Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/480,645

DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Priority
Nov 11, 2022 — TW 111143261
Examiner
NICELY, JOSEPH C
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
AUO Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
615 granted / 793 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
831
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
78.7%
+38.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 793 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner notes that claims 10 and 15-20 were cancelled in the response filed 3/11/2026. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, Species V (claims 1-9 and 11-14) in the reply filed on 3/11/2026 is acknowledged. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: in lines 3-4, "the third portion is connected with the third portion" should be amended to read -the fourth portion is connected with the third portion-. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lu et al (US 2022/0328611 and Lu hereinafter) in view of Matsushima (US 2012/0091440 and Matsushima hereinafter) with supporting evidence from Sakakibara (US 2026/0049244 and Sakakibara hereinafter). Lu discloses a display panel (Figs. 14a-14c; [0273]), comprising: an array substrate (Fig. 14c) comprising: a carrier board (substrate; [0150] and [0273]); a dielectric layer stack (85 comprises at least an interlayer insulating layer, which is interpreted to be the claimed dielectric layer stack; [0150]-[0151]) over the carrier board (substrate); a first electrode pad (lower half of 4; [0150] and [0273]) over the dielectric layer stack (interlayer insulating layer within 85; [0150]-[0151] and [0273]); and a second electrode pad (6; [0273]) over the dielectric layer stack (interlayer insulating layer within 85) and adjacent to the first electrode pad (4), and the first electrode pad (lower half of 4) and the second electrode pad (6) provide different potentials (Fig. 1a; 6 is connected to VSS and 4 is connected to VDD; [0111], [0391], and [0409]); a light-emitting diode chip (“G” area comprises the organic light emitting material layer 83; [0158]) comprising a first electrode (upper half of 4; [0150] and [0273]) and a second electrode (51 over “G” area; [0273]) at opposite sides (top and bottom) of the light-emitting diode chip (“G” area comprises the organic light emitting material layer 83), and the first electrode (upper half of 4) connected with the first electrode pad (lower half of 4); a first material layer (80; [0132]) over the array substrate and surrounding the light-emitting diode chip (“G” area), wherein the first material layer (80) comprises an opening (in which 51 is formed) exposing the second electrode pad (6), and a first conductive layer (51 outside of “G” area overlap; [0273]) over the first material layer (80) and electrically connecting the second electrode pad (6) and the second electrode (51 over “G” area). Lu fails to expressly disclose where the first material layer is a photosensitive material layer; where a sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer has a first portion and a second portion, a first slope of the first portion of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer is greater than a second slope of the second portion of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer, and a vertical projection of the first portion of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer on the array substrate is smaller than a vertical projection of the second portion of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer on the array substrate; where the first conductive layer is transparent. Lu discloses that the first material layer is a pixel defining layer, see [0132]. Matsushima discloses a display device with a bank/pixel defining layer 605, see Fig. 17A and [0209], where the first material layer (Fig. 17A; 605; [02209]) is a photosensitive material layer (105/605 can comprise an acrylic resin or polyimide resin, which are photosensitive materials as disclosed by Sakakibara in [0027]; [0119] of Matsushima); where a sidewall of the opening (shown in Fig. 17A as the segmented sidewall of 605 over 104) of the first photosensitive material layer (605) has a first portion (P61-P62; [0209]) and a second portion (P62-P63; [0209]), a first slope of the first portion (P61-P62) of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer (605) is greater (since θy1 is greater than θy2, the slope of P61-P62 is greater than that of P62-P63; [0209]) than a second slope of the second portion (P62-P63) of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer (605), and a vertical projection (length of P61-P62 onto 104) of the first portion (P61-P62) of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer (605) on the array substrate (104) is smaller (length of P61-P62 is smaller than that of P62-P63) than a vertical projection (length of P62-P63 onto 104) of the second portion (P62-P63) of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer (605) on the array substrate (104); where the first conductive layer (Fig. 2; 108 is a cathode layer; [0128]) is transparent (108 is transparent; [0130]). Given the teachings of Matsushima with supporting evidence from Sakakibara, a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have readily recognized the desirability and advantages of modifying Lu by employing the well-known or conventional features of display fabrication, such as displayed by Matsushima with supporting evidence from Sakakibara, by employing a photosensitive bank material that comprises multiple sections with different slopes and lengths as claimed and a transparent material for the cathode layer in order to provide a means to provide uniform film thickness in the organic light-emitting layer across the entire panel ([0009[) and to increase light extraction efficiency ([0131]). Claims 9, 11, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lu in view of Tsuruoka (US 2019/0165078 and Tsuruoka hereinafter) in view of Matsushima with supporting evidence from Sakakibara. As to claims 9, 11, and 13: Lu discloses [claim 9] a display panel (Figs. 14a-14c; [0273]), comprising: an array substrate (Fig. 14c) comprising: a carrier board (substrate; [0150] and [0273]); an active component (Fig. 3; transistor T5; [0100]) over the carrier board (substrate); a dielectric layer stack (85 comprises at least an interlayer insulating layer, which is interpreted to be the claimed dielectric layer stack; [0150]-[0151]) over the active component (transistor T5) and the carrier board (substrate); a