Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/478,213

MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — JP 2022-204152 +1 more
Examiner
MEHTA, RATISHA
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
KIOXIA Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
569 granted / 636 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
658
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A, Sub-species 1 in the reply filed on 6/11/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 10, 14-49 and 51 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species and sub-species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/11/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7-9, 11-13 and 50 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Aikawa et al (US 2020/0302985; hereinafter Aikawa). Regarding claim 1, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses a memory device (10; Fig 3; ¶ [0042]) comprising: a memory cell (Fig 3) including: a first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]); a second conductive layer (29; Fig 3; ¶ [0051]); a third conductive layer (25; Fig 3; ¶ [0048]) provided between the first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]) and the second conductive layer (29; Fig 3; ¶ [0051]); a switching layer (24; Fig 3; ¶ [0047]) provided between the first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]) and the third conductive layer (25; Fig 3; ¶ [0048]); and a variable resistance layer (26/27/28; Fig 3; ¶ [0050]-[0051]) provided between the third conductive layer (25; Fig 3; ¶ [0048]) and the second conductive layer (29; Fig 3; ¶ [0051]); wherein the switching layer (24; Fig 3; ¶ [0047]) contains antimony (Sb) (¶ [0039]), a second element (¶ [0039]), and an oxide of a first element (¶ [0039]), the first element (¶ [0039]) is at least one element selected from a group consisting of hafnium (Hf) (¶ [0039]), and the second element is at least one element selected from a group consisting of carbon (C), boron (B), nitrogen (N), silicon (Si), and tin (Sn) (¶ [0039]). Regarding claim 7, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses the switching layer (24; Fig 3; ¶ [0047]) does not contain germanium (Fig 3); the switching layer does not contain tellurium (Te); the switching layer does not contain arsenic (As). Regarding claim 8, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses the switching layer (24; Fig 3; ¶ [0047]) does not contain germanium (Fig 3); the switching layer does not contain tellurium (Te); the switching layer does not contain arsenic (As). Regarding claim 9, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses the first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]) contains tungsten (¶ [0060]). Regarding claim 11, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses the variable resistance layer (26/27/28; Fig 3; ¶ [0050]-[0051]) includes a magnetic tunnel junction (Fig 3; ¶ [0050]-[0051]). Regarding claim 12, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses an electrical resistance of the variable resistance layer changes with application of a predetermined voltage, and the switching layer has a nonlinear current-voltage characteristic, and a current increases at a specific threshold voltage in the nonlinear current-voltage characteristic. (¶ [0038]) Regarding claim 13, Fig 2 of Aikawa discloses a plurality of first wirings (BL; Fig 2); and a plurality of second wirings (WL; Fig 2) crossing the plurality of first wirings, wherein the memory cell is (Fig 2) provided in a region where one of the plurality of first wirings and one of the plurality of second wirings cross each other (Fig 2). Regarding claim 20, Fig 3 of Aikawa discloses a memory device (10; Fig 3; ¶ [0042]) comprising: a memory cell (Fig 3) including: a first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]); a second conductive layer (29; Fig 3; ¶ [0051]); a third conductive layer (25; Fig 3; ¶ [0048]) provided between the first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]) and the second conductive layer (29; Fig 3; ¶ [0051]); a switching layer (24; Fig 3; ¶ [0047]) provided between the first conductive layer (21; Fig 3; ¶ [0043]) and the third conductive layer (25; Fig 3; ¶ [0048]); and a variable resistance layer (26/27/28; Fig 3; ¶ [0050]-[0051]) provided between the third conductive layer (25; Fig 3; ¶ [0048]) and the second conductive layer (29; Fig 3; ¶ [0051]); wherein the switching layer (24; Fig 3; ¶ [0047]) contains antimony (Sb) (¶ [0039]), a second element (¶ [0039]), and an oxide of a first element (¶ [0039]), the first element (¶ [0039]) is at least one element selected from a group consisting of hafnium (Hf) (¶ [0039]), and the second element is at least one element selected from a group consisting of carbon (C), boron (B), nitrogen (N), silicon (Si), and tin (Sn) (¶ [0039]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aikawa et al (US 2020/; hereinafter Aikawa) in view of Vaziri et al (US 2023/0240081; hereinafter Vaziri). Regarding claim 2, Aikawa does not expressly disclose a sum of an atomic concentration of the first element contained in the switching layer and an atomic concentration of oxygen (O) contained in the switching layer is equal to or more than 20 atomic % to or less than 95 atomic %. In the same field of endeavor, Vaziri discloses atomic percentages of the elements and oxygen contained in a switching layer is in a range from 40% to 70% (¶ [0018]). Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such that a sum of an atomic concentration of the first element contained in the switching layer and an atomic concentration of oxygen (O) contained in the switching layer is within the claimed range for the purpose of forming a highly non-linear switching material that is, when applying voltage or passing current, at some point the electrical resistance of the material abruptly non-linearly drops for increasing voltage/current, and when the voltage or current is removed (for volatile switches) the resistance goes back to the high resistance state. (¶ [0018]). Regarding claim 3, Aikawa does not expressly disclose an atomic concentration of antimony (Sb) contained in the switching layer is equal to or more than 1 atomic %. In the same field of endeavor, Vaziri discloses an atomic concentration of Sb is a range of 10% to 40% (¶ [0018]). Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such that an atomic concentration of antimony (Sb) contained in the switching layer is equal to or more than 1 atomic % in order to include a chalcogenide material in the switching material as it helps in forming a highly non-linear switching material that is, when applying voltage or passing current, at some point the electrical resistance of the material abruptly non-linearly drops for increasing voltage/current, and when the voltage or current is removed (for volatile switches) the resistance goes back to the high resistance state. (¶ [0018]). Claim(s) 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aikawa et al (US 2020/0302985; hereinafter Aikawa). Regarding claim 4, Aikawa discloses the second element such as Boron or carbon or silicon (¶ [0018]) is included in the switching material. Therefore atomic % will be at least equal to 1 atomic % or more. (¶ [0039]) However, the ordinary artisan would have recognized the atomic % of second element to be a result effective variable affecting the switching material which in turn electrical resistance of the material. Thus, it would have been obvious to vary the atomic % within the claimed range, since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. see MPEP 2144.05 II.B Regarding claim 5, Aikawa discloses the second element such as Boron or carbon or silicon (¶ [0018]) is included in the switching material. Therefore atomic % will be at least equal to 1 atomic % or more (¶ [0039]) and also the switching material comprises antimony (Sb). However Aikawa does not expressly disclose a ratio of an atomic concentration of antimony (Sb) to an atomic concentration of the second element in the switching layer is equal to or more than 1/3 and less than 3. However, the ordinary artisan would have recognized the atomic % of second element and atomic % of antimony to be a result effective variable affecting the switching material which in turn electrical resistance of the material. Thus, it would have been obvious to vary the atomic % within the claimed range, since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. see MPEP 2144.05 II.B Regarding claim 6, Aikawa discloses the second element such as Boron or carbon or silicon (¶ [0018]) is included in the switching material. Therefore atomic % will be at least equal to 1 atomic % or more (¶ [0039]) and also the switching material comprises antimony (Sb). However Aikawa does not expressly disclose a ratio of an atomic concentration of antimony (Sb) to an atomic concentration of the second element in the switching layer is equal to or more than 0.8 and equal to or less than 2. However, the ordinary artisan would have recognized the atomic % of second element and atomic % of antimony to be a result effective variable affecting the switching material which in turn electrical resistance of the material. Thus, it would have been obvious to vary the atomic % within the claimed range, since optimum or workable ranges of such variables are discoverable through routine experimentation. see MPEP 2144.05 II.B Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Furuhashi (US 2020/0303454) Karpov et al (US 2020/0235163) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RATISHA MEHTA whose telephone number is (571)270-7473. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 9:00am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos Feliciano can be reached at 571-272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RATISHA MEHTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685154
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684897
DISPLAY DEVICE, SUBSTRATE FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REPAIRING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672543
Integrated Circuit Packages and Methods of Forming the Same
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12642136
DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641919
MASS TRANSFER SYSTEM, ATTACHING DEVICE, AND MASS TRANSFER METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.7%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month