DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to an amendment filed on 12/29/25. Claims 1, 5, and 8 are pending.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement(s) submitted on 10/20/25 have been considered by the Examiner and made of record in the application.
Response to Amendment
Amendments filed on 12/29/25 are under consideration. Claims 1 and 8 are amended.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1, 5, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Eriksson (EP4052983B1) in view of Kojo et al. (US 2021/0316724 Al and in further view of Ishihara et al. (EP2894081A2).
Regarding Claim 1, Eriksson teaches a vehicle control system for controlling a vehicle capable of autonomous driving, the vehicle control system comprising one or more processors configured to (Pg.2 col 1 lines 5-9 [0001] – “The present invention relates to a method for transitioning a drive mode of a vehicle from an assisted drive mode to an automated drive mode, a drive control system for a vehicle and a vehicle”) when an operation condition is satisfied, perform driving support control that controls at least one of steering, acceleration, and deceleration of the vehicle for improving travel safety of the vehicle or for stabilizing behavior of the vehicle during manual driving of the vehicle (Pg. 3 col 3 lines 15-20 [0012] – “…the low support level may comprise a longitudinal braking assistance and active safety functionalities, preferably provided by an activated lane keeping assist and an activated collision prevention assist, and/or an activated deceleration function…” (equates to driving support control & at least one of deceleration) & see also Pg. 3 col 3 lines 26-29 [0013] – “…the low support level only provides assistance when it is detected that a collision might occur, such as keeping the vehicle in lane when the vehicle comes close to lane boundaries…” (Equates to operation condition satisfaction & improving travel safety)) when receiving an autonomous driving start request to start the autonomous driving during operation of the driving support control, (Pg. 2 – [0006] – “According to a first aspect, there is provided a method for transitioning a drive mode of a vehicle from an assisted drive mode to an automated drive mode. The method comprises the following steps: providing an assisted drive mode configured to support a driver controlling the vehicle at a medium support level; receiving an activation request for activating an automated drive mode configured to control a driving of the vehicle autonomous” (equates to when receiving an autonomous driving start request to start the autonomous driving during operation of the driving support control as the quote shows a request to switch from an assisted driver mode (equivalent to the driving support control) to the autonomous driving mode.)); as before the autonomous driving start request ((Pg. 2 – [0006] – “receiving an activation request for activating an automated drive mode configured to control a driving of the vehicle autonomously; ” & See Also Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11).” (equates to as before the autonomous driving start request as the quotes show an autonomous driving request being received and a mode of travel being maintained until a request for autonomous driving is made))) set a first time as a transition suspension time; (Pg. 11 – Fig. 4 – t1 to t2 & See Also Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11 ). The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms, describes the transitioning from the assisted drive mode AS to the safe assisted drive mode ADAS” (equates to set a first time as a transition suspension time as the art shows a suspension time from activating the automated drive mode from the assisted drive mode as provided. ) ) set a second time as the transition suspension time, wherein the second time is longer than the first time; (Pg. 6 – [0043] – “activation request failed, the safe assisted drive mode ADAS is maintained beyond the time t2 and the second in-lane target area boundaries L2, R2 of the lateral lane control LLC are maintained” (equates to set a second time as the transition suspension time, wherein the second time is longer than the first time; as the quote shows how the request fails and a time different from the first time is set as the time extends past the t2 marker (as seen in figure 5) and the time is made to go past the successful activation time as these case is dealing with an unsuccessful transition into automated driving mode.)) and permit starting the autonomous driving only (Pg. 5 col 7 lines 30-33 [0037] – “If the activation request is successful (YES in 30 Figure 2), the support level SL is increased from the safe assisted drive mode ADAS to the automated drive mode…” & See Pg. 5 col 8 lines 34-36 [0041] – “. The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & Also see Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-46 [0042] – “at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated” (equates permit and permit starting the autonomous driving only as the quotes show that the activation request has been received by the vehicle and that the automated driving is only started after the t1 to t2 or transition time has elapsed)). if a permission condition is satisfied, (Pg. 5 col 8 lines 34-36 [0041] – “. The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & Also see Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-46 [0042] – “at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated” (equates to if a permission condition is satisfied as the transition suspension time between driving modes can be the condition as this quote show it elapsing before transitioning to the next drive mode.)) as before the autonomous driving start request, (Pg. 2 – [0006] – “receiving an activation request for activating an automated drive mode configured to control a driving of the vehicle autonomously; ” & See Also Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11).” (equates to as before the autonomous driving start request as the quotes show an autonomous driving request being received and a mode of travel being maintained until a request for autonomous driving is made)) if the permission condition is not satisfied, (Pg. 3 – [0015] – “In case, the activation of the automated drive mode fails, the driver may then for example, recognize that the vehicle is getting slower, and by this, perceiving that the transition to the automated drive mode has not been successful” &See Also Pg. 3 – [0021] – “the safe assisted drive mode may be maintained for a predefined amount of time, or until receiving an interaction request of the driver.” (equates to if the permission condition is not satisfied, as the first quote shows the activation failing and the second quote showing the permission condition being that of time elapsing and thus the activation can fail base don not meeting the desired time setpoint.)) and the permission condition is satisfied when the transition suspension time elapses after the autonomous driving start request is received. (Pg. 5 col 8 lines 34-36 [0041] – “. The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & Also see Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-46 [0042] – “at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated” (equates to and the permission condition is satisfied when the transition suspension time elapses after the autonomous driving start request is received as this quote show it elapsing before transitioning to the next drive mode.))
