Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/456,261

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 25, 2023
Priority
Sep 16, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0117048
Examiner
HUNTER III, CARNELL
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
57 granted / 63 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
76.1%
+36.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 63 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A1, claims 1-5 and 10-16, in the reply filed on 02/11/2026 is acknowledged. IDS The IDS document(s) filed on 08/25/2023 have been considered. Copies of the PTO-1449 documents are herewith enclosed with this office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oh et al. (US 2021/0134761 A1), hereafter “Oh”. As to claim 1, Oh teaches a semiconductor package (1000, Fig. 1B, ⁋ [0025]), comprising: a first semiconductor chip (200) including: a first substrate (201, ⁋ [0026]) comprising a second surface (top surface); a plurality of through electrodes (210) extending in the first substrate; and first bonding pads (212, ⁋ [0029]) on the second surface of the first substrate, wherein the first bonding pads are electrically connected to the plurality of through electrodes (⁋ [0029]); a second semiconductor chip (100) including: a second substrate (101, ⁋ [0039]) comprising a first surface (bottom surface); a second wiring layer (135, ⁋ [0041]) on the first surface of the second substrate; redistribution pads (130Pd, ⁋⁋ [0039]-[0042]) in the second wiring layer; second bonding pads (141 of 140D1, ⁋⁋ [0047]-[0048]) on the redistribution pads; first conductive bumps (143 of 140D1, Fig. 1B, ⁋⁋ [0047]-[0048]) between the first bonding pads and the second bonding pads; and a test pad region (see annotated Fig. 1B below), between the first conductive bumps, wherein the test pad region comprises a test pad (130Pt, ⁋ [0042]) in the second wiring layer, wherein the second semiconductor chip (100) is stacked on the first semiconductor chip (200) via the first conductive bumps (143 of 140); an adhesive layer (150, ⁋ [0025]) between the first semiconductor chip (200) and the second semiconductor chip (100), wherein the adhesive layer is disposed between the first conductive bumps (143 of 140); and flow prevention structures (140D2, ⁋⁋ [0045], [0063]) in the adhesive layer, wherein the flow prevention structures are disposed in the test pad region (see annotated Fig. 1B). PNG media_image1.png 642 1034 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claim 2, Oh teaches the semiconductor package of claim 1, wherein the adhesive layer (150) includes a non-conductive film (NCF) (⁋ [0051]). As to claim 10, Oh teaches the semiconductor package of claim 1, further comprising: a package substrate (300, Fig. 7, ⁋ [0055]), and wherein the first semiconductor chip (200) is mounted on the package substrate via second conductive bumps (240, ⁋ [0026]) (⁋ [0093]). Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 3-5, and 11-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oh, and further in view of Lee et al. (US 2020/0135594 A1), hereafter “Lee”. As to claim 3, Oh teaches the semiconductor package of claim 1, wherein the flow prevention structures (140D2) include a dummy pad (141 of 140D2, Fig. 1B, ⁋⁋ [0047]-[0048]) and a dummy bump (143 of 140D2, Fig. 1B, ⁋⁋ [0047]-[0048]) on the dummy pad. Oh fails to teach wherein the dummy pad, of the flow prevention structure, is on a test pad. Lee teaches a similar semiconductor package (1a, Fig. 8, ⁋ [0059]) wherein a test pad (TP, ⁋ [0065]) overlaps a dummy pad (DP) (Fig. 8+Fig. 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to apply the teaching of the test pad overlapping a dummy pad as taught by Lee into the device of Oh for the purpose of reducing the thickness of the semiconductor package and efficiently discharge heat in the chips externally through pads coupled to each other while being in contact with each other (⁋ [0103]). As to claim 4, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 3, Oh further teaches wherein the dummy bump (143 of 140D2) includes a same material as the first conductive bumps (143 of 140D1) (⁋ [0048], “dummy bump 140D may include a first dummy bump 140D1 and a second dummy bump 140D2”). As to claim 5, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 3, Oh further teaches wherein the dummy pad (141 of 140D2) includes a same material as the second bonding pads (141 of 140D1) (⁋ [0048], “dummy bump 140D may include a first dummy bump 140D1 and a second dummy bump 140D2”). As to claim 11, Oh teaches a semiconductor package (1000, Fig. 1B, ⁋ [0025]), comprising: a first semiconductor chip (200) including: a first substrate (201, ⁋ [0026]) having a first surface (bottom surface) and a second surface (top