Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/480,603

ILLUMINATION DEVICES FOR INDUCING BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Examiner
PORTER, JR, GARY A
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Know Bio LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
532 granted / 772 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
834
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 772 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 24 only repeats the limitation already present in Claim 15. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Eltorai (2019/0168023). In regard to Claims 1, 2, 15 and 24, Eltorai discloses a catheter (Abstract),such as used in a ventilator, par. [0085], having a light source (light transmitter 24, Abstract, par. [0071]; Fig. 1A) and a light guide that is hollow to permit air flow (such as common in ventilator catheters (par. [0085]). Claims 3 and 4 amount to intended use recitations of the device of Claim 1. Eltorai discloses the catheter can be a ventilator tube and therefore is insertable in the mouth and capable of targeting tissue via the mouth (par. [0085]). Regarding Claims 5 and 16, Eltorai discloses the catheter can facilitate draining of fluids (par. [0005, 0018]) such as through drain 16 (par. [0071]; Fig. 1A). In regard to Claim 6, Applicant claims the intended use of suctioning by the tube. Eltorai discloses that the tube can be capable of suctioning fluid (par. [0018, 0085]). With regard to Claims 7 and 17, Eltorai discloses the device is configured to emit light through the hollow core (tube), see Abstract; par. [0070]). Regarding Claims 8 and 18, Eltorai discloses emitting light through a cross-sectional area of the light guide (see Fig. 3A-3D). In regard to Claim 9, Eltorai discloses the light is configured to provide antimicrobial effects (alter growth and/or concentration of microbes), see par. [0018]). With regard to Claims 10-13 and 19-22, Eltorai discloses applying light in the range of 400-500nm to target microbes such as spore forming bacteria (par. [0019]). Regarding Claims 14 and 23, Eltorai discloses the light may be pulsed (par. [0018, 0075]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Basiony (2017/0281966) Gaska et al. (2007/0187626) Vazales et al. (2011/0023885) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALLEN PORTER whose telephone number is (571)270-5419. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:00-6:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carl Layno can be reached at 571-272-4949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALLEN PORTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588827
DETERMINING DIFFERENT SLEEP STAGES IN A WEARABLE MEDICAL DEVICE PATIENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589248
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING CARDIAC EVENT OVERSENSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12539418
ACCELEROMETER-BASED SENSING FOR SLEEP DISORDERED BREATHING (SDB) CARE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12515061
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY MODE SWITCHING USING MECHANICAL ACTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12514636
MAGNETIC FIELD PHASE DRIFT VERIFIER AND COOLING SYSTEM CHECKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+24.8%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 772 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month