Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/474,372

MACRO MODEL OF A SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE, A CIRCUIT DESIGN SIMULATION PROGRAM, AND A CIRCUIT DESIGN SIMULATOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 26, 2023
Priority
Mar 29, 2021 — JP 2021-054932 +1 more
Examiner
PARIHAR, SUCHIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rohm Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1024 granted / 1167 resolved
+27.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1181
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§102
70.9%
+30.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1167 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. This Non-Final office action is in response to application 18/474,372, application filed on 09/26/2023. Claims 1-11 are currently pending in this application. Priority 3. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement 4. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/26/2023 and 02/20/2026, respectively, is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-5, 7 and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Abbas et al. (US PG Pub No. 2022/0092246). 7. With respect to claim 1, Abbas teaches: A macro model of a semiconductor integrated circuit device for use on a circuit design simulator (see macro model, Abstract; using macro model for simulation, para 39; see simulations for real-time model, para 13), comprising: a plurality of functional blocks (see one or more macro blocks, para 15; see compiler based design of analog blocks, para 24) configured to approximately or equivalently represent characteristics of the semiconductor integrated circuit device on the circuit design simulator (analog circuit design a circuit design representation of analog macro, para 47; prototype providing same functionality, para 48); and a characteristics setting block configured to set (see parameter data set, para 45; setting parameters such as those of supply voltage, temperature conditions, etc, para 46; see combination of parameter values, para 46), using array data derived from evaluation measurement data obtained by actual measurement with the semiconductor integrated circuit device (see input/output parameters of simulation matrix/array, para 14; see simulation data set, para 45; data set of parameters like power, voltage, and temperature, par 45), at least one internal parameter out of a plurality of internal parameters set in the plurality of functional blocks (configuring parameters of analog macro blocks to behavioral/architectural implementation of analog circuitry, para 16). 8. With respect to claim 2, Abbas teaches: The macro model according to claim 1, wherein the characteristics setting block is configured to receive at least one operation condition parameter related to operation conditions of the semiconductor integrated circuit device (see temperature conditions, para 14; see outputs exposed to different processes based on testing, such as supply voltage, temperature conditions, para 23), and to set the at least one internal parameter such that the characteristics of the semiconductor integrated circuit device on the circuit design simulator reflect the at least one operation condition parameter (see selected analog macro from derivation module, macro of op-amp, same functionality, based on independent/dependent parameters, para 39). 9. With respect to claim 4, Abbas teaches: The macro model according to claim 2, wherein the at least one operation condition parameter includes at least one of a supply voltage, a reference voltage, an ambient temperature, an internal temperature, and a load current with respect to the semiconductor integrated circuit device (see parameter data set, para 45; setting parameters such as those of supply voltage, temperature conditions, etc, para 46; see combination of parameter values, para 46). 10. With respect to claim 5, Abbas teaches: The macro model according to claim 1, wherein the characteristics setting block is configured to receive a characteristics variation parameter related to characteristics variation of the semiconductor integrated circuit device (see dataset, parameter variations, para 45-46), to generate characteristics variation array data reflecting the characteristics variation based on the array data and the characteristics variation parameter (see dataset, parameter variations, para 45-46), and to set the at least one internal parameter using the characteristics variation array data (see parameter variation, supply voltage, temperature conditions, para 45-46). 11. With respect to claim 7, Abbas teaches: The macro model according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor integrated circuit device is an operational amplifier (see op-amp, para 39). 12. With respect to claim 10, Abbas teaches: A circuit design simulation program to be executed by a computer including a calculation portion to make the computer function as a circuit design simulator, the program including the macro model according to claim 1, the program making the computer simulate a response of a semiconductor integrated circuit device on the circuit design simulator (see circuit simulation, see rejection of claim 1 above). 13. With respect to claim 11, Abbas teaches: A circuit design simulator that is implemented by a computer executing the circuit design simulation program according to claim 10 (see simulation program, quick design prototyping and programmable design adaption, para 22-25). Allowable Subject Matter 14. Claims 3, 6 and 8-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 15. With respect to claim 3, the prior art made of record fails to teach the combination of steps recited in independent claim 3, including the following particular combination of steps as recited in claim 3, as follows: wherein the array data is a one- or multi-dimensional lookup table in which the at least one operation condition parameter is associated with the at least one internal parameter. 16. With respect to claim 6, the prior art made of record fails to teach the combination of steps recited in independent claim 6, including the following particular combination of steps as recited in claim 6, as follows: wherein the characteristics setting block is configured to interpolate, for the at least one internal parameter, an intermediate value of two set values derived from the array data. 17. With respect to claims 8-9, the prior art made of record fails to teach the combination of steps recited in independent claim 8, including the following particular combination of steps as recited in claim 8, as follows: wherein the plurality of functional blocks include a power supply block that represents a DC gain of the operational amplifier, and a filter block that represents a band width of the operational amplifier. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUCHIN PARIHAR whose telephone number is (703)756-1970. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached on 571-272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUCHIN PARIHAR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683411
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CHARGING FOR DEVICE IDENTIFICATION, ADDITION AND/OR CHANGE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682143
IDENTIFYING RTL CODE THAT CAN BE A SOURCE OF VERIFICATION COMPLEXITY FOR DOWNSTREAM EQUIVALENCE CHECKERS AND GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE RUNTIME OF EQUIVALENCE CHECKERS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675623
TIMING OPTIMIZATION METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON OUTPUT TRANSITION CONSTRAINTS, AND COMPUTER DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662008
Electric Vehicle Charging System
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12645856
CREATION OF REDUCED FORMAL MODEL FOR SCALABLE SYSTEM-ON-CHIP (SOC) LEVEL CONNECTIVITY VERIFICATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1167 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month