Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/489,018

CELL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, CELL PROCESSING METHOD, AND BATTERY PRODUCTION LINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Priority
Nov 21, 2022 — CN 202211453858.4 +1 more
Examiner
SLIFKA, SARAH A
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
535 granted / 709 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
722
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 709 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-10 and 13, in the reply filed on 06/01/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 11-12 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN111916840 herein after referred to as ‘840. Regarding claim 1, ‘840 teaches a battery cell fitting device wherein the battery cell fitting device comprises a first transfer plate 12 and a first rotating plate 14, which are considered to be the instantly claimed first support assembly. The first rotating plate 14 is configured to fix a sub battery cell and to rotate around a first rotation axis. A second transfer plate 13 and a second rotating plate 15 are considered to constitute the second support assembly wherein the second rotating plate 15 is configured to fix a sub battery cell and rotate around a second rotation axis. The first rotation axis is parallel to the second rotation axis. A second positioning mechanism and a compression assembly (considered to be constitute the third support assembly) are configured to fix a tab and an end cap. The second positioning mechanism comprises a top cap base 51 (considered to be the instantly claimed support seat) and a compression assembly (considered to be the instantly claimed shaping piece) being movably arranged relative to the top cap base 51. A mounting base 11, the first transfer plate 12, the first rotating plate 14, the second transfer plate 13, and the second rotating plate 15 are movably arranged on the mounting base 11 in a first direction and respectively are arranged on two sides of the second positioning mechanism in the first direction. The second positioning mechanism is movably arranged on the mounting base 11 in a third direction (0044-0127 and figures 1-5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN111916840 herein after referred to as ‘840. Regarding claim 13, ‘840 teaches the battery cell fitting device, as discussed above. ‘840 does not explicitly teach the battery cell fitting device being included in a battery production line. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to utilize the battery cell fitting device of ‘840 in a battery production line as the battery cell fitting would be a useful part of the battery production and an ordinarily skilled artisan would have recognized using it as part of the battery production without undue experimentation and with a reasonable expectation of success. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. ‘840 teaches the battery cell fitting device, as discussed above. ‘840 neither teaches nor renders obvious the fixing bracket wherein the third support assembly being movably disposed on the fixing bracket along a second direction, and the second direction is perpendicular to the first direction. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH A SLIFKA whose telephone number is (571)270-5838. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH A. SLIFKA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759 July 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749732
CONFIGURING BATTERY PACKS FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749674
ELECTRODE AND ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749742
BATTERY SHELL ASSEMBLY AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12719046
Positive Electrode Including Positive Electrode Additive for Lithium Secondary Battery
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719088
Biphasic electrolyte solution comprising kosmotropic metal salt
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 709 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month