Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/478,674

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING LANGUAGE LEARNING SERVICES

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Priority
Oct 07, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0128685
Examiner
FRENCH, CORRELL T
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
NAVER Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
60 granted / 130 resolved
-23.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
166
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 130 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed January 12, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 5-12, 14-15, and 19-26 remain pending in the application. Claims 1, 15, and 19-23 are noted as amended and claims 24-26 are noted as newly added. Applicant’s amendments to the claims have overcome all previous objections and the 112(a) rejections in the Non-Final Office Action mailed September 10, 2025 and all objections and 112(a) rejections therein have been withdrawn. However, new objections are noted below. Claim Objections Claims 1, 15, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 24, “in text recognized” should read “in the text recognized”. In claim 1, line 28, “the translation of sentence” should read “the translation of the sentence”. In claim 1, line 34, “to a request for learning” should read “to the request for learning”. In claim 1, line 57, “a recommended learning word” should read “the recommended learning word”. In claim 15, line 24, “in text recognized” should read “in the text recognized”. In claim 15, line 25, “sentence, , wherein” should read “sentence, wherein”. In claim 15, line 28, “translation of sentence” should read “translation of the sentence”. In claim 15, line 34, “to a request for learning” should read “to the request for learning”. In claim 15, line 57, “a recommended learning word” should read “the recommended learning word”. In claim 20, line 25, “sentence, , wherein” should read “sentence, wherein”. In claim 20, line 29, “translation of sentence” should read “translation of the sentence”. In claim 20, line 34, “to a request for learning” should read “to the request for learning”. In claim 20, line 57, “a recommended learning word” should read “the recommended learning word”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the user terminal" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the word recognized" in line 56. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the word recognized" in line 56. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 20 recites the limitation "the user terminal" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 20 recites the limitation "the word recognized" in line 56. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 5-12, 14, 19, and 21-26 are rejected by virtue of their dependency from the rejected independent claims. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 9 recites the same limitation as claim 1, lines 56-59 and therefore fails to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 5-7, 9-11, 15, and 20-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (US PGPub 20100008582), hereinafter referred to as Kim, in view of Solntseva et al. (US PGPub 20140081619), hereinafter referred to as Solntseva, further in view of Cho et al. (US PGPub 20140170630), hereinafter referred to as Cho, further in view of Cha (US PGPub 20120179455), further in view of Nielson et al. (US PGPub 20170256179), hereinafter referred to as Nielson, and further in view of Holt et al. (US 8,699,941), hereinafter referred to as Holt. With regard to claims 1 and 15, Kim teaches a method of providing language learning services [claim 1] (Abstract; Paragraph 0039) and a system for providing language learning services (Abstract; Paragraph 0050; “apparatus”) in conjunction with a user terminal including a display [claim 15] (Paragraphs 0050-0052; “apparatus including a touch-screen”), comprising: a control unit (Paragraphs 0072-0073; “CPU”), wherein the control unit [claim 15]: displaying, through a user terminal (Paragraphs 0050-0052; “apparatus including a touch-screen”), a service page including a translation interface configured to provide a translation result for input text (Paragraphs 0043-0044, 0050-0051 teach the system can provide translations of captured/inputted text displayed on the user apparatus); and acquiring, in response to receiving an input for acquiring a learning target image (Paragraphs 0008, 0041-0042 teach the system can photograph an image), the learning target image from the camera (Paragraphs 0008, 0041; “photographing an image”); wherein the acquiring of the learning of the learning target image further comprises specifying at least a portion of an image taken by the camera as the learning target image based on a user input (Paragraphs 0051-0054, 0057 teach the user can select an area/partial range of the photographed image as the area to be character-recognized and translated); wherein the acquiring of the learning target image through the user terminal (Paragraphs 0008, 0041; “photographing an image”) comprises: receiving language learning information for the learning target image from a database (Abstract; Paragraphs 0044, 0060, 0081 teach the system can search recognized words in the electronic dictionary database including definition and translation information), wherein text included in the learning target image is recognized using an optical character recognition (OCR) process and information related to the recognized text is transmitted to the database (Paragraphs 0006, 0041, 0044, 0084, 0086, 0088 teach the system uses optical character recognition to generate a searchable character string, searches a database for a corresponding word (transmits the recognized characters to the database, and presents the translated word); wherein the language learning information received includes text information extracted from the learning target image using the OCR process (Paragraphs 0006, 0041, 0044, 0084, 0086, 0088 teach the system uses OCR to recognize characters in the image/target area, constructs a word from the recognized characters (text information) including numbers and punctuation, and searches a dictionary for word information including a meaning of the word); providing the language learning information to the user terminal (Paragraphs 0042, 0051, 0078 teach the system can provide the translation and definition to the user through the user interface); and storing, based on a request for storing of the language learning information, the language learning information in association with the learning target image (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the dictionary data such as definition), such that the learning target image is used in conjunction with learning of the language learning information (Paragraphs 0079-0080 teach the photographed image and the recognized and translated characters can be stored and displayed (used in conjunction)), and wherein the language learning information comprises a translation of a sentence included in text recognized via the OCR process from the learning target image (Paragraphs 0039, 0041, 0071, 0079 teach the system can provide the resulting translation of characters including the entire image and sentences), and meaning information of a word included in the sentence (Paragraphs 0044, 0068, 0081 teach the system can retrieve meaning/definition information of a word from the database and provide