Yet Eriksson fails to teach determine, while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect, whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control; when the first control direction is consistent with the second control direction; when the first control direction is not consistent with the second control direction, wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction; continue the driving support control to the same effect.
Ishihara discloses a similar vehicle control system for automated driving (abstract). Ishihara teaches determine whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control (Pg. 1 – [0002] – “…automated cruise control under which a vehicle performs automated cruise, a vehicle control apparatus controls a steering apparatus based on information on, for example, a lane obtained by an in-vehicle camera such that a vehicle travelling path (path along which the vehicle is actually travelling) coincides with a target travelling path” (equates to determine whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control as the quote shows an automated cruise control which is equivalent to the driving support control described in this application, and the quote shows how a target direction (first direction) has to coincide with the actual direction (second direction) hence a consistency check is done between two target directions.)) when the first control direction is consistent with the second control direction; (Pg. 9 – [0066] – “Specifically, the sign of the travelling path curvature radius RA when the vehicle 1 turns to the right is made to coincide with the sign of the lane curvature radius RB when the constant "a" is a positive value” (equates to when the first control direction is consistent with the second control direction; as the quote shows the traveling path (second direction ) being made consistent with the lane curvature (first direction) and the quote shows the paths being made to align and how that effects their control equation.)) when the first control direction is not consistent with the second control direction. (Pg. 5 – [0033] – “travelling path LY of the vehicle 1 does not coincide with the lane curvature radius RB of the center line LC of the lane,” (equates to when the first control direction is not consistent with the second control direction as the target direction is shown by the lane curvature and is equivalent to the first control direction and the traveling path is equivalent to the second control direction where the quote shows the paths not aligning.))
Yet Both fail to teach , while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect, wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction; continue the driving support control to the same effect.
Kojo teaches, while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect, (Pg. 10 – [0008] – “The controller is configured to continue the driving assistance control in a period from the requested timing to a timing when a predetermined termination condition is satisfied” & See Also Pg. 14 & 15 – [0072] – “period until an elapsed time Tep from the requested timing reaches a predetermined time threshold Tmth is a transition period during which the driving operation (steering control) makes transition from the LKA to the driver. In the transition period, the LKA is continued (that is, the driving assistance operation status is kept ON).” (equates to while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect as the quote shows the driving assistance control being continued to be performed until a termination condition is satisfied and the second quote shows lane keeping assist specifically being the driving support control that is continued while the transition suspension time is elapsing before the driving mode is changed.)) continue the driving support control to the same effect. (Pg. 10 – [0008] – “The controller is configured to continue the driving assistance control in a period from the requested timing to a timing when a predetermined termination condition is satisfied” & See Also Pg. 14 & 15 – [0072] – “period until an elapsed time Tep from the requested timing reaches a predetermined time threshold Tmth is a transition period during which the driving operation (steering control) makes transition from the LKA to the driver. In the transition period, the LKA is continued (that is, the driving assistance operation status is kept ON).” (equates to continue the driving support control to the same effect as the quote shows the driving assistance control being continued to be performed until a termination condition is satisfied and the second quote shows lane keeping assist specifically being the driving support control that is continued while the transition suspension time is elapsing before the driving mode is changed.))
Yet all fail to teach wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction.
