Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/463,830

GEAR ASSEMBLY FOR A SIDE STICK UNIT

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Sep 08, 2023
Examiner
MACARTHUR, VICTOR L
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ratier-Figeac SAS
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
697 granted / 1059 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1093
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1059 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/6/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 5 is unclear as to whether “at least one fixation device” (lines 1-2 of claim 5) is to refer to the same element as previously recited in claim 1 or to an additional element. See MPEP 2173.05(o) which states "where a claim directed to a device can be read to include the same element twice, the claim may be indefinite". Claim 6 depends from claim 5 and is thus similarly unclear/rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5-7 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Damas US4660432. Claims 1 and 11. A gear assembly for a side stick on an aircraft (in that the gear assembly is capable of performing such intended functional use in accordance with MPEP 2112.01 and 2114), the gear assembly comprising: a first gear (6, 8, 10); a second gear (2) configured to engage with the first gear; and a viscoelastic material (13, 17) provided in the first gear; wherein the first gear includes a first portion (6) and as second portion (8 and/or 10), and wherein the first portion and the second portion are separate and distinct parts that are configured to move axially relative to each other during operation (e.g., via loosening/tightening of V), and wherein each of the first portion and the second portion comprises an engagement surface (12a, 12b and/or 12c) configured to engage with an engagement surface (4) of the second gear, wherein the first portion and the second portion are separated by a gap (gap between 6 and 8; and/or gap between 6 and 10), wherein the viscoelastic material is provided in the gap; at least one fixation device (14 and/or 15 and V), wherein the at least one fixation device passes completely through the viscoelastic material between an inner and outer radius of the viscoelastic material (via 14), wherein the at least one fixation device also passes through the first portion, the second portion and the gap between the first portion and the second portion and connects the first and second portions while allowing for axial motion between the first and second portions (via at least portion 14 of 14/15/V). Claims 5. Wherein at least one fixation device (14 and/or 15 and/or V, see 35 USC 112 rejection) is provided through the first portion and through the second portion. Claim 6. The gear assembly of claim 5, wherein the at least one fixation device is a bolt (V is a bolt within the broadest reasonable interpretation since it is a threaded fastener for holding parts together) or a rivet (14 is a rivet within the broadest reasonable interpretation since it is a pin for holding parts together). Claim 7. The gear assembly of claim 1, wherein the first gear includes a plurality of first gear teeth (teeth of 12a, 12b and/or 12c). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6 and 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Damas US4660432. Claim 6. As detailed in the 35 USC 102 rejections elsewhere above, the Damas fixation device is a bolt or rivet within the broadest reasonable interpretation of the terms. In the interest of compact prosecution, if applicant intends to limit toward a --deformed-- rivet and/or a bolt with a --nut threaded thereon--, the examiner takes Official Notice that such was known to be desirable in the fixation art for increasing fastening force/strength. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify as such. Claim 8. The gear assembly of claim 7, wherein the examiner takes Official Notice that helical gear teeth were know to be non-parallel to the gear axis and to be quieter in operation than parallel teeth. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify as such. Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Damas US4660432 in view of Breuning DE19713245 and Voiles US10118688. Damas does not expressly disclose using the gear assembly with a side stick of a side stick assembly of an aircraft. However: Breuning teaches that it was well known to be desirable for aircraft to have a side stick assembly (para.3 of the English translation attached to this Office Action) and for side stick assemblies to use gear assemblies (11, 12, 13) with a side stick (2); and/or Voiles teaches that it was well known to be desirable for gear assemblies (305/311, 205, 209) to have utility with the side stick (203) of a side stick assembly of an aircraft (col.4, ll.20-31). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Damas gear assembly to be used with a side stick of a side stick assembly of an aircraft, as taught by Breuning and/or Voiles, for the purpose of increasing the utility of the Hetzel gear assembly. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICTOR L MACARTHUR whose telephone number is (571)272-7085. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /VICTOR L MACARTHUR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 08, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
May 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 07, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Aug 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Jan 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590628
DUAL GEARBOX CENTRAL BEARING LAYOUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590632
MODULAR SHIFTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589831
REVERSE GEAR APPARATUS FOR HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12560220
SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR AN ELECTRIC POWERTRAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560234
Motor Vehicle Having a Coupling Mechanism and a Functionally Secured Parking Lock Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+13.4%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1059 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month