Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/493,128

HOLDING JIG, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF HOLDING JIG, AND GRINDING METHOD OF WORKPIECE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 24, 2023
Examiner
SEABE, JUSTIN D
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Disco Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
555 granted / 777 resolved
+1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
802
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 777 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kajiyama (JP 2004356357). Regarding claim 1, Kajiyama discloses a holding jig (33) that has a plate shape (Figure 3) and is interposed between a workpiece (such as a semiconductor wafer) and a chuck table (31) when the workpiece is held by the chuck table, the holding jig comprising: a first surface (33a); a second surface (33b) on an opposite side of the first surface; and an outer circumferential surface (see Figure 3, outer circumferential surface of plate shape) that connects the first surface and the second surface, wherein an altered layer that reaches a central region of the second surface from a central region of the first surface is formed (the grooves and holes formed by 331, 332, 333 are considered to be “altering” the layer that is between the respective surfaces, and thereby the altered layer reaches a central layer of each surface). Regarding claim 3, Kajiyama discloses the holding jig according to claim 1 above. Kajiyama further discloses the altered layer has a part formed into a straight line shape along the first surface (Figure 3, see straight lines). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 4, and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kajiyama (JP 2004356357) in view of Yamashita (JP 2019111634). Regarding claims 2 and 4; Kajiyama discloses a holding jig (33) that has a plate shape (Figure 3) and is interposed between a workpiece (such as a semiconductor wafer) and a chuck table (31) when the workpiece is held by the chuck table, the holding jig comprising: a first surface (33a); a second surface (33b) on an opposite side of the first surface; and an outer circumferential surface (see Figure 3, outer circumferential surface of plate shape) that connects the first surface and the second surface, wherein an altered layer that reaches a central region of the second surface from a central region of the first surface is formed (the grooves and holes formed by 331, 332, 333 are considered to be “altering” the layer that is between the respective surfaces, and thereby the altered layer reaches a central layer of each surface). Additionally, the material of the holding jig is constructed of similar materials (“a semiconductor wafer formed of silicon or a compound semiconductor wafer, a silicon carbide substrate, a lithium tantalate substrate, a quartz substrate, etc.” and “the workpiece holding plate 33 is formed of a circular silicon plate”). Kajiyama further discloses the altered layer has a part formed into a straight line shape along the first surface (Figure 3, see straight lines). Although Kajiyama discloses similar materials for the workpiece and the holding jig, Kajiyama does not explicitly disclose that they are the same material in the embodiment; additionally, Kajiyama fails to teach the grinding unit including a grinding wheel with a circular plate shape and a grinding feed unit that causes the chuck table and grinding unit to relatively approach or separate from each other. Yamashita teaches a grinding/polishing apparatus for semiconductor wafers including a chuck table (Figure 1), a grinding unit including a grinding wheel (313) with a circular plate/annular shape (see Figure 1), a grinding feed unit (35, 36) that causes the chuck table and the grinding unit to relatively approach or separate from each other (Figures 2 and 4 showing how the grinding unit and table separate/approach). Yamashita further teaches a holding jig (B) that it interposed between the workpiece (W) and the chuck table, the holding jig and the workpiece formed of the same materials (see abstract). Because Kajiyama is directed to a workpiece and holding jig arrangement for semiconductors, and because Yamashita teaches a workpiece and holding jig arrangement for semiconductors, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the holding jig such that it is formed of the same material as the main component of the workpiece and the grinding unit including a griding wheel with a circular plate shape and a grinding feed unit that causes the chuck table and grinding unit to relatively approach or separate from each other as taught by Yamashita for the purposes of reducing defects in the workpiece. Regarding claim 6; Kajiyama discloses a method for constructing a workpiece with a holding jig that has a plate shape (Figure 3) and is interposed between a workpiece (11) with a circular plate shape (Figure 5) and a chuck table (3) when the workpiece is held by the chuck table. The apparatus comprises the chuck table, a cutting unit (4) including a spindle (41). Additionally, workpieces must be “fed” (see “feed direction”). Kajiyama further discloses the holding jig (33) that has a plate shape (Figure 3) and is interposed between a workpiece (such as a semiconductor wafer) and a chuck table (31) when the workpiece is held by the chuck table, the holding jig comprising: a first surface (33a); a second surface (33b) on an opposite side of the first surface; and an outer circumferential surface (see Figure 3, outer circumferential surface of plate shape) that connects the first surface and the second surface, wherein an altered layer that reaches a central region of the second surface from a central region of the first surface is formed (the grooves and holes formed by 331, 332, 333 are considered to be “altering” the layer that is between the respective surfaces, and thereby the altered layer reaches a central layer of each surface). Additionally, the material of the holding jig is constructed of similar materials (“a semiconductor wafer formed of silicon or a compound semiconductor wafer, a silicon carbide substrate, a lithium tantalate substrate, a quartz substrate, etc.” and “the workpiece holding plate 33 is formed of a circular silicon plate”). Kajiyama further discloses the altered layer has a part formed into a straight line shape along the first surface (Figure 3, see straight lines). Although Kajiyama discloses similar materials for the workpiece and the holding jig, Kajiyama does not explicitly disclose that they are the same material in the embodiment; additionally, Kajiyama fails to teach the grinding unit including a griding wheel with a circular plate shape and a grinding feed unit that causes the chuck table and grinding unit to relatively approach or separate from each other. As such, Kajiyama fails to teach a jig support step of supporting the holding jig by the chuck table by bringing a side of the second surface of the holding jig into contact with the chuck table; a workpiece holding step of sucking and holding the workpiece by the chuck table by placing the workpiece on the first surface of the holding jig and sucking the workpiece by the chuck table through the holding jig; and a workpiece grinding step of grinding the workpiece held by the chuck table with interposition of the holding jig by the grinding wheel through starting rotation of the chuck table around a table rotation axis and rotation of the grinding wheel around a wheel rotation axis and starting grinding feed in which the chuck table and the grinding unit move to relatively approach each other by actuation of the grinding feed unit. Yamashita teaches a grinding/polishing apparatus for semiconductor wafers including a chuck table (Figure 1), a grinding unit including a grinding wheel (313) with a circular plate/annular shape (see Figure 1), a grinding feed unit (35, 36) that causes the chuck table and the grinding unit to relatively approach or separate from each other (Figures 2 and 4 showing how the grinding unit and table separate/approach). Yamashita further teaches a holding jig (B) that it interposed between the workpiece (W) and the chuck table, the holding jig and the workpiece formed of the same materials (see abstract). Yamashita then teaches a jig support step of supporting the holding jig by the chuck table by bringing a side of the second surface of the holding jig into contact with the chuck table (see Figure 2 which has B in contact with the chuck table); a workpiece holding step of sucking and holding the workpiece by the chuck table by placing the workpiece on the first surface of the holding jig and sucking the workpiece by the chuck table through the holding jig (“the workpiece W sucked and held”); and a workpiece grinding step of grinding the workpiece held by the chuck table with interposition of the holding jig by the grinding wheel through starting rotation of the chuck table around a table rotation axis and rotation of the grinding wheel around a wheel rotation axis and starting grinding feed in which the chuck table and the grinding unit move to relatively approach each other by actuation of the grinding feed unit (see the movement mechanisms 370, 371 which rotate the table and 310 which rotates the grinding wheel with grinding feed unit 35). Because Kajiyama is directed to a workpiece and holding jig arrangement for semiconductors, and because Yamashita teaches a workpiece and holding jig arrangement for semiconductors, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the holding jig such that it is formed of the same material as the main component of the workpiece and the grinding unit including a grinding wheel with a circular plate shape and a grinding feed unit that causes the chuck table and grinding unit to relatively approach or separate from each other, such that a jig support step of supporting the holding jig by the chuck table by bringing a side of the second surface of the holding jig into contact with the chuck table; a workpiece holding step of sucking and holding the workpiece by the chuck table by placing the workpiece on the first surface of the holding jig and sucking the workpiece by the chuck table through the holding jig; and a workpiece grinding step of grinding the workpiece held by the chuck table with interposition of the holding jig by the grinding wheel through starting rotation of the chuck table around a table rotation axis and rotation of the grinding wheel around a wheel rotation axis and starting grinding feed in which the chuck table and the grinding unit move to relatively approach each other by actuation of the grinding feed unit as taught by Yamashita for the purposes of reducing defects in the workpiece. Regarding claim 7; Kajiyama in view of Yamashita teaches the grinding method according to claim 6 above. Kajiyama fails to teach a jig grinding step of grinding the holding jig by the grinding wheel after the jig support step but before the workpiece holding step. Yamashita further teaches a jig grinding step of grinding the holding jig by the grinding wheel (Figure 2), and this step occurs after the jig support step (as the holding jig is arranged on the chuck table) and before the workpiece holding step (Figure 4 occurs later). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Kajiyama such that a jig grinding step of grinding the holding jig by the grinding wheel after the jig support step but before the workpiece holding step as taught by Yamashita for the purposes of reducing damage/defects through enhanced adhesion (smooth surface) and prevention of contamination. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kajiyama (JP 2004356357) in view of Hata (JP 2017028157). Kajiyama discloses a manufacturing method for a holding jig (33) that has a plate shape (Figure 3) and is interposed between a workpiece (such as a semiconductor wafer) and a chuck table (31) when the workpiece is held by the chuck table, the holding jig comprising: a first surface (33a); a second surface (33b) on an opposite side of the first surface; and an outer circumferential surface (see Figure 3, outer circumferential surface of plate shape) that connects the first surface and the second surface, wherein an altered layer that reaches a central region of the second surface from a central region of the first surface is formed (the grooves and holes formed by 331, 332, 333 are considered to be “altering” the layer that is between the respective surfaces, and thereby the altered layer reaches a central layer of each surface). Additionally, the material of the holding jig is constructed of similar materials (“a semiconductor wafer formed of silicon or a compound semiconductor wafer, a silicon carbide substrate, a lithium tantalate substrate, a quartz substrate, etc.” and “the workpiece holding plate 33 is formed of a circular silicon plate”). Kajiyama further discloses the altered layer has a part formed into a straight line shape along the first surface (Figure 3, see straight lines). Kajiyama fails to teach a preparation step of preparing a substrate and a laser processing step of manufacturing the holding jig by focusing a laser beam having a wavelength component transmitted through the substrate on the substrate and forming the altered layer in the substrate. Hata teaches a method of manufacturing a holding jig (1, 4) formed of a substrate (1) that includes a preparation step (Figure 2A) and a laser processing step of manufacturing the holding jig by focusing a laser beam having a wavelength component transmitted through the substrate forming the altered layer (formations 11 within the substrate are cut with a cutting device; Hata then teaches “FIG. 5 is a perspective view schematically showing a configuration example of a cutting device (processing device) using the chuck table 23 according to the present embodiment. Note that the chuck table 23 according to the present embodiment can also be used in other processing apparatuses such as a laser processing apparatus”. It is then known from the prior art that the preparation and processing of a substrate for a holding device of a chuck table can be processed through a laser step instead of a cutting device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Kajiyama such that the holding jig altered layer is formed by a laser and a preparation step of preparing a substrate and a laser processing step of manufacturing the holding jig by focusing a laser beam having a wavelength component transmitted through the substrate on the substrate and forming the altered layer in the substrate as taught by Hata for the purposes of greater precision and minimal damage (less chipping/cracking). Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sekiya (JP 2015229206) teaches a holding jig (10) formed with alterations (14) with a wafer (11) placed overtop. Nakamura (US 8167687) teaches a holding plate (1) which is formed with a two surfaces (3, 4) and the holding plate includes alterations (10). Nakamura (US 11583962) teaches a holding plate (1) formed with alterations (3, 5) by laser. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN D SEABE whose telephone number is (571)272-4961. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at 571-272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN D SEABE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601302
TURBOMACHINE COMPRISING A SPEED REDUCER HAVING ATTACHMENT FLANGES COUPLED BY A GEAR COUPLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601359
SIDE CHANNEL COMPRESSOR HAVING A SEAL ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589859
DEVICE FOR ASSISTING WITH REGULATION OF PROPELLERS OF AERONAUTICAL TURBOMACHINERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590571
BEARING FOR A WIND TURBINE, METHOD FOR MONITORING AN ANOMALY IN A BEARING OF A WIND TURBINE, SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AN ANOMALY IN A BEARING OF A WIND TURBINE AND WIND TURBINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584457
WIND TURBINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+24.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 777 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month