Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/474,348

Semiconductor Device And Electronic Apparatus

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHIEM D
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1872 granted / 2187 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
2260
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2187 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 2022-153602, filed on 09/27/2022. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/25/2024 and 09/26/2023. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In Claim 4, line 4, the recitation of “a maximum frequency of the frequency band” it is not clear since the frequency band is not clearly defined and the frequency band is lack of antecedent basis. Further clarification is needed. In Claim 5, line 7, the recitation of “a second frequency band other than the first frequency band included in the frequency band” it is not clear since the in claim 5 which cited first frequency band and second frequency band, however the frequency band is not clearly defined since the frequency band appears lack of antecedent basis. Further clarification is needed. In Claim 6, line 9, similarly, the recitation of “the frequency band” is also unclear, thus Claim 6 is rejected as well in the same manner as discussed in claim 5 above. It is noted that Claim 1, line 19, which states “a preset frequency band”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 & 7-8 are allowed. Upon conclusion of a comprehensive search of the pertinent prior art, the Office indicates that the claims are allowable. The prior art when taken alone, or, in combination, cannot be construed as reasonably teaching or suggesting all of the elements of the claimed invention as arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the Applicant. Added primarily for emphasis, the claim recitations “ a test signal generation circuit configured to modulate a test signal in which a frequency is changed in a preset frequency band to generate a third modulated signal and a fourth modulated signal in a second operation mode; and a peak frequency detection circuit configured to measure a potential difference between the first output terminal and the second output terminal” and “ detect a frequency range including a peak frequency that is the frequency of the test signal at which an impedance of the sound reproduction device peaks in the second operation mode” and “a plurality of inverter circuits each having an output terminal coupled to the first output terminal, the second amplifier circuit includes a plurality of inverter circuits” in claim 1 is not found in the prior art of record. Claims 2-3 and 7-8 are allowable as being dependent of claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claims 4-6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Reference (US 7262658 B2) to Ramaswamy et al. discloses in Fig. 2 a Class-D amplifier system comprising, output stages 90 & 118 and a pair of integrators 80 and 82 and wherein dual integrator loop filter 80, 82 drives a comparator 84 and the comparator 84 compares a first integrator filter signal 85 with the output 86 of the loop filter to provide a corresponding quantized output signal at a comparator output 88 and the quantized output signal at 88 is a PWM and Col. 2, lines 20-24, an audio amplifier system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHIEM D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3941. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00 AM-5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANDREA J LINDGREN BALTZELL can be reached at (571)272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHIEM D NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603626
MULTI-PHASE-BASED DOHERTY POWER AMPLIFIER METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599329
Sense Amplifer For a Physiological Sensor and/or Other Sensors
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599000
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING FIRST AND SECOND MONITORING CHANNEL STRUCTURES AND NON-VOLATILE MEMORY SYSTEM COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599018
PACKAGE STRUCTURE WITH ENHANCEMENT STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592674
SELF-BIAS SIGNAL GENERATING CIRCUIT USING DIFFERENTIAL SIGNAL AND RECEIVER INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month