Eade teaches wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, (Pg. 10 – Col. 1 – lines – 62 – 67 – “…including determining a first lateral velocity for the vehicle using one or more primary sensors in communication with the primary vehicle control system and using the determined first lateral velocity to 65 control the vehicle, determining a redundant, second lateral velocity using one or more additional sensors…” (equates to including wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction as the quote shows the first control direction being a first lateral velocity and the second lateral velocity being the second control direction.)) and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction. (Pg. 10 – Col. 1 – lines – 62 – 67 – “…including determining a first lateral velocity for the vehicle using one or more primary sensors in communication with the primary vehicle control system and using the determined first lateral velocity to 65 control the vehicle, determining a redundant, second lateral velocity using one or more additional sensors…” & See Also Pg. 19 – Col. 19 – lines 42 -50 – “Thus, based upon the images selected in block 358, block 360 attempts to correlate the images captured at the current and prior time steps, e.g., using image processing to detect a positional offset between distinctive features in the respective images. Block 362 determines whether the correlation was successful, and if so, passes control to block 364 to calculate and store the aforementioned lateral and/or longitudinal displacements and/or velocities in the manner described above” (equates to and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction as the first quote shows the determination between the consistency between first and second control directions wherein the second quote shows the directions captured via imaging from the different sensor systems to coincide within block 362 and then the information is stored in block 364 based on a successful coinciding between the two measurements taken.) ) It would have been an advantageous addition to the system disclosed by Eriksson-Ishihara-Kojo to include wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction as the limitations included allows for two separate directions of the vehicle control system to be included allowing for either direction to be matched when understanding the heading of the vehicle.
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction as this allows for a specific heading direction of the vehicle to be selected for the matching.
Regarding Claim 5 Eriksson-Ishihara-Kojo-Eade teaches the vehicle control system according to claim 1, (Eriksson discloses the following limitations:) wherein the one or more processors are further configured to change the transition suspension time to a third time (Pg. 5 col 8 lines 31-36 [0041] - “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11). The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms”(Equates to setting a third time as the request can fail (SEE FIG. 5) and the process to receive an autonomous driving request would start again and if successful (See FIG. 4 ) a new time is set before the autonomous driving mode of the vehicle is activated. )) when the first control direction becomes consistent with the second control direction after setting the second time as the transition suspension time and during operation of the driving support control, and the third time is shorter than the second time. (Pg. 5 col 8 lines 31-36 [0041] - “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11). The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & See Also Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-49 [0042] In Figure 4, at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated. From the time t2 to the time t3 describes the transitioning from the safe assisted drive mode ADAS to the automated drive mode AD, (Equates to setting a third time that is shorter than the second time)).
Yet Eriksson-Kojo fails to specifically teach the vehicle control system determining whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control.
Ishihara discloses a similar vehicle control system for automated driving (abstract). Ishihara teaches when the first control direction becomes consistent with the second control direction; ([0002] – “…a vehicle control apparatus controls a steering apparatus based on information on, for example, a lane obtained by an in-vehicle camera such that a vehicle travelling path (path along which the vehicle is actually travelling) coincides with a target travelling path.…”). It would have been an advantageous addition to the system disclosed by Eriksson-Kojo to add information relating to the trajectory/target direction generated by the vehicle control system and the actual direction indicated by the vehicle during autonomous/driving support control functions to ensure both directions are in agreement before the driving support control is changed to autonomous driving mode.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the vehicle control system to collect information by both the trajectory/target direction and the actual direction taken by the vehicle to ensure the system is in agreement with itself before going into a fully autonomous mode to improve upon the uneasy feeling generated by the driver when they hand over control of their vehicle to a computer.
