Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/468,556

Reduction of Edge Transistor Leakage on N-Type EDMOS and LDMOS Devices

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 15, 2023
Examiner
DINKE, BITEW A
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
555 granted / 764 resolved
+4.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
803
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
91.5%
+51.5% vs TC avg
§102
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 764 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Specification Amendment to the Specification filed on 04/09/2026 has been reviewed and entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 and 12-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Applicant Admitted Prior Art, Figs.1A-1C (U.S. 2025/0098286 A1, hereinafter refer to AAPA) in view of Kitagawa et al. (U.S. 2006/0231894 A1, hereinafter refer to Kitagawa) and Ebina (U.S. 2001/0015461 A1, hereinafter refer to Ebina). Regarding Claim 1: AAPA discloses an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1C as shown below and ¶ [0001]) and including: PNG media_image1.png 313 558 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 483 532 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 316 566 media_image3.png Greyscale (a) a source region (S) (see AAPA, Figs.1A and 1B as shown above) (b) at least one end-cap body contact region (142) doped to have a first semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Figs.1B and 1C as shown above); (c) a drift region doped to have a second semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Figs.1A- 1C as shown above); and (d) a gate structure (G) partially overlying the at least one end-cap body contact regions region (142), the gate structure (G) including a conductive layer (108) having a third semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Figs.1B and 1C as shown above), AAPA is silent upon explicitly disclosing (b) at least one end-cap body contact region doped to have a first semiconductor characteristic and positioned outside of the source region; wherein (d) a gate structure partially overlying the at least one end-cap body contact regions region and the drift region. For support see Kitagawa, which teaches wherein (b) at least one end-cap body contact region (6) doped to have a first semiconductor characteristic and positioned outside of the source region (5) (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown below and ¶ [0102]- ¶ [0109]); (c) a gate structure (15) partially overlying the at least one end-cap body contact regions region (6) and the drift region (18) (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown below and ¶ [0102]- ¶ [0109]). PNG media_image4.png 335 583 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 451 569 media_image5.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of AAPA and Kitagawa to enable the AAPA’s at least one end-cap body contact region doped to be positioned outside of the source region and the gate structure partially overlying the at least one end-cap body contact regions region and the drift region as taught by Kitagawa in order to improve the avalanche withstand value and switching withstand value. The combination of AAPA and Kitagawa is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein the conductive layer including a first side oriented towards the at least one end-cap body contact region and doped to have the first semiconductor characteristic. For support see Ebina, which teaches wherein the conductive layer (24/76/78) including a first side oriented towards the at least one end-cap body contact region (16) and doped to have the first semiconductor characteristic (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown below and ¶ [0009]). PNG media_image6.png 493 481 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 510 427 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 293 552 media_image8.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina to enable the conductive layer of the combination of AAPA and Kitagawa to include a first side oriented towards the at least one end-cap body contact region and doped to have the first semiconductor characteristic as taught by Ebina in order to achieve a lower power consumption, even during use under conditions of a comparatively high gate voltage. Regarding Claim 2: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the second semiconductor characteristic is an N− type (see AAPA, Fig.1C as shown above). Regarding Claim 3: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer (50) is polysilicon, the third semiconductor characteristic is an N+ type, and the first semiconductor characteristic is a P+ type (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]). Regarding Claim 4: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer (G) further includes a second side near the drift region (141), wherein the second side is doped to have a fourth semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1C as shown above). Regarding Claim 5: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 4 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer (24/76/78) is polysilicon (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]), the third semiconductor characteristic is an N+ type, the first semiconductor characteristic is a P+ type, and the fourth semiconductor characteristic is an N type (see combination of AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above, Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above, and Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]). Regarding Claim 6: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the integrated circuit further includes a field-effect transistor region between the end-cap body contact regions (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above). Regarding Claim 7: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 6 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the integrated circuit includes an active layer having a thin region and a thick region, wherein the field-effect transistor region is fabricated in and on the thin region and the end-cap body contact regions are fabricated on the thick region (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above). Regarding Claim 8: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer of the gate structure is fabricated to have at least two levels in series between the first side of the conductive layer and an opposing second side of the conductive layer (see AAPA, Fig.1C as shown above). Regarding Claim 9: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein a portion of the drift region near the gate structure is doped to have a fifth semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1C as shown above). Regarding Claim 10: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 9 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the fifth semiconductor characteristic is a P-type (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1C as shown above). Regarding Claim 12: AAPA discloses an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1C as shown above and ¶ [0001]) and including: (a) a source region (S) (see AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above); (b) a drift region (141) (see AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above); (c) a gate structure (G) including a first side adjacent the source region, a second side adjacent