Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/489,729

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A DEVICE COMPRISING TWO SEMICONDUCTOR DICE AND A DEVICE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Priority
Oct 31, 2022 — IT 102022000022395
Examiner
MALEK, MALIHEH
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
477 granted / 602 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
85.2%
+45.2% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 602 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant elected Group II, claims 12-20, without traverse and first device species directed to Fig. 17 with traverse. Claims 1-11 have been canceled and new claims 21-31 have been added. Currently, claims 12-31 are pending. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the species restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.03(a)). DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Allegato et al. (Pub. No. US 2015/0115378 A1, herein Allegato). Regarding claim 12, Allegato discloses a device, comprising: a first die 34 of semiconductor integrating electronic components (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraph [0018]); a second die 36/38 of semiconductor bonded to the first die and forming patterned structures (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraph [0023]), the first die having a main surface; internal electrical coupling structures 44/50 electrically coupling the main surface of the first die to the second die (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0020]-[0023]); and external connection regions 46/46 on the main surface of the first die; and a package 94/96 packaging on the main surface of the first die (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0021], [0035]). Regarding claim 13, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 12, wherein the package entirely covers the main surface of the first die (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0009], [0035]). Regarding claim 14, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 12, further comprising a bonding layer 54 superimposed on the main surface of the first die (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraph [0023]). Regarding claim 15, Allegato inherently discloses the device according to claim 14, wherein the bonding layer has through openings and the external connection regions traverse the through openings (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0021], [0069]; “It is possible to apply the present manufacturing method also to packages of a different type, such as for example packages of a ball grid array (BGA), quad-flat no-leads (QFN), or chip-scale (CSP) type.” A BGA with this structure uses a bonding layer that has vertical openings or vias, while conductive external connection regions are routed laterally across that layer, sometimes intersecting or connecting through those openings to efficiently link the chip to the solder ball array.). Regarding claim 16, Allegato discloses a MEMS device, comprising: a first die 34 that includes: a main surface; a body 40 and a passivation layer 42 on the body (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0018]-[0020]); a second die 38 having a first semiconductor layer 62 and an anchoring region 70 on the first semiconductor layer, the second die bonded to the first die by a bonding region and forming patterned structures (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0018]-[0019], [0026]-[0029]); a first contact pad 46 and a second contact pad 48 on the passivation layer (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0021]-[0022]); a fixed portion on the first semiconductor layer opposite to the anchoring region (the layer underneath pad 76); and a third contact pad 76 on the fixed portion (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraph [0031]). Regarding claims 17-18, Allegato discloses the MEMS device of claim 16, further comprising a first recess 72, a second recess, and a third recess, further comprising a through opening that incorporates a part of the third recess (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0030], [0045]). This limitation appears to be a product-by-process limitation that does not structurally distinguish the claimed invention over the prior art. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is taught by the reference even though the prior product was made by a different process. In re Thorpe, 227 USPQ 964, 966. Regarding claim 19, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 16, wherein the passivation layer includes embedded metallizations 44 (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0010], [0020], [0022]). Regarding claim 20, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 16 further comprising external connection regions 80 on the first contact pads, the external connection regions protruding partially from the device (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraph [0031]). Regarding claim 21, Allegato discloses a device, comprising: a first die 34 including: a semiconductor body 40; and a passivation layer 42 on the body (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0018]-[0020]); a second die 38 including: a first semiconductor layer 62; and a first anchoring region 70 on the first semiconductor layer; a first bonding region coupled between the semiconductor body and the first anchoring region (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0018]-[0019], [0026]-[0029]); a first contact pad 46 on the passivation layer; a fixed portion on the first semiconductor layer; and a second contact pad 76 on the fixed portion (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0021]-[0022], [0031]; The layer underneath pad 76 is the fixed portion.). Regarding claim 22, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, wherein the semiconductor body includes a plurality of electronic components (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0022], [0031]). Regarding claim 23, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, wherein the passivation layer includes a plurality of metallizations 44 forming a redistribution layer (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0020], [0022]). Regarding claim 24, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, wherein the second die further includes: a second anchoring region on the first semiconductor layer; and a plurality of suspended structures between the first and second anchoring region (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0026]-[0029]). Regarding claim 25, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, wherein the first and second contact pads are coupled together with a bonding wire (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0021]-[0022]). Regarding claim 26, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, further comprising a third contact pad 48 on the passivation layer (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0021]-[0022]). Regarding claim 27, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 26, further comprising a metal bump on the third contact pad (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraph [0069]). Regarding claim 28, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, wherein the first anchoring region includes: a dielectric region on the first semiconductor layer; a second semiconductor layer on the dielectric region; and a second bonding region on the second semiconductor layer (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0027]-[0029]). Regarding claim 29, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 21, wherein the fixed portion includes: a dielectric region on the first semiconductor layer; a second semiconductor layer on the dielectric region; and the second contact pad 76 on the second semiconductor layer (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0027]-[0029], [0031]). Regarding claim 30, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 24, wherein the first die includes a first cavity 72 in a face of the semiconductor body opposite the passivation layer (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0019]-[0020]). Regarding claim 31, Allegato discloses the device according to claim 30, wherein the plurality of suspended structures of the second die is aligned with the first cavity in the first die (Allegato: Fig. 2 and paragraphs [0019]-[0020], [0026]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALIHEH MALEK whose telephone number is (571)270-1874. The examiner can normally be reached M/T/W/R/F, 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B Gauthier can be reached on (571)270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. April 2, 2026 /MALIHEH MALEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666682
VERTICAL TRANSPORT TRANSISTOR DEVICES WITH BACK SIDE INTERCONNECTS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666654
A GRAPHENE-BASED BIOSENSOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666643
METHOD TO IMPLANT P-TYPE AND/OR N-TYPE RINGS IN A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666714
METHODS RELATED TO RADIO-FREQUENCY SWITCHING DEVICES HAVING IMPROVED VOLTAGE HANDLING CAPABILITY
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652847
FLASH MEMORY AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+3.6%)
2y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 602 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month