Regarding Claim 8, Eriksson teaches a method for controlling a vehicle capable of autonomous driving (Pg.2 col 1 lines 5-9 [0001] – “The present invention relates to a method for transitioning a drive mode of a vehicle from an assisted drive mode to an automated drive mode, a drive control system for a vehicle and a vehicle”) , the method comprising: when an operation condition is satisfied, performing driving support control that controls at least one of steering, acceleration, and deceleration of the vehicle for improving travel safety of the vehicle or for stabilizing behavior of the vehicle during manual driving of the vehicle; (Pg. 3 col 3 lines 15-20 [0012] – “…the low support level may comprise a longitudinal braking assistance and active safety functionalities, preferably provided by an activated lane keeping assist and an activated collision prevention assist, and/or an activated deceleration function…” (equates to driving support control & at least one of deceleration) & see also Pg. 3 col 3 lines 26-29 [0013] – “…the low support level only provides assistance when it is detected that a collision might occur, such as keeping the vehicle in lane when the vehicle comes close to lane boundaries…” (equates to operation condition satisfaction & improving travel safety)) And when receiving an autonomous driving start request to start the autonomous driving during operation of the driving support control,; (Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11 )) as before the autonomous driving start request, ((Pg. 2 – [0006] – “receiving an activation request for activating an automated drive mode configured to control a driving of the vehicle autonomously; ” & See Also Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11).” (equates to as before the autonomous driving start request as the quotes show an autonomous driving request being received and a mode of travel being maintained until a request for autonomous driving is made))) setting a first time as a transition suspension time (Pg. 11 – Fig. 4 – t1 to t2 & See Also Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11 ). The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms, describes the transitioning from the assisted drive mode AS to the safe assisted drive mode ADAS” (equates to set a first time as a transition suspension time as the art shows a suspension time from activating the automated drive mode from the assisted drive mode as provided. ) ) setting a second time as the transition suspension time, wherein the second time is longer than the first time; (Pg. 6 – [0043] – “activation request failed, the safe assisted drive mode ADAS is maintained beyond the time t2 and the second in-lane target area boundaries L2, R2 of the lateral lane control LLC are maintained” (equates to set a second time as the transition suspension time, wherein the second time is longer than the first time; as the quote shows how the request fails and a time different from the first time is set as the time extends past the t2 marker (as seen in figure 5) and the time is made to go past the successful activation time as these case is dealing with an unsuccessful transition into automated driving mode.)) and permitting starting the autonomous driving only ( Pg. 5 col 7 lines 30-33 [0037] – “If the activation request is successful (YES in 30 Figure 2), the support level SL is increased from the safe assisted drive mode ADAS to the automated drive mode…” & See Pg. 5 col 8 lines 34-36 [0041] – “. The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & Also see Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-46 [0042] – “at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated” (equates to and permitting starting the autonomous driving only as the request is seen in the quote that transitions the vehicle from the assisted mode to the autonomous mode and the quote also shows the time elapsing before the mode is activated.)). if a permission condition is satisfied, (Pg. 5 col 8 lines 34-36 [0041] – “. The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & Also see Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-46 [0042] – “at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated” (equates to if a permission condition is satisfied as the transition suspension time between driving modes can be the condition as this quote show it elapsing before transitioning to the next drive mode.)) as before the autonomous driving start request, (Pg. 2 – [0006] – “receiving an activation request for activating an automated drive mode configured to control a driving of the vehicle autonomously; ” & See Also Pg. 5 – [0041] – “The assisted drive mode AS is maintained until an activation request for activating the automated drive mode AD is received (time 11).” (equates to as before the autonomous driving start request as the quotes show an autonomous driving request being received and a mode of travel being maintained until a request for autonomous driving is made)) if the permission condition is not satisfied, (Pg. 3 – [0015] – “In case, the activation of the automated drive mode fails, the driver may then for example, recognize that the vehicle is getting slower, and by this, perceiving that the transition to the automated drive mode has not been successful” &See Also Pg. 3 – [0021] – “the safe assisted drive mode may be maintained for a predefined amount of time, or until receiving an interaction request of the driver.” (equates to if the permission condition is not satisfied, as the first quote shows the activation failing and the second quote showing the permission condition being that of time elapsing and thus the activation can fail base don not meeting the desired time setpoint.)) and the permission condition is satisfied when the transition suspension time elapses after the autonomous driving start request is received. (Pg. 5 col 8 lines 34-36 [0041] – “. The interval from t1 to t2, the interval may preferably be between 300 ms and 3 s, more preferably between 300 ms and 1,5 s or between 300 ms and 700 ms” & Also see Pg. 5 col 8 lines 45-46 [0042] – “at time t2, the activation request is successful and the automated drive mode AD is activated” (equates to and the permission condition is satisfied when the transition suspension time elapses after the autonomous driving start request is received as this quote show it elapsing before transitioning to the next drive mode.))
Yet Eriksson fails to teach determining, while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect, wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction. whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control; when the first control direction is consistent with the second control direction; when the first control direction is not consistent with the second control direction, continuing the driving support control to the same effect.
