Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/489,082

Organic Light-Emitting Display Device

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Examiner
PARENDO, KEVIN A
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
532 granted / 742 resolved
+3.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
785
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 742 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions - NO TRAVERSE A restriction requirement was mailed on 12/10/25. Applicant’s election without traverse of species A in the reply filed on 12/18/25 is acknowledged. Claims 5-10 and 14-15 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102, some of which form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2018/0097047 A1 (“Jung”). Jung teaches, for example: PNG media_image1.png 452 743 media_image1.png Greyscale Jung teaches: 1. An organic light-emitting display device (see e.g. Fig. 3) comprising: a substrate 100 including a display area (e.g. active area AA, and possibly including subsets thereof or additional areas therearound, see e.g. Fig. 2B) having a plurality of sub-pixels (“sub-pixel” has not been defined, but the specification makes it clear that the display can emit multiple colors by use of color filters over certain light-emitting regions, and such light-emitting regions may reasonably be considered as subpixels, see e.g. para 83), and a non-display area (including areas such as pad area PA, see e.g. Fig. 2B); an auxiliary line (e.g. “lower low-voltage line (VSS) 121”) on the substrate between the plurality of sub-pixels (see e.g. Figs. 2B and 3); an auxiliary line connection part (e.g. comprising “upper low-voltage line (VSS) 122” and “auxiliary electrode 170”) connected to the auxiliary line; a passivation layer (e.g. “passivation layer 175”) on the auxiliary line connection part, the passivation layer configured to expose a part of the auxiliary line connection part in a contact area (see e.g. region near “contact space C” in “sixth contact hole CH6” in Fig. 3); an interlayer insulation layer (e.g. “insulating interlayer 140”) between the auxiliary line and the passivation layer (140 is between parts of 122/170 and parts of 175 at least at certain angles, see e.g. Fig. 3); a planarization layer (e.g. “planarization layer 178”) on the passivation layer, the planarization layer having an end that further protrudes toward the contact area than an end of the passivation layer (see portion of 178 in the circled region of annotated Fig. 3 below); and PNG media_image2.png 453 436 media_image2.png Greyscale a plurality of organic light-emitting elements (comprising e.g. “anode 180”, “organic emitting layer 210”, and “cathode 220”) on the planarization layer and on the plurality of sub-pixels, wherein the auxiliary line connection part comprises: a first auxiliary line connection part (e.g. 121) below the interlayer insulation layer, the first auxiliary line connection part connected to the auxiliary line (see e.g. Fig. 3); and a second auxiliary line connection part (e.g. 122 combined with 170) between the interlayer insulation layer and the passivation layer (see e.g. Fig. 3), the second auxiliary line connection part connected to the first auxiliary line connection part (see e.g. Fig. 3), wherein a cathode electrode (e.g. “cathode electrode 220”) of each of the plurality of organic light-emitting elements is in contact with the auxiliary line connection part in the contact area (see e.g. Fig. 3). 11. The organic light-emitting display device of claim 1, further comprising: a buffer layer (e.g. “buffer layer 125”) on the substrate, wherein the auxiliary line is between the substrate and the buffer layer (see e.g. Fig. 3), and wherein the first auxiliary line connection part is between the buffer layer and the interlayer insulation layer (see e.g. Fig. 3). 12. The organic light-emitting display device of claim 11, further comprising: a plurality of transistors (see e.g. “thin film transistor” comprising 126, 130, 150, 160, see e.g. para 45 and Fig. 3) on the plurality of sub-pixels, wherein the first auxiliary line connection part comprises a same material as a gate electrode of each of the plurality of transistors (see e.g. para 53 and 55), wherein the second auxiliary line connection part comprises a same material as a source electrode and a drain electrode of each of the plurality of transistors (see e.g. para 53 and 55). Claim(s) 1-2, 11, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by KR 10-2018-0013225 (“LG”) (see 4/19/24 IDS and applicant-submitted NPL copy) (also see machine-generated translation provided by the office with this action). LG teaches, for example: PNG media_image3.png 602 531 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 403 653 media_image4.png Greyscale LG teaches: 1. An organic light-emitting display device (see e.g. Figs. 1 and 4I) comprising: a substrate (e.g. 101) including a display area having a plurality of sub-pixels (see e.g. the “active region” having light-emitting elements 130 having “sub-pixels… arranged in a matrix form to display an image”), and a non-display area (see e.g. Fig. 1 and associated text; in Fig. 1, the display is shown in top view, having an area with pads for providing various signals, which is a “non-display” area since light is not emitted from this area); an auxiliary line (e.g. “first low potential power line 162”) on the substrate between the plurality of sub-pixels; an auxiliary line connection part (e.g. a combination of “second low potential power line 164” and “auxiliary electrode 168”) connected to the auxiliary line; a passivation layer (e.g. “first bank 146”, which is made of an insulating material that “passivates” and is thus reasonably interpreted as a “passivation layer”) on the auxiliary line connection part, the passivation layer configured to expose a part of the auxiliary line connection part in a contact area (see e.g. Fig. 4I); an interlayer insulation layer (e.g. “passivation layer 118”, which is between various layers – and thus “interlayer” – and is made of an insulating material, so it is reasonably interpreted as an “interlayer insulating layer”) between the auxiliary line and the passivation layer; a planarization layer (e.g. “second bank 148”, which is a layer across the device that has a planar top surface, and is thus reasonably interpreted as a “planarization layer”) on the passivation layer, the planarization layer having an end that further protrudes toward the contact area than an end of the passivation layer (see Fig. 4I, wherein in “undercut region UC” there is a void where nothing, including layer 134, is not formed); and a plurality of organic light-emitting