Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/476,499

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION IN MEMRISTOR-BASED IN-MEMORY COMPUTING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Priority
Oct 11, 2022 — provisional 63/415,147
Examiner
NGUYEN, VAN THU T
Art Unit
2824
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
The University of Hong Kong
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
796 granted / 961 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
995
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to 04/08/2026 Amendment. Claims 2, 4-17 are pending and examined. Claim 3 has been cancelled. Claim 1 is withdrawn from consideration. Drawings The drawings are objected to because of the following reason. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings appear to be low resolution. The text and figures are too blurry to read out easily. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 4-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Examiner is unable to understand the claimed features due to blurry drawings. Claims 4-17 are temporary not considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 11,615,299 to Mochida et al. (hereafter Mochida) with support from US 12,211,582 to Pasotti et al. (hereafter Pasotti) . Regarding independent claim 2, Mochida teaches a fully integrated RRAM-Based Al Chip comprising: an array of multiple ratio-based crossbar micros (RCMs) (FIG. 1B: ReRAM array) that have two topologies, one topology for addition and a different topology for subtraction (see Abstract); inherent global input and output buffers (FIGS. 2-3: in order to receiving input x to input layer, and sending output y from output layer); and input/output interfaces (FIG. 6: comprising at least word line selection circuit 30, and determination circuit 50, not-shown ADC and DAC, see 2:65-3:15); wherein the RRAM crossbar array, buffers and interfaces are connected in a way that allows two factors in different circuit-level dimensions to be operated in parallel in the same dimension in addition/subtraction operations (see FIGS. 8A-8B and 16:42-17:46); and wherein each RCM comprises: a plurality of process elements (PE) that provide basic weight storage and a computation unit (FIG. 8B: Wi and PUi), wherein the PEs are arranged in rows M and columns N (see FIG. 1B), and wherein inference is performed in a parallel mode by activating each row (FIG. 8B: activating WLi with input xi), wherein some of the PEs are for addition and different PEs are for subtraction (FIG. 8B: e.g. RP for addition and RN for subtraction); multi-channel shared analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) wherein each ADC receives the output of a column of PEs and produces the output of the RCM (see 2:65-3:15. There requires an ADC for the output of each neuron 10 of FIG. 2. Pasotti is provided as support, and teaches multiple bit lines BL<1>P, BL<1>N … BL<m>P, BL<m> of a neuron share an ADC at the output in FIG. 5); and multiple digital-to-analog converters (DAC) that apply input signals to rows of PEs as the input to the RCM (see 2:65-3:15. There requires a DAC for each input of the neurons 10 of FIG. 2. Pasotti is provided as support, and teaches each process element comprises a DAC at an input xm in FIG. 2A). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 2, 4-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VANTHU NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1881. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:00AM - 3:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached at (571) 272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. June 23, 2026 /VANTHU T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706140
Buried Metal Techniques for Memory Applications
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700438
IN-MEMORY COMPUTATION DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING AT LEAST A MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORK
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12682978
SELF-CALIBRATION IN A MEMORY DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682964
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR HOLE CURRENT PROGRAM VERIFY OPERATIONS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675222
MEMORY SYSTEM CAPABLE OF PATROL READ
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month