Ishihara discloses a similar vehicle control system for automated driving (abstract). Ishihara teaches determining whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control (Pg. 1 – [0002] – “…automated cruise control under which a vehicle performs automated cruise, a vehicle control apparatus controls a steering apparatus based on information on, for example, a lane obtained by an in-vehicle camera such that a vehicle travelling path (path along which the vehicle is actually travelling) coincides with a target travelling path” (equates to determine whether or not a first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with a second control direction for the driving support control as the quote shows an automated cruise control which is equivalent to the driving support control described in this application, and the quote shows how a target direction (first direction) has to coincide with the actual direction (second direction) hence a consistency check is done between two target directions.)) when the first control direction is consistent with the second control direction; (Pg. 9 – [0066] – “Specifically, the sign of the travelling path curvature radius RA when the vehicle 1 turns to the right is made to coincide with the sign of the lane curvature radius RB when the constant "a" is a positive value” (equates to when the first control direction is consistent with the second control direction; as the quote shows the traveling path (second direction ) being made consistent with the lane curvature (first direction) and the quote shows the paths being made to align and how that effects their control equation.)) when the first control direction is not consistent with the second control direction. (Pg. 5 – [0033] – “travelling path LY of the vehicle 1 does not coincide with the lane curvature radius RB of the center line LC of the lane,” (equates to when the first control direction is not consistent with the second control direction as the target direction is shown by the lane curvature and is equivalent to the first control direction and the traveling path is equivalent to the second control direction where the quote shows the paths not aligning.))
Yet both fail to teach while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect, wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction. continuing the driving support control to the same effect.
Kojo teaches, while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect, (Pg. 10 – [0008] – “The controller is configured to continue the driving assistance control in a period from the requested timing to a timing when a predetermined termination condition is satisfied” & See Also Pg. 14 & 15 – [0072] – “period until an elapsed time Tep from the requested timing reaches a predetermined time threshold Tmth is a transition period during which the driving operation (steering control) makes transition from the LKA to the driver. In the transition period, the LKA is continued (that is, the driving assistance operation status is kept ON).” (equates to while the driving support control continues to be performed to a same effect as the quote shows the driving assistance control being continued to be performed until a termination condition is satisfied and the second quote shows lane keeping assist specifically being the driving support control that is continued while the transition suspension time is elapsing before the driving mode is changed.)) continuing the driving support control to the same effect.. (Pg. 10 – [0008] – “The controller is configured to continue the driving assistance control in a period from the requested timing to a timing when a predetermined termination condition is satisfied” & See Also Pg. 14 & 15 – [0072] – “period until an elapsed time Tep from the requested timing reaches a predetermined time threshold Tmth is a transition period during which the driving operation (steering control) makes transition from the LKA to the driver. In the transition period, the LKA is continued (that is, the driving assistance operation status is kept ON).” (equates to continuing the driving support control to the same effect as the quote shows the driving assistance control being continued to be performed until a termination condition is satisfied and the second quote shows lane keeping assist specifically being the driving support control that is continued while the transition suspension time is elapsing before the driving mode is changed.))
Yet all fail to teach wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction.
Eade teaches wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, (Pg. 10 – Col. 1 – lines – 62 – 67 – “…including determining a first lateral velocity for the vehicle using one or more primary sensors in communication with the primary vehicle control system and using the determined first lateral velocity to 65 control the vehicle, determining a redundant, second lateral velocity using one or more additional sensors…” (equates to including wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction as the quote shows the first control direction being a first lateral velocity and the second lateral velocity being the second control direction.)) and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction. (Pg. 10 – Col. 1 – lines – 62 – 67 – “…including determining a first lateral velocity for the vehicle using one or more primary sensors in communication with the primary vehicle control system and using the determined first lateral velocity to 65 control the vehicle, determining a redundant, second lateral velocity using one or more additional sensors…” & See Also Pg. 19 – Col. 19 – lines 42 -50 – “Thus, based upon the images selected in block 358, block 360 attempts to correlate the images captured at the current and prior time steps, e.g., using image processing to detect a positional offset between distinctive features in the respective images. Block 362 determines whether the correlation was successful, and if so, passes control to block 364 to calculate and store the aforementioned lateral and/or longitudinal displacements and/or velocities in the manner described above” (equates to and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction as the first quote shows the determination between the consistency between first and second control directions wherein the second quote shows the directions captured via imaging from the different sensor systems to coincide within block 362 and then the information is stored in block 364 based on a successful coinciding between the two measurements taken.) ) It would have been an advantageous addition to the system disclosed by Eriksson-Ishihara-Kojo to include wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction as the limitations included allows for two separate directions of the vehicle control system to be included allowing for either direction to be matched when understanding the heading of the vehicle.
