Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/476,040

WHEEL MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 27, 2023
Examiner
WILHELM, TIMOTHY
Art Unit
3617
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
DENSO CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
866 granted / 1104 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1143
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1104 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bluethmann et al (US 2015/0083508). Bluethmann discloses: With regard to claim 1 - A wheel module for a vehicle including at least two independently steered wheels to be steered independently, the wheel module comprising: a tire 18 having a side wall defined as a side surface and a tread face defined as a front surface facing frontward of the vehicle (see Fig. 5); a steering unit 80 configured to output a steering force for the tire; a driving unit 72 configured to output a driving force for the tire; a braking unit 50B configured to output a braking force for the tire; and a suspension mechanism 37 supported by an upper end fulcrum 39 and a lower end fulcrum 39 (see Fig. 6) so as to reduce vibration or impact transmitted from a road surface, wherein the suspension mechanism 37 includes a rod-shaped damper and a coil-shaped spring in which the rod-shaped damper is inserted (see Fig. 4), an imaginary straight line extending along a vertical direction and passing through a center of the tire in a radial direction and in a width direction of the tire is defined as a tire central axis, and the lower end fulcrum 49 of the suspension mechanism 37 is positioned away from the tire central axis when viewed from a side surface of the tire (see Figs. 4-6 and 8). With regard to claim 3 - further comprising an arm 74 connecting the steering unit 80 and the tire 18, wherein a steering force output by the steering unit 80 is transmitted to the tire via the arm 74. With regard to claim 4 - wherein the arm has an upper arm 74 adjacent to the steering unit 80 and a rocker arm 75 adjacent to the tire 18, the upper arm 74 and the rocker arm 75 are connected to each other so as to be rotatable about an arm coupling axis 19 extending in a horizontal direction, the arm coupling axis 19 is separated from the tire central axis when viewed from a side surface of the tire 18 (see Fig. 5), the upper end fulcrum 39 of the suspension mechanism 37 is rotatably supported by the upper arm 74, and the lower end fulcrum 39 is rotatably supported by the rocker arm 75, and the lower end fulcrum 39 of the suspension mechanism 37 is rotatable about the arm coupling axis 19 in a plane parallel to a side surface of the tire 18 (see Fig. 5). With regard to claim 5 - wherein a positional relationship between the tire 18 and the suspension mechanism 37 is maintained when the tire 18 is steered. With regard to claim 6 - wherein a kingpin axis 21 and the tire central axis coincide with each other when viewed from a front surface of the tire (see Fig. 5). With regard to claim 7 - wherein the steering unit 80 includes a steering motor 95 that outputs torque, and a speed reducer 54 that reduces rotation of the steering motor and transmits the rotation to the arm (“[0048] A steering hub 86 may be positioned adjacent to the encoder read disc 48 and to a speed reducing gear set 54. In one possible embodiment, the speed reducing gear set 54 shown in FIG. 7 provides a steering speed reduction ratio of at least 50:1. In another embodiment, the reduction may be at least 100:1, e.g., reducing a 2000 RPM steering input speed to a 20 RPM actual steering speed as transmitted to the drive wheel 18. This reduction in turn amplifies steering torque, as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Such steering reducer devices such as the speed reducing gear set 54 providing the desired gear reduction are commercially available off-the-shelf components, and thus are not further described herein. Other steering reduction ratios may be used without departing from the intended inventive scope.”). With regard to claim 8 - wherein the steering motor includes a multi-winding motor having a plurality of winding sets in a redundant manner (“[0050] The seal 57 shown in FIG. 7 seals against a steering motor stack 90. The steering motor stack 90 includes a motor support race 92 and a dual-wound stator 94 having two sets of windings W1 and W2, with only a portion of the windings W1 and W2 shown schematically for illustrative simplicity.”). Claim(s) 1, 2, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsunoda (JP 2014-210558) in view of Bluethmann. Tsunoda discloses: With regard to claim 1 - A wheel module for a vehicle including at least two independently steered wheels to be steered independently, the wheel module comprising: a tire W having a side wall defined as a side surface and a tread face defined as a front surface facing frontward of the vehicle (see Fig. 3); a steering unit 4 configured to output a steering force for the tire; a driving unit 3 configured to output a driving force for the tire; and a suspension mechanism 60 supported by an upper end fulcrum P3 and a lower end fulcrum P2 (see Fig. 2) so as to reduce vibration or impact transmitted from a road surface, wherein the suspension mechanism 60 includes a rod-shaped damper (see Fig. 2), an imaginary straight line S1 extending along a vertical direction and passing through a center of the tire W in a radial direction and in a width direction of the tire is defined as a tire central axis, and the lower end fulcrum P3 of the suspension mechanism 60 is positioned away from the tire central axis S1 when viewed from a side surface of the tire W (see Fig. 2). Tsunoda fails to explicitly disclose a braking unit 50B configured to output a braking force for the tire, and a coil-shaped spring in which the rod-shaped damper is inserted. As seen in the rejection above, Bluethmann teaches the claimed wheel module, including a braking unit 50B configured to output a braking force for the tire, and a coil-shaped spring in which the rod-shaped damper is inserted. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was fled to modify the wheel module of Tsunoda with the teaching of Bluethmann so as to include a braking module and a coil-shaped spring surrounding the rod-shaped damper, with a reasonable expectation of success, to ensure the vehicle may properly decelerate and stop when needed and to allow for better cushion of the vehicle against road noise. With regard to claim 2, Tsunoda discloses wherein the suspension mechanism 60 is inclined with respect to the tire central axis S1 when viewed from a side surface of the tire (see Fig. 2). With regard to claim 9, Tsunoda discloses wherein the wheel module is an independently steered wheel for a vehicle 1 having at least one front wheel W and at least one rear wheel W, wherein the suspension mechanism 60 in the wheel module for a front wheel W is provided on a front side of the vehicle with respect to the tire central axis S1, and the suspension mechanism 60 in the wheel module for a rear wheel W is provided on a rear side of the vehicle with respect to the tire central axis S1 ( see Fig. 1A). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY WILHELM whose telephone number is (571)272-6980. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Dickson can be reached at 571-272-7742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY WILHELM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 January 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594201
AUXILIARY DRIVE DEVICE FOR A WHEELCHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594828
ELECTRIC WORK VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589795
STEERING-ASSISTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589825
TRAINING BICYCLE AND BICYCLE FRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12539933
Bicycle
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1104 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month