the meaning to the user), wherein the translation of the sentence and the meaning information of the word included in the sentence have been generated by the database (Paragraphs 0039, 0041, 0044, 0084, 0086, 0088 teach the system creates the translation and meaning by searching a dictionary database); the method further comprising: displaying, through the translation interface, the translation of the sentence included in the recognized text (Paragraphs 0043-0044, 0050-0052, 0079 teach the system can provide translations of captured/inputted text displayed on the user apparatus which can include a full text/sentence as seen in figures 6B, 13C, and 15A); displaying, in response to the request for learning for learning (Paragraphs 0008, 0057, 0060 teaches a user can select an area/characters to be translated (request)), the language learning information stored with the learning target image, such that the language learning information is used for learning (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores and provides the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the dictionary data such as definition/meaning), wherein such that the language learning information is managed as the learning page with the learning target image (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores and provides the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the dictionary data such as definition/meaning); and wherein the word recognized from the learning target image comprises at least one of a selected learning word selected through a user's input to one or more words included in the sentence (Paragraphs 0039, 0042, 0064 teach the user can select characters or words to translate). Kim may not explicitly teach the control unit displaying an icon configured to activate a camera of the user terminal; acquiring a learning target image by activating the camera via the icon on the service page; configured to receive language learning information from a server through a communication unit, and generating the information and translation by the server. However, Solntseva teaches a method and system for recognition and translation of text in photographs wherein the software can include accessing and performing functionality on one or more servers communicated with via a network wherein the user interface includes a camera button for capturing an image with the camera of the user device (Abstract; Paragraphs 0020, 0022, 0024-0025). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim to incorporate the teachings of Solntseva by operating the software on one or more servers and including a camera button on the user interface as taught by Solntseva such that the electronic database of Kim is hosted on a server that the electronic device communicates with, as both references and the claimed invention are directed to methods and systems for translating text in a photograph/image. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim by hosting the electronic database on a server connected to the electronic device via a network for the device to communicate with such that the translation and other character information are retrieved from the server and including a camera button for “activating” the camera of the user apparatus to capture the image. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim would include displaying an icon configured to activate a camera of the user terminal; acquiring a learning target image by activating the camera via the icon on the service page; configured to receive language learning information from a server through a communication unit, and generating the information and translations by the server. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Solntseva with Kim’s system and method in order to improve system performance by increasing processing power and resources (Solntseva paragraph 0004). Kim in view of Solntseva may not explicitly teach wherein the storing of the language learning information in association with the learning target image further comprises storing the language learning information in a learning note including the learning page, such that the language learning information is managed as the learning page with the learning target image. However, Cho teaches a system and method of providing learning contents by a server in which content is sorted by subject such that when a user selects a subject the server provides the content related to that subject (Paragraphs 0093-0094) wherein the subject is equivalent to the learning note of the instant application. It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva to incorporate the teachings of Cho by sorting the photographed images and translation results of Kim into subjects as taught by Cho as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be sorted as taught by Cho. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva by storing the photographed images and associated translation results into folders/subjects. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva would include wherein the storing of the language learning information in association with the learning target image further comprises storing the language learning information in a learning note including the learning page, such that the language learning information is managed as the learning page with the learning target image. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cho with Kim in view of Solntseva’s system and method in order to organize stored photograph images and translations in order to improve user interaction and usage. Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho may not explicitly teach wherein the providing of the language learning information to the user terminal comprises: displaying, on the user terminal, a question item; receiving, through the user terminal, a response to the question item; determining a learning level of the user among a plurality of pre-classified learning levels based on the received response; extracting, based on the learning level of the user, a recommended learning word from the sentence recognized from the learning target image; and providing, to the user terminal, the recommended learning word and meaning information of the recommended learning word using the language learning information, wherein the learning level of the user is changeable based on an input to the user terminal. However, Cha teaches a system and method for language learning by constructing an individual person-based word DB based on a user’s learning level as determined by providing a test (question items) to the user, receiving user answers/responses, and calculating the user’s learning level based on performance and then extracting words from learning content based on the user’s learning level and providing the words and definitions based on the user’s learning level wherein the learning level can also be set by an input from the user (Abstract; Paragraphs 0011, 0076, 0079, 0082-0083, 0094, 0127). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho to incorporate the teachings of Cha by providing users with a test to determine a user’s skill/learning level as taught by Cha to provide relevant words and definitions from Kim as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Cha in order to provide user’s words appropriate for their learning/skill level. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho by coding the system to provide test/check-ups that present questions and receives answers from the user in order to determine the user’s skill/learning level and then extract and present words corresponding to the user’s learning level. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho would include wherein the providing of the language learning information to the user terminal comprises: displaying, on the user terminal, a question item; receiving, through the user terminal, a response to the question item; determining a learning level of the user among a plurality of pre-classified learning levels based on the received response; extracting, based on the learning level of the user, a recommended learning word from the sentence recognized from the learning target image; and providing, to the user terminal, the recommended learning word and meaning information of the recommended learning word using the language learning information, wherein the learning level of the user is changeable based on an input to the user terminal. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cha with Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho’s system and method in order to provide users with appropriate words and definitions based on their skill level in order to improve user comprehension and understanding. Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha may not explicitly teach wherein the learning note is a data structure configured to associate the learning target image, the recognized text, the language learning information, and a learning state for use in subsequent learning. However, Nielson teaches a system and method for language learning via extracting text using NLP features wherein learning content can be stored in a data store/database as a resource store wherein resources may be stored as a combination of text, image, and metadata including information describing the text and content of the resource (Paragraphs 0057, 0060-0063). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha to incorporate the teachings of Nielson by storing learning data/resources as a resource in a database including metadata as taught by Nielson to store the images and translations from Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Nielson in order to better store and manage the processed images and content. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha by coding the system to store the images and translations as resources as a combination/association of the image, translated text, definition and other learning information, and metadata which can include the learning progress of Cho. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho would include wherein the learning note is a data structure configured to associate the learning target image, the recognized text, the language learning information, and a learning state for use in subsequent learning. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Nielson with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha’s system and method in order to better manage the system data, improve system organization, and as such a choice to store data as a record/resource in a database would be an obvious design/engineering choice to one of ordinary skill in the art in order to improve the system in the same way by managing content data for ease of use, storing, and retrieval. Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson may not explicitly teach in response to a user interaction with the translation interface indicating a request for learning based on the displayed translation, generating a learning page that is separate and distinct from the service page. However, it is noted that Solntseva teaches displaying pop-up window (Paragraph 0062), and Holt teaches a system and method for learning using a learning map interface wherein a user can select a symbol to request additional details and/or resources related to the displayed content wherein the selection results in the system displaying a new web page containing the details and/or materials (Col 11, lines 12-23; Col 13, lines 49-59). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson to incorporate the teachings of Holt by including links/functionality to request additional details and/or resources related to the content as taught by Holt for the images and translations of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Holt in order to further user learning and comprehension. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson by coding the system to include a note symbol or link to request additional details and/or materials for the recognized text and image such as definitions or the learning resource of Nielson wherein the selection can result in the display of a new web page (separate and distinct from the image capturing/translation interface screen) which would display the associated learning information and content of the resource and can include additional materials to further user learning and comprehension. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson would include in response to a user interaction with the translation interface indicating a request for learning based on the displayed translation, generating a learning page that is separate and distinct from the service page. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Holt with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson’s system and method in order to further user learning and comprehension by providing additional resources and presenting the information in a user friendly way as a new page to avoid overcrowding the display. With regard to claim 5, Kim in view of Solntseva may not explicitly teach wherein the learning page further comprises information indicating a learning progress rate for the learning page, and wherein the learning progress rate comprises a learning progress state using the language learning information stored with the learning target image on the learning page. However, Cho further teaches the system includes progress rates/bars for the learning content including icons (progress state) based on the performance (Figs. 4b, 6A; Paragraphs 0095, 0104, 0113). As discussed above, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva to incorporate the teachings of Cho by sorting the photographed images and translation results of Kim into subjects as taught by Cho as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be sorted as taught by Cho. One of ordinary skill in the art would further modify Kim in view of Solntseva by including progress rates and icons to show user progress in the learning content. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva would include wherein the learning page further comprises information indicating a learning progress rate for the learning page, and wherein the learning progress rate comprises a learning progress state using the language learning information stored with the learning target image on the learning page. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cho with Kim in view of Solntseva’s system and method in order to improve user interaction and usage by presenting user progress. With regard to claim 6, Kim in view of Solntseva may not explicitly teach further comprising: displaying, through the user terminal, a plurality of graphic objects corresponding to a plurality of learning notes; displaying, in response to a selection of one of the plurality of graphic objects, at least one learning page included in the learning note corresponding to the selected graphic object; and displaying, in response to a request for learning for the at least one learning page, language learning information included in the at least one learning page. However, Cho further teaches the system displays, via the learner terminal, the list of subjects (graphic objects) registered to the learner including progress rates for each subject (note) based on the user login and inputs and displaying the corresponding content (pages) upon selection of a subject (Figs. 4A, 6A; Paragraphs 0093-0094, 0104). As discussed above, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva to incorporate the teachings of Cho by sorting the photographed images and translation results of Kim into subjects as taught by Cho as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be sorted as taught by Cho. One of ordinary skill in the art would further modify Kim in view of Solntseva by coding the system to display the list of subjects as selectable objects on the user interface and presenting the corresponding pages including the images and translations of Kim upon selection of the corresponding subject. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva would include further comprising: displaying, through the user terminal, a plurality of graphic objects corresponding to a plurality of learning notes; displaying, in response to a selection of one of the plurality of graphic objects, at least one learning page included in the learning note corresponding to the selected graphic object; and displaying, in response to a request for learning for the at least one learning page, language learning information included in the at least one learning page. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cho with Kim in view of Solntseva’s system and method in order to organize stored photograph images and translations in order to improve user interaction and usage. With regard to claim 7, Kim in view of Solntseva may not explicitly teach wherein the plurality of graphic objects comprises information indicating note learning progress rates for the plurality of learning notes, and wherein the note learning progress rate comprises a learning progress state using language learning information stored in a learning page included in each of the plurality of learning notes. However, Cho further teaches the system displays, via the learner terminal, the list of subjects (graphic objects) registered to the learner including progress rates and wrong answer rates (state) for each subject (note) based on the user login and inputs and displaying the corresponding content (pages) upon selection of a subject (Figs. 4A, 6A; Paragraphs 0093-0094, 0104). As discussed above, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva to incorporate the teachings of Cho by sorting the photographed images and translation results of Kim into subjects as taught by Cho as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be sorted as taught by Cho. One of ordinary skill in the art would further modify Kim in view of Solntseva by coding the system to display the list of subjects as selectable objects on the user interface and presenting the corresponding progress rates for the subjects. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva would include wherein the plurality of graphic objects comprises information indicating note learning progress rates for the plurality of learning notes, and wherein the note learning progress rate comprises a learning progress state using language learning information stored in a learning page included in each of the plurality of learning notes. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cho with Kim in view of Solntseva’s system and method in order to organize stored photograph images and translations in order to improve user interaction and usage. With regard to claim 9, Kim further teaches wherein the word recognized from the learning target image comprises at least one of a selected learning word selected through a user's input to one or more words included in the sentence (Paragraphs 0039, 0042, 0064 teach the user can select characters or words to translate). With regard to claim 10, Kim further teaches further comprising: displaying meaning information for a specific word selected by the user's input among words included in the learning target image (Paragraphs 0044, 0068, 0081 teach the system can retrieve meaning/definition information of a word from the database wherein the word can be selected by the user and provide the meaning to the user); and storing the specific word as the selected learning word (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the selected words/characters). With regard to claim 11, Kim further teaches wherein the method further comprises: highlighting, in response to a user's input being applied in a preset manner for a specific portion of the sentence through the user terminal, a phrase corresponding to the specific portion to be distinct from other portions (Paragraph 0064 teaches the user can highlight a word or character string making the characters distinct from the other neighboring words or character strings); and storing the phrase corresponding to the specific portion as the phrase learning information (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the selected words/characters). Kim may not explicitly teach wherein the language learning information further comprises phrase learning information. However, Solntseva further teaches the user can select an area or words and the selected words are analyzed within the context of some or the entire text including words near the selected words such that the combination of words (phrase) is analyzed to determine the meaning and context of the words for translation purposes (Paragraphs 0032-0033, 0068). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim to incorporate the teachings of Solntseva by analyzing the word combinations in order to understand context and better translate the selected words/phrases, as both references and the claimed invention are directed to methods and systems for translating text in a photograph/image. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim by allowing users to select words/word combinations and analyze the surrounding words/character strings including the context of the words and phrases. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim would include wherein the language learning information further comprises phrase learning information. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Solntseva with Kim’s system and method in order to better translate words and characters by including the context and phrases of the word. With regard to claim 20, Kim teaches one or more processes on an electronic device, the program comprising instructions for performing: displaying, through a user terminal (Paragraphs 0050-0052; “apparatus including a touch-screen”), a service page including a translation interface configured to provide a translation result for input text (Paragraphs 0043-0044, 0050-0051 teach the system can provide translations of captured/inputted text displayed on the user apparatus); acquiring, in response to receiving an input for acquiring a learning target image (Paragraphs 0008, 0041-0042 teach the system can photograph an image), the learning target image from the camera (Paragraphs 0008, 0041; “photographing an image”); wherein the acquiring of the learning of the learning target image further comprises specifying at least a portion of an image taken by the camera as the learning target image based on a user input (Paragraphs 0051-0054, 