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include wherein the first control direction includes at least one of a first lateral control direction or a first longitudinal control direction, and the second control direction includes at least one of a second lateral control direction or a second longitudinal control direction, and wherein, the first control direction is determined to be consistent with the second control direction when the first lateral control direction is consistent with the second lateral control direction or when the first longitudinal control direction is consistent with the second longitudinal control direction as this allows for a specific heading direction of the vehicle to be selected for the matching.
Response to Arguments
Regarding the argument provided for the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 7, the applicant’s arguments have been considered but are not persuasive.
Applicant argues on pages 2-3 – “Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Eriksson (EP4052983B1) in view of Kojo et al. (US 2021/0316724 Al).
Claims 1, 5, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Eriksson-Kojo in view of Ishihara et al. (EP2894081A2).
In view of the interview discussion, claims 1 and 8 are amended to clarify the first control direction and the second control direction, and when they are consistent.
In Applicant's vehicle control system having both an autonomous driving control and a driving support control, when an autonomous driving start request is made to start the autonomous driving after the driving support control starts to operate during the manual driving, the claimed configuration sets a transition suspension time based on the comparison of a first control direction for the autonomous driving with a second control direction for the driving support control. As a result, even when the autonomous driving start request is received during operation of the driving support control, the driving support control continues for a period of time based on the comparison of the first control direction for the autonomous driving with the second control direction for the driving support control.
Eriksson does not disclose any configuration related to comparing the first control direction for the autonomous driving with the second control direction for the driving support control, and therefore, does not perform any subsequent function based on such a comparison. As such, Eriksson fails to disclose or suggest setting different transition suspension times based on such a comparison.
Ishihara discloses at [0002] "When executing automated cruise control under which a vehicle performs automated cruise, a vehicle control apparatus controls a steering apparatus based on information on, for example, a lane obtained by an in-vehicle camera such that a vehicle travelling path (path along which the vehicle is actually travelling) coincides with a target travelling path". The vehicle traveling path and the target traveling path in Ishihara mean an actual traveling path of the vehicle when performing automated cruise and a target traveling path when performing automated cruise, and thus Ishihara does not compare the first control direction for the autonomous driving and the second control direction for the driving support control. In addition, Ishihara does not disclose comparing when receiving the autonomous driving start request to start the autonomous driving during operation of the driving support control.
Further, Ishihara does not disclose any configuration related to setting a transition suspension time. Even if one were to consider Eriksson to disclose this feature (which it does not), there is no suggestion that such a time is based on comparing the first control direction for the autonomous driving with the second control direction for the driving support control when receiving the autonomous driving start request to start the autonomous driving during operation of the driving support control.
Kojo merely discloses in [0073] "the driving assistance ECU 10 determines whether a magnitude |Tr| of the steering torque Tr detected by the steering torque sensor 14 is equal to or larger than a predetermined torque threshold Trth in the transition period." Kojo does not disclose the features related to determining whether or not the first control direction for the autonomous driving is consistent with the second control direction for the driving support control, and setting a transition suspension time based on such a consistency or comparison.
For the reasons discussed during the interview, and the explanations provided herein, amended claim 1 is not disclosed or suggested by the combination of cited references, and thus the rejection of claim 1 and dependent claim 5 should be withdrawn.
Independent claim 8 recites similar features as claim 1, and thus, the rejection of claim 8 should be withdrawn for similar reasons as claim 1. – Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, and 8 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2021/0171035 Al - Then, the vehicle control apparatus receives perceived information acquired from an external world perception portion, determines a situation of a running road lying ahead of the vehicle based on this perceived information, determines a steering instruction for steering the vehicle based on the situation of the running road, determines a braking/driving instruction for braking/ driving the vehicle based on the situation of the running road,.
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REECE ANTHONY WAKELY whose telephone number is (571) 272-3783. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30am-6:00pm EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hitesh Patel can be reached on (571) 270-5442. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/R.A.W./Examiner, Art Unit 3667
/Hitesh Patel/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3667
3/26/26
Prosecution Insights