Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/462,883

INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Priority
Sep 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0119540
Examiner
DOAN, NGHIA M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
891 granted / 1024 resolved
+27.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1033
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§103
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1024 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is response to Application 18/462,883 filed on 09/07/2023. Claims 1-20 are pending in the office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As per claims 1, 10, and 16: recited the limitation “prohibition region” which is “surrounding the through-via region in a plan view” and “a power gating cell in the prohibition region” but unclear the role of “a prohibition region” and “a power gating cell” in this structure, they appear as listed elements without functioning or activity of the claim. As per claim 2-9, 11-15, and 17-20 are also rejected because are depended directly or indirectly to claims 1, 10, and 16, respectively. Examiner notes: if the feature or limitation recited of claims 7, 13, and 17 incorporate into the independent claims 1, 10, and 16 that would address the above issue. Prior Arts Lee et al., (U.S. Pat. 7,687,311) Lee teaches an integrated circuit device (‘311, fig. 1-20 and also see col. 1, ll. 25-26, 3D IC) comprising: a first chip (‘311, col. 1, ll. 27-31, two dies (i.e., first chip and second chip) are bonded together and stacked on top each other, hence, include first chip); and a second chip on the first chip (‘311, col. 1, ll. 27-31, two dies (i.e., first chip and second chip) are bonded together and stacked on top each other); wherein the first chip (‘311, col. 1, ll. 27-31) comprises: a first substrate (‘331, fig. 1-20, first substrate 112) comprising a through-via region (‘311, fig. 1-20, through via region 103), and a device region (‘311, fig. 1-20, electrical circuitry 113 and contacts 118); a through-via in the through-via region and in the first substrate (‘311, fig. 1-20, through via 104a in the through-via region 103 and in the first substrate 112); and wherein the second chip (‘311, col. 1, ll. 27-31) comprises: a second substrate (‘331, fig. 7-20, second substrate 204); and a second logic block on the second substrate (‘331, col. 5, ll. 50-51), wherein the second logic block is configured to receive power and/or signals through the through-via (‘331, col. 5, ll. 52-60, transfer of electrical signal between the conductive bump 202 and the corresponding TSV 104, and col. 6, ll. 50-55). Lee does not teach a prohibition region surrounding the through-via region in a plan view and a power gating cell in the prohibition region. Nakayama et al., (U.S. Pat. 6,691,296) Nakayama teaches a power/ground layer detecting unit detects at least one layer, among power and ground layers, to which the detected power and/or ground terminals are connected. A layer detecting unit specifies a layer, among the detected layers, that is nearest to a signal layer on which the conductor is placed. A prohibition area (region) generating unit generates a via prohibition area on the specified layer. As a result, vias are placed on the specified layer, avoiding the via prohibition area (‘296, fig. 1, prohibition area (region) generation unit 1110), a prohibition region surrounding the through-via region in a plan view (‘296, fig. 9-11, via prohibition area 1307 in ground layer 1311 is project in a plan view on signal layer 1301). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filling date of claim invention to combine Nakayama and Lee to modify Lee’s to having Nakayama’s a prohibition area in the power/ground layers to prohibit conductors and vias to be placed in the prohibition area that provides efficiently design with a low noise level (‘296, col. 3, ll. 10-15). However, Lee and Nakayama do not teach a power gating cell in the prohibition region. Patel, Rakesh (U.S. Pat. 8,878,354). Patel teaches a semiconductor package including i) a first semiconductor die and ii) a second semiconductor die vertically stacked on top of the first semiconductor die. The first semiconductor die includes a first electronic component and a second electronic component, in which the first electronic component operates in accordance with power associated with a first power domain, and the second electronic component operates in accordance with power associated with a second power domain. The second semiconductor die is configured to supply the power associated with the first power domain to the first electronic component of the first semiconductor die, and supply the power associated with the second power domain to the second electronic component of the first semiconductor die (‘354, the abstract). Patel also teaches a switching array 608 (power gating cell) (‘354, fig. 6A-9, 608). Patel does not teach a power gating cell (i.e., switching array 608) in the prohibition region. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NGHIA M DOAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5973. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached at 571-272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NGHIA M. DOAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2851 /NGHIA M DOAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743567
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DESIGNING A DISCRETE DEVICE PRODUCT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737622
ANN TRAINING TROUGH PROCESSING POWER OF PARKED VEHICLES
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725037
SYNTHETIC DATA FOR 2D PATHFINDING
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718054
ITERATIVE DATABASE DRIVEN PLACE AND ROUTE FOR COARSE-GRAIN RECONFIGURABLE ARCHITECTURES
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12711298
PRE-PLACEMENT CLOCKING IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION FOR CIRCUIT DESIGNS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1024 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month