0057 teach the user can select an area/partial range of the photographed image as the area to be character-recognized and translated); wherein the acquiring of the learning target image through the user terminal (Paragraphs 0008, 0041; “photographing an image”) comprises: receiving language learning information for the learning target image from a database (Abstract; Paragraphs 0044, 0060, 0081 teach the system can search recognized words in the electronic dictionary database including definition and translation information), wherein text included in the learning target image is recognized using an optical character recognition (OCR) process and information related to the recognized text is transmitted to the database (Paragraphs 0006, 0041, 0044, 0084, 0086, 0088 teach the system uses optical character recognition to generate a searchable character string, searches a database for a corresponding word (transmits the recognized characters to the database, and presents the translated word); wherein the language learning information received includes text information extracted from the learning target image using the OCR process (Paragraphs 0006, 0041, 0044, 0084, 0086, 0088 teach the system uses OCR to recognize characters in the image/target area, constructs a word from the recognized characters (text information) including numbers and punctuation, and searches a dictionary for word information including a meaning of the word); providing the language learning information to the user terminal (Paragraphs 0042, 0051, 0078 teach the system can provide the translation and definition to the user through the user interface); and storing the language learning information in association with the learning target image, based on a request for storing the language learning information (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the dictionary data such as definition), such that the learning target image is used in conjunction with learning of the language learning information (Paragraphs 0079-0080 teach the photographed image and the recognized and translated characters can be stored and displayed (used in conjunction)), wherein the language learning information comprises a translation of at least one sentence corresponding to the text recognized via the OCR process from the learning target image (Paragraphs 0039, 0041, 0071, 0079 teach the system can provide the resulting translation of characters including the entire image and sentences), and meaning information about at least one word included in the at least one sentence (Paragraphs 0044, 0068, 0081 teach the system can retrieve meaning/definition information of a word from the database and provide the meaning to the user), wherein the translation of the sentence and the meaning information of the word included in the sentence have been generated by the database (Paragraphs 0039, 0041, 0044, 0084, 0086, 0088 teach the system creates the translation and meaning by searching a dictionary database); the method further comprising: displaying, through the translation interface, the translation of the sentence included in the recognized text (Paragraphs 0043-0044, 0050-0052, 0079 teach the system can provide translations of captured/inputted text displayed on the user apparatus which can include a full text/sentence as seen in figures 6B, 13C, and 15A); displaying, in response to a request for learning for the learning page (Paragraphs 0008, 0057, 0060 teaches a user can select an area/characters to be translated (request)), the language learning information stored with the learning target image, such that the language learning information is used for learning (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores and provides the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the dictionary data such as definition/meaning), wherein such that the language learning information is managed as the learning page with the learning target image (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores and provides the captured images and the recognized characters and translation result including the dictionary data such as definition/meaning); and wherein the word recognized from the learning target image comprises at least one of a selected learning word selected through a user's input to one or more words included in the sentence (Paragraphs 0039, 0042, 0064 teach the user can select characters or words to translate). Kim may not explicitly teach a program stored on a computer-readable recording medium, which is executed by one or more processes on an electronic device; displaying an icon configured to activate a camera of the user terminal; acquiring a learning target image by activating the camera via the icon on the service page; receiving the language learning information from a server; and generating the information and translation by the server. However, Solntseva teaches a method and system for recognition and translation of text in photographs wherein the software (program stored on the device) can include accessing and performing functionality on one or more servers communicated with via a network wherein the user interface includes a camera button for capturing an image with the camera of the user device (Abstract; Paragraphs 0020, 0022, 0023-0025, 0078). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim to incorporate the teachings of Solntseva by operating the software on one or more servers as taught by Solntseva such that the electronic database of Kim is hosted on a server that the electronic device communicates with wherein the electronic device includes the software/program instructions to perform the processes, as both references and the claimed invention are directed to methods and systems for translating text in a photograph/image. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim by hosting the electronic database on a server connected to the electronic device via a network for the device to communicate with such that the translation and other character information are retrieved from the server. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim would include a program stored on a computer-readable recording medium, which is executed by one or more processes on an electronic device; displaying an icon configured to activate a camera of the user terminal; acquiring a learning target image by activating the camera via the icon on the service page; receiving the language learning information from a server; and generating the information and translation by the server. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Solntseva with Kim’s system and method in order to improve system performance by increasing processing power and resources (Solntseva paragraph 0004). Kim in view of Solntseva may not explicitly teach wherein the storing of the language learning information in association with the learning target image further comprises storing the language learning information in a learning note including the learning page. However, Cho teaches a system and method of providing learning contents by a server in which content is sorted by subject such that when a user selects a subject the server provides the content related to that subject (Paragraphs 0093-0094) wherein the subject is equivalent to the learning note of the instant application. It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva to incorporate the teachings of Cho by sorting the photographed images and translation results of Kim into subjects as taught by Cho as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be sorted as taught by Cho. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva by storing the photographed images and associated translation results into folders/subjects. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva would include wherein the storing of the language learning information in association with the learning target image further comprises storing the language learning information in a learning note including the learning page. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cho with Kim in view of Solntseva’s system and method in order to organize stored photograph images and translations in order to improve user interaction and usage. Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho may not explicitly teach wherein the providing of the language learning information to the user terminal comprises: displaying, on the user terminal, a question item; receiving, through the user terminal, a response to the question item; determining a learning level of the user among a plurality of pre-classified learning levels based on the received response and according to a predetermined criterion; extracting, based on the learning level of the user, a recommended learning word from a sentence recognized from the learning target image; and providing, to the user terminal, the recommended learning word and meaning information of the recommended learning word using the language learning information, wherein the learning level of the user is changeable based on an input to the user terminal. However, Cha teaches a system and method for language learning by constructing an individual person-based word DB based on a user’s learning level as determined by providing a test (question items) to the user, receiving user answers/responses, and calculating the user’s learning level based on performance and then extracting words from learning content based on the user’s learning level and providing the words and definitions based on the user’s learning level wherein the learning level can also be set by an input from the user (Abstract; Paragraphs 0011, 0076, 0079, 0082-0083, 0094, 0127). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho to incorporate the teachings of Cha by providing users with a test to determine a user’s skill/learning level as taught by Cha to provide relevant words and definitions from Kim as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Cha in order to provide user’s words appropriate for their learning/skill level. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho by coding the system to provide test/check-ups that present questions and receives answers from the user in order to determine the user’s skill/learning level and then extract and present words corresponding to the user’s learning level. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho would include wherein the providing of the language learning information to the user terminal comprises: displaying, on the user terminal, a question item; receiving, through the user terminal, a response to the question item; determining a learning level of the user among a plurality of pre-classified learning levels based on the received response and according to a predetermined criterion; extracting, based on the learning level of the user, a recommended learning word from a sentence recognized from the learning target image; and providing, to the user terminal, the recommended learning word and meaning information of the recommended learning word using the language learning information, wherein the learning level of the user is changeable based on an input to the user terminal. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cha with Kim in view of Solntseva and Cha’s system and method in order to provide users with appropriate words and definitions based on their skill level in order to improve user comprehension and understanding. Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha may not explicitly teach wherein the learning note is a data structure configured to associate the learning target image, the recognized text, the language learning information, and a learning state for use in subsequent learning. However, Nielson teaches a system and method for language learning via extracting text using NLP features wherein learning content can be stored in a data store/database as a resource store wherein resources may be stored as a combination of text, image, and metadata including information describing the text and content of the resource (Paragraphs 0057, 0060-0063). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha to incorporate the teachings of Nielson by storing learning data/resources as a resource in a database including metadata as taught by Nielson to store the images and translations from Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Nielson in order to better store and manage the processed images and content. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha by coding the system to store the images and translations as resources as a combination/association of the image, translated text, definition and other learning information, and metadata which can include the learning progress of Cho. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho would include wherein the learning note is a data structure configured to associate the learning target image, the recognized text, the language learning information, and a learning state for use in subsequent learning. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Nielson with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha’s system and method in order to better manage the system data, improve system organization, and as such a choice to store data as a record/resource in a database would be an obvious design/engineering choice to one of ordinary skill in the art in order to improve the system in the same way by managing content data for ease of use, storing, and retrieval. Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson may not explicitly teach in response to a user interaction with the translation interface indicating a request for learning based on the displayed translation, generating a learning page that is separate and distinct from the service page. However, it is noted that Solntseva teaches displaying pop-up window (Paragraph 0062), and Holt teaches a system and method for learning using a learning map interface wherein a user can select a symbol to request additional details and/or resources related to the displayed content wherein the selection results in the system displaying a new web page containing the details and/or materials (Col 11, lines 12-23; Col 13, lines 49-59). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson to incorporate the teachings of Holt by including links/functionality to request additional details and/or resources related to the content as taught by Holt for the images and translations of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Holt in order to further user learning and comprehension. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson by coding the system to include a note symbol or link to request additional details and/or materials for the recognized text and image such as definitions or the learning resource of Nielson wherein the selection can result in the display of a new web page (separate and distinct from the image capturing/translation interface screen) which would display the associated learning information and content of the resource and can include additional materials to further user learning and comprehension. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson would include in response to a user interaction with the translation interface indicating a request for learning based on the displayed translation, generating a learning page that is separate and distinct from the service page. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Holt with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson’s system and method in order to further user learning and comprehension by providing additional resources and presenting the information in a user friendly way as a new page to avoid overcrowding the display. With regard to claims 21-23, Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho may not explicitly teach classifying the word into a first state or a second state, based on an input from the user terminal, wherein the first state is a memorized state and the second state is a non-memorized state. However, Cha further teaches classifying words into known (first state/memorized) and unknown (second state/unknown) including based on a user input/selection (Paragraphs 0075, 0080). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho to incorporate the teachings of Cha by allowing users to classify words as known or unknown as taught by Cha to provide relevant words and definitions from Kim as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Cha in order to organize words based on the user’s skill and whether they known/do not know the words. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho by coding the system to allow the user to classify the words into known words and unknown words. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva and Cho would include classifying the word into a first state or a second state, based on an input from the user terminal, wherein the first state is a memorized state and the second state is a non-memorized state. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Cha with Kim in view of Solntseva and Cha’s system and method in order to provide users with appropriate words and definitions based on their skill level in order to improve user comprehension and understanding. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Park et al. (US PGPub 20220406216), hereinafter referred to as Park. With regard to claim 8, Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt may not explicitly teach further comprising: displaying, based on a request for learning for the learning page, a card including the word and meaning information of the word; and determining, based on a direction of a drag input to the card, a user's learning state for the word included in the card; and classifying, based on the determination of the learning state, the word as either a first state or a second state, where the second state is distinct from the first state. However, Park teaches a method and system for improving vocabulary skills of foreign language learners including presenting recommended words wherein the user can drag the presented word “windows” (card) to the left or right based on the users desire to add the words to a vocabulary list or not include the word (states) (Figs. 7 and 8; Paragraphs 0090-0092, 0104). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt to incorporate the teachings of Park by presenting the translation results of Kim as windows and to create a vocabulary list for a user to learn as taught by Park as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be displayed as taught by Park. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva by presenting the photographed images and associated translation results into folders/subjects in the form of words that a user can select to add to a vocabulary list for practice/learning by dragging the windows left or right as taught by Park. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt would include further comprising: displaying, based on a request for learning for the learning page, a card including the word and meaning information of the word; and determining, based on a direction of a drag input to the card, a user's learning state for the word included in the card; and classifying, based on the determination of the learning state, the word as either a first state or a second state, where the second state is distinct from the first state. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Park with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt’s system and method in order for users to further practice and learn the foreign language and words. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nomi et al. (US PGPub 20150310270), hereinafter referred to as Nomi. With regard to claim 12, Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt may not explicitly teach further comprising: displaying, in response to a request for editing for the text recognized from the learning target image, an editing interface configured to allow editing of the text by including a virtual keyboard. However, Solntseva does teach the system can present variants of translation of a word and replace the word with a selected variant thereby editing the text (Paragraphs 0062-0063). Further, Nomi teaches a system and method for optical reading using OCR wherein the system presents a virtual keyboard to a user to edit the text data displayed in order to correct an error in the text (Paragraphs 0005, 0088, 0104, 0106). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt to incorporate the teachings of Nomi by allowing users to edit the recognized text using a virtual keyboard as taught by Nomi, as the references and the claimed invention are directed to methods and systems for recognizing text in a photograph/image. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt by presenting a virtual keyboard to allow users to edit the displayed text. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt would include further comprising: displaying, in response to a request for editing for the text recognized from the learning target image, an editing interface configured to allow editing of the text by including a virtual keyboard. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Nomi with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt’s system and method in order to allow users to correct errors and edit the recognized text. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yang et al. (US PGPub 20080033712), hereinafter referred to as Yang. With regard to claim 14, Kim further teaches storing meaning information of a word included in the translation result provided through the translation interface as the language learning information stored in association with the learning target image (Paragraphs 0045, 0060, 0062, 0079 teach the system stores the captured images and the recognized characters and translation results wherein the result can include the recognized or inputted text as discussed below) but Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt may not explicitly teach displaying a translation interface configured to receive text input and to provide a translation result for the text input through the user terminal. However, Yang teaches a system and method of learning a second language including a pictures and text wherein the system allows a user to input text that will be displayed (Abstract; Paragraphs 0008, 0013-0015, 0040, 0052). