Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/467,911

FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 15, 2023
Examiner
SEVEN, EVREN
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
532 granted / 723 resolved
+5.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
752
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 723 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Detailed Action The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species A, directed at the embodiment of Fig. 3A, is acknowledged. However, Claim 10 has not been withdrawn. Claim 10 is directed towards the GaN layer 15 having a pGaN portion 15-1 and an nGaN portion 15-2, which appears in Figs. 8a-8d which are incongruous with the embodiment of Fig. 3A. Therefore, claims 10-12 are considered withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 7, 9 and 14-16are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 20210336045 to Oh et al. (Oh). Regarding Claims 1, 2, 14 and 16, Oh teaches in Fig. 2 at least, a field effect transistor, (FET) device, and an associated method comprising: a substrate 110; a gallium nitride (GaN) structure 140, [0082] covering a portion of the substrate; a gate metal layer 150/160 on top of the GaN structure; wherein the gate metal layer comprises: at least one first section 150 being formed from a first material composition [0085], and a second section 160 being formed from a second material composition that is different from the first material composition [0088]; wherein a first interface between the GaN structure and the at least one first section of the gate metal layer has ohmic contact properties [0085]; and wherein a second interface between the GaN structure and the second section of the gate metal layer has non-ohmic (Schottky, relevant to Claims 14 and 16) contact properties [0086]. Regarding Claims 7 and 15, Oh teaches the FET device of Claim 1 and method of Claim 14 wherein the at least one first section of the gate metal layer is formed from a first metal stack [0085], and/or wherein the second section of the gate metal layer is formed from a second metal stack [0088]. Regarding Claim 9, Oh teaches the FET device of Claim 1 wherein the GaN structure comprises a p-doped GaN, pGaN, layer [0085]. Regarding Claim 13, Oh teaches the FET device of Claim 1 wherein the FET device(10) is a GaN-gate high electron mobility transistor, HEMT,(HEMT) device. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 8 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oh. Regarding Claims 3 and 17, Oh teaches the FET device of Claim 1 and method of Claim 14 but does not explicitly teach that the first interface makes up less than 10% of a total interface area between the GaN structure and the gate metal layer, the total interface area comprising the first interface and the second interface. However, Oh teaches that the ratio between the Schottky and Ohmic regions directly affects leakage current [0090] and is therefore a result effective variable that may be optimized by the person of ordinary skill to achieve application specific results (MPEP 2144.05(II)). Regarding Claim 8, Oh teaches the FET device of Claim 7 but does not explicitly teach that the first metal stack and/or the second metal stack comprises any one of the following material combinations: Ni/Au, Ni/Ag, Pd/Au, Cr/Au, Pt/Au, Ti/Pt/Au, Ni/Si, W/Si, Ti/Al, Ti/Al/Ti, or TiN/Al/TiN. However, Oh teaches throughout the importance of the differing work function between the first 150 and second 160 portions of the gate metal and the depletion forming layer 140 in contact. Oh further teaches that either portion may be formed of various materials to achieve that end [0085,0088]. Therefore, the person of ordinary skill having the benefit of Oh may select materials according to the teachings of Oh to achieve the stated benefits and arrive at the various combinations claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EVREN SEVEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5666. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00- 5:00 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571) 272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EVREN SEVEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604709
PROBE CARD CONFIGURED TO CONNECT TO A PROBE PAD LOCATED IN SAW STREET OF A SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598748
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598701
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SELECTION STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586736
MEMS SWITCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588324
PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND FORMING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 723 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month