Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/465,583

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 12, 2023
Examiner
KUSUMAKAR, KAREN M
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
838 granted / 962 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
983
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 962 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims As of the amendment filed 3/20/26, claims 21 and 22 have been added, claims 17 and 19 have been canceled, and claim 16 has been amended. Therefore, claims 1-18 and 20-22 remain pending, with claims 1, 8, and 16 being independent. Claim Objections Claim 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim ends with “conductive”. It should end with “conductive feature”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16, 18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Choi (US 2023/0369111). As to claim 16, Choi teaches a semiconductor device (fig. 18), comprises: a substrate (110, fig. 1, [0021]); a transistor over the substrate (, fig. 1, [0021]); an interlayer dielectric layer (14) over the transistor (fig. 18, [0025]); an inter-metal dielectric layer (24) over and in contact with the interlayer dielectric layer (14, fig. 18, [0026]); a conductive feature (27-1 or 27-2) extending through the inter-metal dielectric layer (24, [0027]), wherein a top surface of the conductive feature is narrower than a bottom surface of the conductive feature (fig. 18); and dielectric liners (26) on opposite sidewalls of the conductive feature (fig. 18, [0035]). As to claim 18, Choi further teaches a dielectric constant of the inter-metal dielectric layer (24, low-k material, [0031]) is lower than a dielectric constant of the dielectric liners (26, SiN, [0035]). As to claim 20, Choi further teaches the conductive feature (27-1 or 27-2) includes a trapezoid cross-sectional profile (fig. 18). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 are allowed and claims 21-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art taken either singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitations of the claims listed above in such a manner that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 would be proper. The prior art fails to teach a combination of all of the features in the claims. As to claims 1-15, see office action dated 12/23/25 for reasons for allowance. As to claim 21, Choi fails to teach the bottom surface of the conductive feature, bottom ends of the dielectric liners, and a bottom surface of the inter-metal dielectric layer are coterminous. Claim 22 is allowable at least because it depends from allowable claim 21. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any response to this Office Action should be faxed to (571) 273-8300 or mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand-Delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22313 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAREN M KUSUMAKAR whose telephone number is (571)270-3520. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday from 7:30a – 4:30p EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fernando Toledo can be reached on 571-272-1867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAREN KUSUMAKAR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897 3/30/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 20, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672545
APPARATUSES AND METHODS INCLUDING STRUCTURES IN SCRIBE REGIONS OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672537
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES INCLUDING CONTACT PLUGS HAVING SILICIDE LAYERS AND METHODS FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666944
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE WITH CONDUCTIVE VIA STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660592
INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652936
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.8%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 962 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month