Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Tynese V Mcdaniel, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as MCDANIEL, TYNESE V

Tech Center 3700 • Art Units: 2859 3791

This examiner grants 59% of resolved cases

Analysis

Tynese V. McDaniel has a 59.1% allowance rate across 379 resolved cases in Art Unit 2859. The median days to allowance is 1232. An interview lift of 15.9% suggests that interviews are a helpful tool for advancing cases toward allowance. This positive lift indicates that practitioners can improve their outcomes compared to the 59.1% baseline by engaging in direct dialogue with the examiner to resolve technical or legal disagreements during the prosecution process.

Toyota Motor Corporation, ASUSTeK Computer Inc., and Ford Motor Company are frequent applicants. JCIPRNET, Oliff PLC, and ArentFox Schiff LLP are the top firms. The 59.1% allowance rate and 1232-day median pendency provide a baseline for expectations in Tech Center 3700. For the automotive and electronics companies listed, the 15.9% lift is a tactical advantage. The data suggests that for these entities, oral advocacy is a productive strategy to leverage the increase in allowance likelihood and navigate the complexities of their 379 resolved cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

59.1%
Allow Rate
-10.9% vs TC avg
435
Total Applications
+15.9%
Interview Lift
1232
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 379 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

3.2%
§101 Eligibility
7.0%
§102 Novelty
57.9%
§103 Obviousness
30.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18602552 POWER CONTROL METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SAME Non-Final OA Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
18361696 MOBILE CHARGERS Final Rejection MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION
18455796 CIRCUIT DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE Final Rejection SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
18314619 ROBOTIC TOOL AND CHARGING STATION Final Rejection TECHTRONIC CORDLESS GP
18600328 SOLAR CHARGING SYSTEM Non-Final OA TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18411200 CONTROL DEVICE Non-Final OA TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18342786 DETERMINATION METHOD OF BATTERY Non-Final OA TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18342282 ENERGY MANAGEMENT METHOD, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND COMPUTER DEVICE Final Rejection TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18282303 VOLTAGE CONVERSION CIRCUIT, CHARGING MANAGEMENT MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE Non-Final OA HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
18424873 POWER SUPPLY CIRCUIT Non-Final OA ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
18528793 ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND BATTERY POWER DISPLAYING METHOD THEREOF Non-Final OA ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
18159819 ELECTRONIC DEVICE Final Rejection ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.
18267161 Battery Management System, Battery Pack, Electric Vehicle, and Battery Management Method Final Rejection LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
18523325 BATTERY AND POWER STORAGE SYSTEM Non-Final OA HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
18367774 Battery Charging Control Device and Battery Charging Control Method Non-Final OA Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG
18597052 BATTERY PACK AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME Non-Final OA MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.
18493846 SELECTIVE DISABLING OF BATTERIES FROM BATTERY PACK BASED ON PREDICTED LEVEL OF DENDRITE FORMATION Final Rejection International Business Machines Corporation
18393895 ACTIVE RIPPLE ENERGY STORAGE CIRCUIT VIA STANDALONE BOOSTER MODULE CONNECTED WITH HIGH VOLTAGE DC BUS Non-Final OA FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
17652241 LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR RECHARGE SYSTEM Non-Final OA Medtronic, Inc.
18634476 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATION WIRELESS CHARGING TRANSMITTER Non-Final OA STMicroelectronics International N.V.
18493683 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIDE-RANGE ENERGY HARVESTING USING AUTO-CHANGE DUAL MODE MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING Non-Final OA POSTECH Research and Business Development Foundation
18628303 NEAR-FIELD-COMMUNICATION-BASED POWER CONTROL FOR AN ANALYTE SENSOR SYSTEM Non-Final OA Dexcom, Inc.
18444201 CAPACITOR DISCHARGE Non-Final OA Analog Devices International Unlimited Company
18201063 ACTIVE ELECTROCHEMICAL EXCITATION SYSTEM Final Rejection Analog Devices International Unlimited Company
18616187 BATTERY SYSTEM Non-Final OA Prime Planet Energy & Solutions, Inc.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Tynese V Mcdaniel's allowance rate?

59.1% of resolved applications examined by Tynese V Mcdaniel were allowed (379 resolved cases), compared with 60.2% across Art Unit 2859 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Tynese V Mcdaniel?

This examiner's interview lift is +15.9 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Tynese V Mcdaniel take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Tynese V Mcdaniel took 1,232 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Tynese V Mcdaniel work in?

Tynese V Mcdaniel examines applications in Art Unit 2859 in Tech Center 3700 (Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month