elements (e.g. “light emitting element 130” comprising “organic light emitting layer 134”) on the planarization layer and on the plurality of sub-pixels, wherein the auxiliary line connection part comprises: a first auxiliary line connection part (e.g. 164) below the interlayer insulation layer, the first auxiliary line connection part connected to the auxiliary line; and a second auxiliary line connection part (e.g. 168) between the interlayer insulation layer and the passivation layer, the second auxiliary line connection part connected to the first auxiliary line connection part, wherein a cathode electrode (e.g. “cathode electrode 136”) of each of the plurality of organic light-emitting elements is in contact with the auxiliary line connection part in the contact area. 2. The organic light-emitting display device of claim 1, further comprising: a dummy organic layer (see portion of 134 that is formed directly on 168 in the hole 138b in the process of forming 134, see e.g. Figs. 3B, 4A, and 4I) on the auxiliary line connection part, wherein the dummy organic layer is spaced apart from an organic layer of each of the plurality of organic light-emitting elements (see e.g. Figs. 3B, 4A, and 4I). 11. The organic light-emitting display device of claim 1, further comprising: a buffer layer (e.g. “interlayer insulating layer 116” which is insulating and thus “buffering”, so is reasonably interpreted as a “buffer layer”) on the substrate, wherein the auxiliary line is between the substrate and the buffer layer, and wherein the first auxiliary line connection part is between the buffer layer and the interlayer insulation layer (see e.g. Fig. 4I). 13. The organic light-emitting display device of claim 11, wherein the plurality of sub-pixels comprise a first sub-pixel and a second sub-pixel, and the auxiliary line and the auxiliary line connection part are between the first sub-pixel and the second sub-pixel (see e.g. the “active region” having light-emitting elements 130 having “sub-pixels… arranged in a matrix form to display an image” along with Figs. 1 and 4I). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 10-2018-0013225 (“LG”) (see 4/19/24 IDS and applicant-submitted NPL copy) (also see machine-generated translation provided by the office with this action). Re claim 3, LG teaches and/or would have suggested as obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention: the organic light-emitting display device of claim 2 (see above), wherein in the contact area, the cathode electrode is in contact with the dummy organic layer, the auxiliary line connection part, a side surface of the passivation layer, and a bottom surface of the planarization layer that protrudes further than the passivation layer (see e.g. Fig. 4I, wherein 136 fills the hole 138b and parts of the undercut region UC, see “On the other hand, the cathode electrode 136, which is formed by diffracting in the vertical, horizontal, and inclined directions, has better step coverage than the organic light emitting layer 134 and is also formed in the undercut UC region.” While in Fig. 4I it is not shown on the bottom of 148, the drawing is rather schematic, and one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize from the teachings herein and from knowledge in the prior art that in real devices, the UC region shown in Fig. 4I would not have such straight lines and perfect angles, and that 136 may certainly contact the bottom surface of 148 in the region UC). It has been established that “the [obviousness] analysis need not seek out precise teachings directed to the specific subject matter of the challenged claim” because the Office or “a court can take account of the inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would employ.” KSR Int’ Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 418 (2007). It is also well settled that a reference stands for all of the specific teachings thereof as well as the inferences one of ordinary skill in the art would have reasonably been expected to draw therefrom. See In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1264-65 (Fed. Cir. 1992). Furthermore, Applicant has not disclosed that the claimed shape (the cathode touching the bottom surface of the passivation layer) is for a particular unobvious purpose, produces an unexpected result, or is otherwise critical. It has been found that mere changes in the shape of an object, lacking any convincing proof of criticality or unobviousness thereof, is not sufficient for patentability. See MPEP 2144.04(IV)(B), In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). To overcome a prima facie case of obviousness, Applicant must show factual evidence that the particular range is critical or achieves unexpected results relative to the prior art range. Claim(s) 4 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art does not explicitly teach, or reasonably suggest as obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, an invention having all of the limitations of claim 4, including: a bank comprising an inorganic material, the bank configured to cover the planarization layer and an end of an anode electrode of each of the plurality of organic light-emitting elements, wherein an end of the planarization layer protrudes further than an end of the bank in the contact area. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record, because it is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, but which is not relied upon specifically in the rejections above, is listed on the Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Parendo who can be contacted by phone at (571) 270-5030 or by direct fax at (571) 270-6030. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 9 am to 4 pm ET. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Billy Kraig, can be reached at (571) 272-8660. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Parendo/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598876
BENDABLE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598918
MAGNETO-RESISTIVE ELEMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE MAGNETO-RESISTIVE ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598734
METHOD OF MAKING 3D MEMORY STACKING FORMATION WITH HIGH CIRCUIT DENSITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575231
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE ARRAY CONTAINING METAMATERIAL LIGHT COLLIMATING FEATURES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573458
METHOD FOR FORMING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE WITH WAVE SHAPED ERASE GATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 742 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month