first electrode pad (lower half of 4; [0150] and [0273]) over the dielectric layer stack (interlayer insulating layer within 85; [0150]-[0151] and [0273]) and connected with the active component (as shown in Fig. 3, the anode of the OLED is connected to T5); and a second electrode pad (6; [0273]) over the dielectric layer stack (interlayer insulating layer within 85) and adjacent to the first electrode pad (4); a light-emitting diode chip (“G” area comprises the organic light emitting material layer 83; [0158]) comprising a first electrode (upper half of 4; [0150] and [0273]) and a second electrode (51 over “G” area; [0273]) at opposite sides (top and bottom) of the light-emitting diode chip (“G” area comprises the organic light emitting material layer 83), and the first electrode (upper half of 4) connected with the first electrode pad (lower half of 4); a first material layer (81; [0126]) over the array substrate and surrounding the light-emitting diode chip (81 is formed such that it extends beyond the edges of the “G” area and the electrode 4 and thus surrounds the chip from underneath), wherein the first material layer (81) comprises an opening (in which 51 is formed) exposing the second electrode pad (6); a first transparent conductive layer (Fig. 4a; 10 can be the same material as 4, which comprises an ITO layer, which is transparent; [0318] and [0112]) over the first material layer (81) and in contact with the second electrode pad (6); a second material layer (80; [0132]) over the first material layer (81) and surrounding the light-emitting diode chip (“G” area), wherein the second material layer (80) comprises an opening (in which 51 is formed) exposing the second electrode pad (6) and a portion of the first material layer (81); and a second conductive layer (Figs. 4c and 18; 51; [0273]) over the second material layer (80) and the first transparent conductive layer (10); [claim 11] wherein the first transparent conductive layer (Fig. 18; 10) is between the first material layer (81) and the second material layer (80). Lu fails to expressly disclose where [claims 9 and 11] the first material layer is a photosensitive material layer. Lu discloses that the first material layer 81 is a planarization layer, see [0275]. Tsuruoka discloses a display device and states that planarization layers, such as layer 102 in Fig. 10, can comprise a photosensitive acrylic resin, see [0035]. Given the teachings of Tsuruoka, a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have readily recognized the desirability and advantages of modifying Lu by employing the well-known or conventional features of display device fabrication, such as displayed by Tsuruoka, by employing a photosensitive acrylic resin as the planarization layer 81 in order to provide a material that can provide a flat upper surface ([0035]). Lu in view of Tsuruoka fail to expressly disclose [claims 9 and 11] where the second material layer is a photosensitive material; where the second conductive layer is transparent; [claim 12] wherein a sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer has a first portion and a second portion, the first portion is closer to the second electrode pad, the second portion is farther away from the second electrode pad, a first slope of the first portion of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer is greater than a second slope of the second portion of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer. Matsushima discloses a display device with a bank/pixel defining layer 605, see Fig. 17A and [0209], [claims 9 and 11] where the second material layer (Fig. 17A; 605; [02209]) is a photosensitive material layer (105/605 can comprise an acrylic resin or polyimide resin, which are photosensitive materials as disclosed by Sakakibara in [0027]; [0119] of Matsushima); where the second conductive layer (Fig. 2; 108 is a cathode layer; [0128]) is transparent (108 is transparent; [0130]); [claim 12] wherein a sidewall of the opening (shown in Fig. 17A as the segmented sidewall of 605 over 104) of the first photosensitive material layer (605) has a first portion (P61-P62; [0209]) and a second portion (P62-P63; [0209]), the first portion (P61-P62) is closer to the second electrode pad (6), the second portion (P62-P63) is farther away from the second electrode pad (6), a first slope of the first portion (P61-P62) of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer (605) is greater (since θy1 is greater than θy2, the slope of P61-P62 is greater than that of P62-P63; [0209]) than a second slope of the second portion (P62-P63) of the sidewall of the opening of the first photosensitive material layer (605). Given the teachings of Matsushima with supporting evidence from Sakakibara, a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have readily recognized the desirability and advantages of modifying Lu by employing the well-known or conventional features of display fabrication, such as displayed by Matsushima with supporting evidence from Sakakibara, by employing a photosensitive bank material that comprises multiple sections with different slopes as claimed and lengths and a transparent material for the cathode layer in order to provide a means to provide uniform film thickness in the organic light-emitting layer across the entire panel ([0009[) and to increase light extraction efficiency ([0131]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8, 13, and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims and if claim 13 is rewritten to overcome the claim objection noted above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH C NICELY whose telephone number is (571)270-3834. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 am - 4 pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Gauthier can be reached at (571) 270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOSEPH C. NICELY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2813 /JOSEPH C. NICELY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813 4/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684809
SPLIT-GATE MOSFET AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672291
MEMORY DEVICE CONTAINING FERROELECTRIC-SPACER-FERROELECTRIC MEMORY ELEMENTS AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12641784
MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622037
GATE CUT SUBSEQUENT TO REPLACEMENT GATE
4y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615830
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.8%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 793 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month