Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Naver Corporation

14 pending office actions • 13 art units • 14 examiners • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 40 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 14 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

7
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 14 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (7)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (7%)
12
Medium (86%)
1
Easy (7%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (7%)
§103 only11 (79%)
§102 only1 (7%)
§112 only1 (7%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
36% of docket
4
Communications
29% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZEVITZ, DANIELLE ELIZABETH 1 33.3% +57.9%
MORRISON, JAY A 1 81.0% +23.6%
OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 1 16.3% +14.3%
SERRAGUARD, SEAN ERIN 1 69.7% +33.0%
LI, ALBERT 1 88.1% +19.9%
LEE, CLAY C 1 54.5% +57.1%
MONIKANG, GEORGE C 1 74.8% +7.7%
TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 1 28.4% +39.0%
LEE, JANGWOEN 1 83.3% +22.4%
CAI, PHUONG HAU 1 79.8% +20.6%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18312703 NEURAL RANKING MODEL FOR GENERATING SPARSE REPRESENTATIONS FOR INFORMATION RETRIEVAL LEE, JANGWOEN 28d overdue
18895541 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING CATEGORIES FOR SEARCH QUERY MORRISON, JAY A 3d overdue
18658179 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MANAGING MULTI-ZONE DATA CENTER FAILURES LI, ALBERT 29d

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18450702 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A SCHEMATIC MAP TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 23d overdue
18813452 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING INFORMATION OF INFORMATION PROVIDER BASED ON CONVERSATION WITH INFORMATION PROVIDER OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 41d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18312703 NEURAL RANKING MODEL FOR GENERATING SPARSE REPRESENTATIONS FOR INFORMATION RETRIEVAL LEE, JANGWOEN 28d overdue
18450702 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A SCHEMATIC MAP TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 23d overdue
18165022 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE OF IMAGE TAGGING MODEL CAI, PHUONG HAU 17d overdue
18895541 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING CATEGORIES FOR SEARCH QUERY MORRISON, JAY A 3d overdue
19090945 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REVIEW MANAGEMENT SERVICE ZEVITZ, DANIELLE ELIZABETH 16d
18658179 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MANAGING MULTI-ZONE DATA CENTER FAILURES LI, ALBERT 29d
18813452 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING INFORMATION OF INFORMATION PROVIDER BASED ON CONVERSATION WITH INFORMATION PROVIDER OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 41d
18777986 METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR REAL-TIME INSPECTOR IN LIVE COMMERCE PLATFORM SERRAGUARD, SEAN ERIN 43d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3628 2
2151 1
3622 1
2657 1
2113 1
3699 1
2692 1
3625 1
2656 1
2673 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19090945 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REVIEW MANAGEMENT SERVICE ZEVITZ, DANIELLE ELIZABETH 3628 §103 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Mar 26, 2025
18895541 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING CATEGORIES FOR SEARCH QUERY MORRISON, JAY A 2151 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Sep 25, 2024
18813452 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING INFORMATION OF INFORMATION PROVIDER BASED ON CONVERSATION WITH INFORMATION PROVIDER OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF 3622 §103 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Aug 23, 2024
18777986 METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR REAL-TIME INSPECTOR IN LIVE COMMERCE PLATFORM SERRAGUARD, SEAN ERIN 2657 §103 Non-Final OA 43d Pending Jul 19, 2024
18658179 METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MANAGING MULTI-ZONE DATA CENTER FAILURES LI, ALBERT 2113 §103 Non-Final OA 29d Pending May 08, 2024
18653424 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING KEYWORD REVIEWS LEE, CLAY C 3699 §103 Non-Final OA 84d Pending May 02, 2024
18417335 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRAINING RETRIEVERS AND RERANKERS USING ADAPTERS MONIKANG, GEORGE C 2692 §103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2024
18450702 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A SCHEMATIC MAP TORRICO-LOPEZ, ALAN 3625 §101 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Aug 16, 2023
18312703 NEURAL RANKING MODEL FOR GENERATING SPARSE REPRESENTATIONS FOR INFORMATION RETRIEVAL LEE, JANGWOEN 2656 §103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending May 05, 2023
18165022 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE OF IMAGE TAGGING MODEL CAI, PHUONG HAU 2673 §102 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Feb 06, 2023
18055613 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR META-LEARNING OF NEURAL COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION HEURISTICS SALCE, JASON P 2421 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Nov 15, 2022
18054327 METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING OPTIMAL PATH HARRINGTON, MICHAEL P 3628 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Nov 10, 2022
17514698 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LEARNING REPRESENTATIONS LESS PRONE TO CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING HONORE, EVEL NMN 2142 §103 Final Rejection 70d overdue Pending Oct 29, 2021
17383860 SUPERLOSS: A GENERIC LOSS FOR ROBUST CURRICULUM LEARNING ZECHER, CORDELIA P K 2100 §112 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Jul 23, 2021

Managing Naver Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month