Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/486,416

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 13, 2023
Examiner
ERDEM, FAZLI
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
895 granted / 1050 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1082
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1050 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions. Applicant’s election of claims 1-11 in the reply filed on 2/3/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 12-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a non-elected method claims, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chen et al. (20230260977) Regarding Claim 1, in Fig 12, (and Fig 8) (and paragraph 0041) Chen et al. discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a power delivery network layer 130A/130B; an insulating layer 142 (see Fig. 8) disposed on the power delivery network layer 130A/130B (see paragraph 0041) and having an opening (the spacing/opening/gap between the elements 126 and between through vias 136, see paragraph 0037) therein; a semiconductor layer 124 (see paragraph 0037) filling the opening (the spacing/opening/gap between the elements 126 and between through vias 136, see paragraph 0037) and covering the insulating layer 142 (when looked from the bottom direction); a first through-via 136 (third through via from the right sidewall of 124) extending through the semiconductor layer 124 and electrically connected to the power delivery network layer 130A/130B; a second through-via 136 (second one from the right sidewall of 124) extending through the insulating layer 142 and the semiconductor layer 124 and electrically connected to the power delivery network layer 130A/130B (see Fig. 12 and paragraph 0041); a logic element 126 (for example a transistor as discussed in paragraph 0037) on the semiconductor layer 124 and electrically connected to the first through-via 136 (second one from the right sidewall of 124) ; and a passive element, trench capacitors 128, on the semiconductor layer 124 and electrically connected to the second through-via 136 (second one from the right sidewall of 124) (see paragraphs 0037 and 0038). Regarding Claim 2, in paragraph 0012, a signal wiring layer i.e. RDL 110 or RDL 106, electrically connected to the logic element 126 (i.e. transistors see paragraph 0037) and the passive element (i.e. trench capacitors 128, see paragraph 0037), wherein the signal wiring layer 106 is on a side of the logic element 126 and the passive element 128 opposite the first through-via and the second through-via. Regarding Claim 3, the semiconductor layer 124 includes silicon (see paragraph 0037), and the insulating layer 142 includes silicon oxide (see paragraph 0042) Regarding Claim 4, the logic element 126 (i.e. transistor) includes: a semiconductor substrate (see paragraph 0037); an active pattern disposed on the semiconductor substrate (see paragraph 0037); a power rail, i.e. 130A connected to the first through-via 136 and having a portion in the semiconductor substrate; and a contact electrically connecting the power rail and the active pattern to each other (see paragraph 0037, lines 10-23). Regarding Claim 5, a lower surface of the insulating layer 142 and a lower surface of the semiconductor layer 124 are coplanar with each other (please note that with respect to lower surface, this has not been tied to any specific orientation and hence examiner can take “flipped” and/or regular orientations of elements 142 and 124 to arrive at the coplanar limitations) Regarding Claim 6, the first through-via includes 136 (specifically the third one from the right sidewall of element 124) a material different from a material of the second through-via 136 (specifically the second through via from the right sidewall of element 124)(also see paragraph 0038) Regarding Claim 7, a maximum width of the first through-via 136 (specifically the third one from the right sidewall of element 124) is different from a maximum width of the second through-via (specifically the second through via from the right sidewall of element 124 (see also paragraph 0053. Please also note that “width” limitation is not tied to a specific orientation) Regarding Claim 8, the maximum width of the first through-via is smaller than the maximum width of the second through-via. (again, the “width” limitation is not tied to any geometrical portion of “through-via” and hence examiner can take any geometrical relationship to arrive at this limitation. Please also see paragraph 0053). Regarding Claim 9, in Fig 12, (and Fig 8) (and paragraph 0041) Chen et al. discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate layer 124 including an insulating layer 142 (see Fig. 8) and a semiconductor layer 124, wherein the substrate layer includes: a first area (left half portion of the Figure 12) including the semiconductor layer 124; and a second area (right half of the Figure 12) different from the first area and including a stack of the insulating layer142 and the semiconductor layer 124; a logic element 126 (transistor, see paragraphs 0037 and 0053) and a passive element 128 (trench capacitors, see paragraphs 0037 and 0053) on a first (upper/top) surface of the substrate layer 124, wherein the logic element 126 is disposed on the first area (left half portion) of the substrate layer 124 and the passive element 128 is disposed on the second area (the right half portion) of the substrate layer 124; a signal wiring layer 130B on the first (top or upper) surface of the substrate layer 124 and electrically connected to the logic element and the passive element (see paragraphs 0037 and 0041); and a power delivery network layer 130A on a second (lower or bottom) surface of the substrate layer 124 opposite to the first surface. Regarding Claim 10, a first through-via 136 (specifically the third one from the right sidewall of element 124) extending through the semiconductor layer of the first area and electrically connected to the power delivery network layer and the logic element 126 (see paragraphs 0037, 0041); and a second through-via 136 (the second on from the right sidewall of element 124) extending through the stack of the second area (right half portion of 124) and electrically connected to the power delivery network 130B layer and the passive element 128 (see paragraph 0037 and 0041) Regarding Claim 11, the logic element 126 includes: a semiconductor substrate; an active pattern on the semiconductor substrate; a power rail connected to the first through-via and having a portion in the semiconductor substrate (paragraph 0037); and a contact electrically connecting the power rail and the active pattern to each other (see paragraph 0037, lines 10-23). Cited Pertinent Prior Art Examiner is including Lee et al. (2022/0165721) and Kim et al. (20230260893) as pertinent prior arts that are not relied upon but that do disclose integration of active and passive devices and the power network that electrically connects to integrated active and passive devices Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAZLI ERDEM whose telephone number is (571)272-1914. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at 571-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAZLI ERDEM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 2/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593563
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593631
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588498
FINFET STRUCTURE WITH CONTROLLED AIR GAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581679
SPLIT-GATE POWER MOS DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581877
SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF METAL OXIDES USING SILANES AS AN INHIBITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1050 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month