Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/472,718

AIRCRAFT LONGITUDINAL CONTROL SURFACE, LONGITUDINAL CONTROL AUGMENTATION SYSTEM FOR AIRCRAFT, AND AIRCRAFT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Priority
Mar 24, 2021 — CIP of PCTBR2021050124
Examiner
HESTON, JUSTIN MICHAEL
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Embraer S A
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
174 granted / 214 resolved
+29.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
232
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
87.9%
+47.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 214 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/15/2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed 12/15/2025 has been entered. Claim 1 is amended. Claim 2 is cancelled. Claims 1, 3-10 remain pending in the application. Examiner appreciates the thorough explanation of the invention and amendments provided in the applicant’s response and interview. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-8 of Applicant’s remarks, filed 9/15/2025, with respect to independent claims 3 and 7 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 3 and 7 have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments regarding amended claim 1 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive for the following reasons: Applicant asserts “Brislawn does not disclose the join is hinged up and down with respect to the engine connecting structure in varying deflection angles…the office action seems to be interpreting “deflection” as simply moving up and down. However, broadest reasonable interpretations of claim terms must be consistent with the specification.” Examiner asserts that ¶ [0028] of the instant application reads, “In this way, this longitudinal control augmentation surface 30 is pivotable up and down relative to the connecting structure 20, at variable deflection angles (b) upwards or downwards”. Thus, Brislawn’s deflection simply moving up and down between two positions satisfies Applicant’s limitation in view of the specification under broadest reasonable interpretation. As such, amended claim 1 remains rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Brislawn (WO 9821092 A1). Regarding claim 1, Brislawn teaches a Longitudinal control augmentation surface of an aircraft with engines arranged in a rear portion of a fuselage (Figure 1), the aircraft comprising a primary control surface located in a horizontal tail of the aircraft (Figure 1, unlabeled elevator elements located on horizontal tail. Supported in Col. 6, lines 25-29, “present invention conceived as a device to assist the elevator in deep-stall recovery, but it also supplements the airplane-nose-down elevator power when the pylon flaps are deflected.” Col. 8, lines 9-28, “existing elevator system of a conventional T-tailed aircraft”), the longitudinal control augmentation surface comprising a secondary control surface (Figures 1-2a, elements 30, 32) that cooperates with and complements the primary control surface located in the horizontal tail (Col. 6, lines 25-29 and Col. 8, lines 9-28), wherein the longitudinal control augmentation surface is positioned close to a trailing edge of an engine connecting structure in the fuselage (Figure 1) on a joint that can be hinged up and down in relation to the engine connecting structure (Figure 2a) in response to a longitudinal control command from the aircraft (Col. 6, line 16- Col. 7 line-35), wherein the joint is hinged up and down with respect to the engine connecting structure in varying deflection angles (δ) commanded by a pilot or an automatic control system of the aircraft (Col. 7, lines 4-12). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN MICHAEL HESTON whose telephone number is (571)272-3099. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays and Wednesdays: 0500-1300, Tuesdays 0500-1400, Thursdays and Fridays by appointment only.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy D Collins can be reached at 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN MICHAEL HESTON/Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Oct 31, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 31, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 17, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630265
FOLDING MARINE CLEAT WITH FASTENER RETENTION
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12612167
LOW-POWER ICE PROTECTION SYSTEM HAVING ZONED THERMAL ELEMENTS INTEGRATED WITH ZONED VIBRATION ELEMENTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12612165
SEAT RAIL AND A SEAT MOUNTING SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611942
HIGH POWER DISTRIBUTION ARCHITECTURES
1y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599236
BENCH
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 214 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month