Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/488,729

VERTICAL SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENT ON THE BASIS OF GALLIUM NITRIDE WITH A STRUCTURED INTERMEDIATE LAYER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 17, 2023
Priority
Oct 19, 2022 — DE 10 2022 211 042.0
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1068 granted / 1233 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1277
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
73.0%
+33.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1233 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 19-25 and 28-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Dadgar (20070197004). PNG media_image1.png 357 683 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 457 770 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 400 352 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 493 743 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, Dadgar teaches a method for producing a vertical semiconductor component (please see fig. 6a-6f above; please note that fig. 1 is shown to show the layer numbering), comprising the following steps: forming a semiconductor layer structure including at least one layer based on gallium nitride (GaN) (fig. 1 and 6a: 110), a vertically lower contact semiconductor layer (fig. 1 and 6a: 106), and at least one vertically higher electrode (fig. 6a: 124) on an intermediate layer (fig. 6a: 108+110) arranged on a substrate (fig. 6a: 104), the substrate being a foreign substrate (par. 108 teaches 104 is an Si wafer); connecting a carrier material (fig. 6a-6b: 132) on a side of the semiconductor layer structure facing away from the substrate; removing the substrate (fig. 6c shows removing 104); lithographically structuring the intermediate layer so that the contact semiconductor layer is exposed in some regions (fig. 6e and par. 145 teaches structuring 108 and exposing portions of 106) and at least a portion of the intermediate layer remains in some regions (fig. 6e and par. 145 teaches 108 remaining in areas); and forming an electrode (fig. 6f: 136) at least in the exposed regions of the contact semiconductor layer. Regarding claim 20, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the substrate is first removed by a grinding process and subsequently by an etching process (par. 145). Regarding claim 21, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 20, wherein the etching process is a wet chemical etching process (par. 145). Regarding claim 22, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein a portion of the intermediate layer is removed in an etching process (please see fig. 6e and 6f). Regarding claim 23, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the structuring of the intermediate layer includes a plasma etching process of an unmasked region (par. 145). Regarding claim 24, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein a metal stack layer, including aluminum and titanium, is formed under the structured intermediate layer (par. 19). Regarding claim 25, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 24 wherein the forming of the metal stack layer includes an annealing operation (par. 110 and 125). Regarding claim 28, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the electrode formed in the exposed regions of the contact semiconductor layer and the at least one vertically higher electrode together form at least two electrodes arranged vertically one above the other (please see fig. 6f above). Regarding claim 29, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the electrode formed in the exposed regions of the contact semiconductor layer and the at least one vertically higher electrode together form three electrodes arranged vertically one above the other (please see fig. 6f above). Regarding claim 30, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the electrode formed in the exposed regions of the contact semiconductor layer constitutes a vertically lower electrode that electrically contacts the contact semiconductor layer (please see fig. 6f above). Regarding claim 31, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the intermediate layer is configured to compensate for a lattice mismatch between the foreign substrate and the contact semiconductor layer (par. 119 and 129 teaches using 108 as a buffer for growth). Regarding claim 32, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein, after removal of the substrate, the vertical semiconductor component does not include the foreign substrate (please see fig. 6c). Regarding claim 33, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein, after structuring of the intermediate layer, the intermediate layer remains arranged vertically below the contact semiconductor layer in some regions (please see fig. 6f). Regarding claim 34, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the structuring of the intermediate layer leaves the intermediate layer remaining in an edge region of the vertical semiconductor component (please see fig. 6f). Regarding claim 35, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the intermediate layer includes a plurality of individual layers, and wherein at least one of the individual layers remains after the structuring of the intermediate layer (please see fig. 6a and 6f). Regarding claim 36, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the at least a portion of the intermediate layer that remains in the some regions after the structuring has a thickness of 2 um- 5 um (par. 83-89). Regarding claim 37, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the at least a portion of the intermediate layer that remains in the some regions after the structuring has a thickness of 3 um- 4 um (par. 83-89). Regarding claim 38, Dadgar teaches a method according to claim 19, wherein the vertical semiconductor component produced by the method is a transistor (par. 91). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 26 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 27 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635256
PASSIVE ELECTROSTATIC-DISCHARGE SENSOR AND METHOD FOR DETECTING ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGES
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628494
SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE WITH HIGH LEVEL OF CIRCULARITY AND ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628553
QUANTUM DOT MATERIAL, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628411
METHOD OF FORMING CONFINED GROWTH S/D CONTACT DEFINED BY SIDEWALL CONSTRAINTS WITH SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF INNER SPACER FOR CFET
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628705
DEVICE INCLUDING A PATTERNED CONDUCTIVE COATING
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1233 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month