Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/457,549

CONDUCTIVE AND TRANSPARENT INTERCONNECTION STRUCTURE, ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD AND SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Priority
Aug 29, 2022 — FR 2208619
Examiner
VU, VU A
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
COMMISSARIAT À L'ÉNERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ÉNERGIES ALTERNATIVES
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1258 granted / 1362 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1381
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1362 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Acknowledgment is made that applicant's Amendment, filed on July 21st, 2006, has been entered. Upon entrance of the Amendment, claims 1, 4, and 12 were amended, and claims 2-3 were cancelled. Claims 1 and 4-17 are currently pending. Claim 12 was rejected under 35 U.S.C. l 12(b) as being indefinite. Claim 12 was amended. The rejection of claim12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) have been overcome and are withdrawn. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed July 21st, 2006 with respect to the rejection of claim 13 over reference Sawayama et al. (U.S. Patent No. 6,376,271) have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant has argued “Kimura discloses no projecting electrode portion on an opposite second face at all.” The argument is not persuasive because layer 3 is cited to meet the claim “substrate”, and the electrode 5 does extend from the top surface to the bottom surface of layer 3. Claim Objections Claim 12 objected to because of the following informalities: please remove the word “as” from the last line. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sawayama et al. (U.S. Patent No. 6,376,271). PNG media_image1.png 525 1488 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding to claim 13, Sawayama teaches a method for manufacturing an interconnection structure comprising: providing a substrate formed by a first electrically insulating and optically transparent material, the substrate comprising a first face and an opposite second face, the first face defining a plane of the substrate (Fig. 2(b), element 3; column 9, line 52); arranging, in the substrate, a plurality of through-cavities, passing through the substrate between the first face and the second face of the substrate in parallel to each other, and being spaced apart from each other (Fig. 2(c); column 9, lines 52-54), and forming, in the through-cavities, a plurality of transparent electrodes, said transparent electrodes passing through the substrate from the first face to the second face of the substrate in parallel to each other, and being electrically insulated from each other by the first electrically insulating and optically transparent material (Fig. 2(e), elements 5; column 9, line 55-57, indium tin oxide (ITO) is transparent electrode (column 1, lines 23-24)). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4-11, and 16-17 are allowed. Claims 14-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claim 1, the prior art fails to anticipate or render obvious the claimed limitations including “each transparent electrode comprising an internal portion extending through the substrate from the first face to the second face, the first portion and the second portion each having lateral dimensions strictly greater than lateral dimensions of the internal portion and projecting beyond the first face and the second face, respectively, and wherein the transparent electrodes have an optical transmission coefficient greater than 85% for at least one wavelength in a spectral band between 400 nm and 800 nm” in combination with the limitations recited in claim 1. The statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter was provided in the previous Office Action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU A VU whose telephone number is (571)270-7467. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:00AM - 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHAD M DICKE can be reached at (571) 270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU A VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 21, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751331
SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751258
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751303
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PACKAGING SUBSTRATE AND PACKAGING SUBSTRATE MANUFACTURED THEREBY
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751123
MULTI-CHANNEL VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745663
SINGULATION OF INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE SUBSTRATES WITH GLASS CORES
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.6%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1362 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month