elapsed). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the embodiment of Miyamoto to wherein the control circuit sets both the first charging current and the second charging current to a non-supply state during the switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode in order to measure the output voltage after removing the internal polarization and allowing the output voltage to stabilize (Column 13 lines 1-3). As to claim 4, Miyamoto in view of Jung teaches the circuit device according to claim 3, wherein the control circuit outputs a first enable signal for controlling the first charging current to a supply state or the non- supply state (Q1) and a second enable signal for controlling the second charging current to the supply state or the non- supply state (Q0), The embodiment shown in Fig 14 of Miyamoto does not disclose/teach during the switching period, sets both the first charging current and the second charging current to the non- supply state by deactivating the first enable signal and the second enable signal Miyamoto teaches an embodiment during the switching period, sets both the first charging current and the second charging current to the non-supply state by deactivating the first enable signal and the second enable signal (Column 25 lines 25-22 In the first charging operation, the charging is performed with a 2 C charging current, and at the point at which approximately 750 seconds have elapsed from the start of the charging, the charging is temporarily interrupted and, after a waiting time of 60 seconds, the next charging operation, using a charging current of 1 C is started, that charging operation being stopped when 2550 seconds have elapsed). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the embodiment of Miyamoto to during the switching period, sets both the first charging current and the second charging current to the non- supply state by deactivating the first enable signal and the second enable signal in order to measure the output voltage after removing the internal polarization and allowing the output voltage to stabilize (Column 13 lines 1-3). Claim 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miyamoto (US 5818202) in view of Jung (US 20170104359) in view of Jiang (US20210359534). As to claim 5, Miyamoto in view of Jung teaches the circuit device according to claim 1, wherein in the first current mode, the current source circuit supplies, as the output current to the first charging circuit, a first current having a current value indicated by the current source control value (Column 17 lines 18-26), and in the second current mode, the current source circuit supplies, as the output current to the second charging circuit, a second current having a current value indicated by the current source control value (Column 17 lines 18-26). Miyamoto does not disclose/teach the first charging circuit supplies the first charging current by amplifying the first current with a first gain and the second charging circuit supplies the second charging current by amplifying the second current with a second gain greater than the first gain Jiang teaches the first charging circuit (CU1/COM1) supplies the first charging current by amplifying the first current with a first gain (132 - when the current is less than the fast charge threshold the voltage control amplifier COM1 takes effect and current increases from 0.5A-1A - i.e. first gain) and the second charging circuit (CUN/COM2) supplies the second charging current by amplifying the second current with a second gain greater than the first gain (135 - equal to fast charge threshold current so current control amplifier COM2 takes effect boosting the charging from 1A to 2A which has a higher gain than the first). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the circuit device of Miyamoto to include the first charging circuit supplies the first charging current by amplifying the first current with a first gain and the second charging circuit supplies the second charging current by amplifying the second current with a second gain greater than the first gain in order to adjust the charging voltage which improves charging efficiency (15). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding dependent claim 6, Although the prior art discloses a circuit device comprising: a current source circuit; a first charging circuit configured to supply, based on an output current of the current source circuit, a first charging current, as a charging current to a charging node; a second charging circuit configured to supply, based on the output current of the current source circuit, a second charging current, which is greater than the first charging current, as the charging current to the charging node; and a control circuit configured to output, based on a current setting value for setting a current value of the charging current, a current source control value for controlling the output current of the current source circuit to the current source circuit, wherein the control circuit controls, when the current setting value is in a first current range, a first current mode in which the first charging current having a current value indicated by the current setting value is supplied from the first charging circuit to the charging node, controls, when the current setting value is in a second current range on a current side higher than the first current range, a second current mode in which the second charging current having a current value indicated by the current setting value is supplied from the second charging circuit to the charging node, and sets the current source control value such that the output current of the current source circuit is zero or is reduced during a switching period of the current source control value, and sets the current source control value such that, during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode, the output current of the current source circuit is set to a value smaller than the output current in both the first current mode and the second current mode, wherein in the first current mode, the current source circuit supplies, as the output current to the first charging circuit, a first current having a current value indicated by the current source control value, and the first charging circuit supplies the first charging current by amplifying the first current with a first gain, and in the second current mode, the current source circuit supplies, as the output current to the second charging circuit, a second current having a current value indicated by the current source control value, and the second