the drift region, and first and second edges perpendicular to the first and second sides (see AAPA, Figs.1A and 1C as shown above); (d) a drain region (D) adjacent the drift region (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1B as shown above); the gate structure (G) including a conductive layer having a second semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Figs.1A-1C as shown above). AAPA is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein (e) first and second body contact regions positioned outside of the source region and partially underlying respective ones of the first and second edges of the gate structure and doped to have a first semiconductor characteristic; wherein the first and second edges of the gate structure partially overlay respective ones of the first and second body contact regions and the drift region. For support see Kitagawa, which teaches wherein (e) first and second body contact regions (6) positioned outside of the source region (5) and partially underlying respective ones of the first and second edges of the gate structure (15) and doped to have a first semiconductor characteristic (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above and ¶ [0102]- ¶ [0109]); wherein the first and second edges of the gate structure (15) partially overlay respective ones of the first and second body contact regions (6) and the drift region (18) (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above and ¶ [0102]- ¶ [0109]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of AAPA and Kitagawa to enable the first and second body contact regions to be positioned outside of the source region and partially underlying respective ones of the first and second edges of the gate structure and doped to have a first semiconductor characteristic and the first and second edges of the gate structure to partially overlay respective ones of the first and second body contact regions and the drift region as taught by Kitagawa in order to improve the avalanche withstand value and switching withstand value. The combination of AAPA and Kitagawa is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein the conductive layer including a first side doped near the first and second body contact regions to have the first semiconductor characteristic. For support see, Ebina, which teaches wherein the conductive layer (24/76/78) including a side doped near the body contact regions (16) to have the first semiconductor characteristic (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0009]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina to enable the conductive layer of the combination of AAPA and Kitagawa to include a side doped near the body contact regions to have the first semiconductor characteristic as taught by Ebina in order to achieve a lower power consumption, even during use under conditions of a comparatively high gate voltage. Hence, practicing the combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina to modify the combination of AAPA and Kitagawa to include a side doped near the body contact regions to have the first semiconductor characteristic as taught by Ebina necessarily results the combination of AAPA and Kitagawa conductive layer to include “a first side doped near the first and second body contact regions to have the first semiconductor characteristic” as now specified in claim 12. Regarding Claim 13: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the drift region has an N− type characteristic (see AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above). Regarding Claim 14: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer (24/76/78) is polysilicon, the second semiconductor characteristic is an N+ type, and the first semiconductor characteristic is a P+ type (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]). Regarding Claim 15: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer further includes a second side near the drift region (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above and ¶ [0102]- ¶ [0109]), wherein the second side is doped to have a third semiconductor characteristic (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]). Regarding Claim 16: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 15 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer (24/79/78) is polysilicon (see Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]), the second semiconductor characteristic is an N+ type, the first semiconductor characteristic is a P+ type, and the third semiconductor characteristic is an N type (see combination of AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above, Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above, and Ebina, Figs1-2 as shown above and ¶ [0126]). Regarding Claim 17: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the integrated circuit further includes a field-effect transistor region between the first and second end-cap body contact regions (6) (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above). Regarding Claim 18: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 17 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the integrated circuit includes an active layer having a thin region and a thick region, wherein the field-effect transistor region is fabricated in and on the thin region and the first and second end-cap body contact regions (6) are fabricated on respective portions of the thick region (see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above). Regarding Claim 19: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the conductive layer of the gate structure is fabricated to have at least two levels in series between the first side and the second side of the conductive layer (see AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above). Regarding Claim 20: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein a portion of the drift region near the gate structure is doped to have a fourth semiconductor characteristic (see AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above and/or see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above). Regarding Claim 21: AAPA as modified teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate as set forth in claim 20 as above. The combination of AAPA, Kitagawa, and Ebina further teaches wherein the fourth semiconductor characteristic is a P-type (see AAPA, Fig.1A as shown above and/or see Kitagawa, Figs.14A-14B as shown above). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BITEW A DINKE whose telephone number is (571)272-0534. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 a.m. - 5 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at (571)272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BITEW A DINKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 15, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 09, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641899
COLOR SEPARATION ELEMENT AND IMAGE SENSOR INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641954
MEASURING METHOD AND MEASURING DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633258
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622031
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12622057
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURE METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY APPARATUS
4y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 764 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month