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt to incorporate the teachings of Yang by allowing a user to input text via a user interface and translate the inputted text as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby be displayed as taught by Yang. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt by coding the system to include a text input interface for a user to input text to be translated in regards to the captured/photographed image wherein the inputted and translated text can be stored with the image as taught by Kim. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt would include displaying a translation interface configured to receive text input and to provide a translation result for the text input through the user terminal. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Yang with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt’s system and method in order for users to manually input text to be translated. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt as applied to claim 15 above, and further in view of Landwehr (US PGPub 20150024351). With regard to claim 19, Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt may not explicitly teach further comprising: a storage unit including a word ID corresponding to the word, wherein the control unit transmits, through the communication unit, the word ID stored in the storage unit to the server to receive meaning information on the word corresponding to the transmitted word ID from the server. However, Landwehr teaches a system and method for learning words wherein the words can be tagged with an ID (word ID) that associates the word with data in the databased (storage unit) including meanings of the word (Paragraphs 0060, 0076, 0111-0112, 0127). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt to incorporate the teachings of Landwehr by storing the words in a database including tag IDs for the words to associate the data with the words as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby include storing the words/translations as taught by Landwehr. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt by coding the system to include storing the words in the electronic dictionary/database of Kim with tags/IDs associated with the words including the meanings of the words. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt would include further comprising: a storage unit including a word ID corresponding to the word, wherein the control unit transmits, through the communication unit, the word ID stored in the storage unit to the server to receive meaning information on the word corresponding to the transmitted word ID from the server. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Landwehr with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt’s system and method in order to better store the words in the database and improve searching and accessing the database/dictionary including adding personalized meaning as taught by Landwehr. Claim(s) 24-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt as applied to claims 1, 15, and 20 above, and further in view of Han (US PGPub 20040034523). With regard to claims 24-26, Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt may not explicitly teach wherein the language learning information provided to the user terminal and stored in the learning note includes an example sentence, generated by the server, using the word extracted or selected from the sentence, and wherein the example sentence differs from the sentence translated from the learning target image. However, Han teaches a system and method for learning language including exemplary sentences using a selected word and providing an image related to the selected word and outputting the exemplary sentences for learning a foreign language (Paragraphs 0023, 0030, 0036, 0046). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt to incorporate the teachings of Han by including exemplary sentences using a selected word as taught by Holt for the selected words/regions of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, and Cha as, while Kim and Solntseva do not explicitly state the intended use of education, the translation/OCR of Kim in view of Solntseva can reasonably be used for education/learning purposes by someone that does not know the language and thereby use the method as taught by Han in order to further user learning and comprehension. One of ordinary skill in the art would modify Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt by coding the system to include presenting exemplary sentences of a selected word in a pop-up or on a new webpage as taught by Holt thereby including exemplary sentences as additional materials to further user learning and comprehension. Upon such modification, the method and system of Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, Nielson, and Holt would include wherein the language learning information provided to the user terminal and stored in the learning note includes an example sentence, generated by the server, using the word extracted or selected from the sentence, and wherein the example sentence differs from the sentence translated from the learning target image. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate these teachings from Holt with Kim in view of Solntseva, Cho, Cha, and Nielson’s system and method in order to further user learning and comprehension by providing additional resources including exemplary sentences (Han Paragraphs 0003, 0051). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see Remarks, filed August 20, 2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 5-12, 14-15, and 19-20 under 35 U.S.C. 101 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed January 12, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 5-12, 14-15, and 19-23 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive by virtue of Applicant’s amendments to the claims. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 U.S.C. 103 in view of the cited combination of prior art discussed above. Conclusion Accordingly, claims 1, 5-12, 14-15, and 19-26 are rejected. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CORRELL T FRENCH whose telephone number is (571)272-8162. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am-5pm; Alt Fri 7:30am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached on (571)270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CORRELL T FRENCH/Examiner, Art Unit 3715 /KANG HU/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Aug 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Dec 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 23, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 12, 2026
Response Filed
May 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12670810
SURGICAL SIMULATOR AND SIMULATION METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658065
METHOD FOR PREDICTING GAS EXPLOSION, VR-BASED EMERGENCY TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12640048
ADJUSTABLE SIMULATION RIG AND A SEATING UNIT FOR USE THEREWITH
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12614474
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIMULATING A TYMPANIC MEMBRANE
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609048
DRIVING DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE, DRIVING DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM, MACHINE LEARNING DEVICE AND GENERATION METHOD OF LEARNED MODEL
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+33.5%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 130 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month