charging circuit supplies the second charging current by amplifying the second current with a second gain greater than the first gain, the prior art of record does not disclose or teach the combination of: “wherein the current source circuit includes first to n-th current sources whose output or non-output of first to n-th constant currents, having current values weighted in binary, is controlled based on the current source control value, n being an integer of 2 or more, and during the switching period of the current source control value, the control circuit sets the current source control value at which the first to n-th constant currents are not output, or sets the current source control value at which p-th to n-th constant currents on a high-current side among the first to n-th constant currents are not output, p being an integer of 2 or more and n or less”. Regarding dependent claim 9, Although the prior art discloses a circuit device comprising: a current source circuit; a first charging circuit configured to supply, based on an output current of the current source circuit, a first charging current, as a charging current to a charging node; a second charging circuit configured to supply, based on the output current of the current source circuit, a second charging current, which is greater than the first charging current, as the charging current to the charging node; and a control circuit configured to output, based on a current setting value for setting a current value of the charging current, a current source control value for controlling the output current of the current source circuit to the current source circuit, wherein the control circuit controls, when the current setting value is in a first current range, a first current mode in which the first charging current having a current value indicated by the current setting value is supplied from the first charging circuit to the charging node, controls, when the current setting value is in a second current range on a current side higher than the first current range, a second current mode in which the second charging current having a current value indicated by the current setting value is supplied from the second charging circuit to the charging node, and sets the current source control value such that the output current of the current source circuit is zero or is reduced during a switching period of the current source control value, and sets the current source control value such that, during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode, the output current of the current source circuit is set to a value smaller than the output current in both the first current mode and the second current mode, wherein in the first current mode, the current source circuit supplies, as the output current to the first charging circuit, a first current having a current value indicated by the current source control value, and the first charging circuit supplies the first charging current by amplifying the first current with a first gain, and in the second current mode, the current source circuit supplies, as the output current to the second charging circuit, a second current having a current value indicated by the current source control value, and the second charging circuit supplies the second charging current by amplifying the second current with a second gain greater than the first gain, the prior art of record does not disclose or teach the combination of: “wherein the current source circuit includes a first current source circuit including m current sources whose output or non-output of m constant currents, having current values weighted in binary, is controlled based on a first current source control value, m being an integer of 2 or more, and a second current source circuit including n current sources whose output or non-output of n constant currents, having current values weighted in binary, is controlled based on a second current source control value, n being an integer of m or more, and the control circuit outputs the first current source control value and the second current source control value as the current source control value, during a switching period of the first current source control value, sets the first current source control value at which the m constant currents are not output, or sets the first current source control value at which s constant currents on a high-current side among the m constant currents are not output, s being an integer of 1 or more and less than m, and during a switching period of the second current source control value, sets the second current source control value at which the n constant currents are not output, or sets the second current source control value at which t constant currents on a high-current side among the n constant currents are not output, t being an integer of 1 or more and less than n”. As to claims 7-8, and 10-11, is also objected to as they include the allowable subject matter in claim 6 and 9. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion and Related Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kong et al (US 20240305122) is cited for having a control circuit the control circuit sets the current source control value such that, during a switching period between the first current mode and the second current mode, the output current of the current source circuit is set to a value smaller than the output current in both the first current mode and the second current mode (Fig. 8). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYNESE V MCDANIEL whose telephone number is (313)446-6579. The examiner can normally be reached on M to F, 9am to 530pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYNESE V MCDANIEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 27, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771155
CHARGER CIRCUIT
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771167
System and Method for Hybrid Power Generation with Grid Connection
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759417
Vehicle, Charging Method, and Computer Apparatus
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756235
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION METHOD IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
4y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752656
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SYSTEM CAPABLE OF GENERATING ELECTRICITY BY SOLAR ENERGY
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 4m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 379 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month