surface) opposite to the first surface; a plurality of through electrodes (210) penetrating the first substrate; first bonding pads (230, ⁋ [0026]) on the first surface, wherein the first bonding pads are electrically connected to the plurality of through electrodes (⁋ [0032]); and second bonding pads (212, ⁋ [0029]) on the second surface, wherein the second bonding pads are electrically connected to the plurality of through electrodes (⁋ [0029]); a second semiconductor chip (100) including: a second substrate (101, ⁋ [0039]) having a third surface (bottom surface) and a fourth surface (top surface) opposite to the third surface; a second wiring layer (135, ⁋ [0041]) on the third surface of the second substrate; and third bonding pads (141 of 140D1, ⁋⁋ [0047]-[0048]) on the second wiring layer, wherein the second semiconductor chip (100) is on the second surface of the first substrate (Fig. 1B), wherein the second wiring layer includes redistribution pads (130Pd, ⁋⁋ [0039]-[0042]) and test pads (130Pt, ⁋ [0042]), and wherein the third bonding pads (141 of 140D1) are on the redistribution pads (130Pd) (⁋ [0042], “the dummy pad 130Pd may be a pad on which the first dummy bump 140D1 is provided”); conductive bumps (143 of 140D1, Fig. 1B, ⁋⁋ [0047]-[0048]) between the first semiconductor chip and the second semiconductor chip and electrically connecting the second bonding pads (212) and the third bonding pads (141 of 140D1) (⁋ [0047]); an adhesive layer (150, ⁋ [0025]) between the first semiconductor chip (100) and the second semiconductor chip, wherein the adhesive layer is in a space between the conductive bumps (143 of 140) (Fig. 1B); and flow prevention structures (140D2, ⁋⁋ [0045], [0063]) in the adhesive layer. Oh fails to teach wherein the flow prevention structures overlap the test pads viewed from a plan view, however, Examiner notes that Oh does teach the flow prevention structure comprising of a dummy pad and a dummy bump connected thereto. Lee teaches a similar semiconductor package (1a, Fig. 8, ⁋ [0059]) wherein a test pad (TP, ⁋ [0065]) overlaps a dummy pad (DP) (Fig. 8+Fig. 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to apply the teaching of the test pad overlapping a dummy pad as taught by Lee into the device of Oh for the purpose of reducing the thickness of the semiconductor package and efficiently discharge heat in the chips externally through pads coupled to each other while being in contact with each other (⁋ [0103]). As to claim 12, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 11, Oh further teaches wherein the adhesive layer (150) includes a non-conductive film (NCF) (⁋ [0051]). As to claim 13, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 11, and further teaches wherein the flow prevention structures of Oh (140D2) include a dummy pad (141 of 140D2) on the modified test pads of Lee (TP, Fig. 9, see claim 11) and Oh’s dummy bump (143 of 140D2) on the dummy pad (Fig. 1B of Oh). As to claim 14, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 13, Oh further teaches wherein the dummy bump (143 of 140D2) includes a same material as the conductive bumps (143 of 140D1) (⁋ [0048], “dummy bump 140D may include a first dummy bump 140D1 and a second dummy bump 140D2”). As to claim 15, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 14, Oh further teaches wherein the dummy bump (143 of 140D2) has a diameter same as a diameter of the conductive bumps (143 of 140D1) (⁋ [0079], “the sizes of the second bump 140 and the dummy bump 140D”). As to claim 16, Oh in view of Lee teach the semiconductor package of claim 13, Oh further teaches wherein the dummy pad (141 of 140D2) includes a same material as the third bonding pads (141 of 140D1) (⁋ [0048], “dummy bump 140D may include a first dummy bump 140D1 and a second dummy bump 140D2”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARNELL HUNTER whose telephone number is (571)270-1796. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached on 571-272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARNELL HUNTER III/Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /SUE A PURVIS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12628454
IMAGE SENSOR
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12610584
SELECTIVE GROWTH OF HIGH-K OXIDE ON CHANNEL OF GATE-ALL-AROUND TRANSISTORS
4y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610598
NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12568643
NANOWIRE TRANSISTORS AND METHODS OF FABRICATION
5y 8m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568663
THRESHOLD VOLTAGE TUNING FOR NANORIBBON-BASED TRANSISTORS
4y 3m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.6%)
3y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 63 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month