Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/493,219

FORMING A PAVED SURFACE WITH AN EMBEDDED TUBULAR BODY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 24, 2023
Priority
Oct 24, 2022 — provisional 63/380,624
Examiner
YAO, THEODORE N
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Traxyl Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
196 granted / 292 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
345
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 292 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, claims 1-10, in the reply filed on 5/6/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pino (US 20180156357 A1). Regarding claim 1, Pino teaches a method of building a surface comprising an embedded tubular body, the method comprising: applying a first layer of a first material (Fig 4, material 212, see further details in dependent claims) to a first surface (Fig 4, applied to surface/ground removed from 12); and applying a tubular body at one of: a top surface of the first layer (note the other alternative is taught), within the first layer (Fig 4, conduit 140 applied within the first layer/material, Abstract, conduit is buried), and a top surface of the first surface (note the other alternative is taught). Regarding claim 2, Pino teaches wherein the first material comprises gravel (Para 0053, material 212 may include, “conventional gravel aggregate”) and the first surface comprises earth (Para 0044, first surface includes ground including soil/earth). Regarding claim 3, Pino teaches wherein the first material comprises asphalt (Para 0055, material 212 includes asphalt mixtures) and the first surface comprises a gravel layer or an asphalt layer (Para 0044, first surface includes ground including asphalt). Regarding claim 4, Pino teaches wherein the first material comprises concrete (Para 0055, material 212 includes concrete mixtures) and the first surface comprises a gravel layer (Para 0044, first surface includes ground including materials construable as gravel). Regarding claim 5, Pino teaches wherein applying a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface comprises: applying the tubular body onto the top surface of the first surface using an apparatus that moves along the top surface of the first surface while the tubular body is being applied along the top surface of the first surface, the tubular body possessing a. bottom face and a top face, the bottom face contacting the top surface of the first surface and the top face being above the top surface of the first surface (please note under the broadest reasonably interpretation of this claim, the examiner understands that this claim further limiting the alternatives of a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface. In this case, in the parent claim, the alternative of placement “within the first layer” which need not occur with the steps recited in this claim). Regarding claim 6, Pino teaches wherein applying a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface comprises: applying the tubular body onto the top surface of the first layer using an apparatus that moves along the top surface of the first layer while the tubular body is being applied along the top surface of the first layer, the tubular body possessing a bottom face and a top face, the bottom face contacting the top surface of the first layer and the top face being above the top surface of the first layer (please note under the broadest reasonably interpretation of this claim, the examiner understands that this claim further limiting the alternatives of a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface. In this case, in the parent claim, the alternative of placement “within the first layer” which need not occur with the steps recited in this claim). Regarding claim 7, Pino teaches further comprising: in response applying the tubular body onto the top surface of the first layer, compacting the first layer (please note under the broadest reasonably interpretation of this claim, the examiner understands that this claim further limiting the alternatives of a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface. In this case, in the parent claim, the alternative of placement “within the first layer” which need not occur with the steps recited in this claim). Regarding claim 8, Pino teaches further comprising using the apparatus to compact the first layer (please note under the broadest reasonably interpretation of this claim, the examiner understands that this claim further limiting the alternatives of a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface. In this case, in the parent claim, the alternative of placement “within the first layer” which need not occur with the steps recited in this claim). Regarding claim 9, Pino teaches wherein applying a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface comprises unspooling a tubular body spool (please note under the broadest reasonably interpretation of this claim, the examiner understands that this claim further limiting the alternatives of a tubular body at a top surface of one of the first layer and the first surface. In this case, in the parent claim, the alternative of placement “within the first layer” which need not occur with the steps recited in this claim). . Regarding claim 10, Pino teaches further comprising: removing a second surface to reveal the first surface underneath (Fig 4, Para 0002, trench is cut/dig to reveal the first surface by cutting ground/spoil 12). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Allouche (US 20140270971 A1) teaches creating a channel in the ground surface, placing one or more lines in the channel, and placing a capping material in the channel, thereby encapsulating the lines. Gorman (US 20190271121 A1) teaches a distributed premixed SAMI material may include a mixture and/or combination of binding material and pre-cut fiber material. The machine may also include a channel positioned adjacent and downstream of the premixed SAMI material distribution component. Finzel (US 6866448 B2) teaches an optical cable, in the form of a microcable or minicable (1), in solid ground (17) with the aid of a laying unit (23). The microcable or minicable (1) used for this purpose comprises a tube. Finzel (WO 2004027953 A1) teaches an arrangement (8), in one application form, is applied on the surface of the base layer (1) with alternating laying direction along the longitudinal direction of laying and then the cover layer (11) is applied such that the arrangement is embedded in the cover layer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THEODORE N YAO whose telephone number is (571)272-8745. The examiner can normally be reached typically 8am-4pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TARA SCHIMPF can be reached at (571) 270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THEODORE N YAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692750
BEARING ASSEMBLY WITH FLOW RESTRICTOR FOR A DUAL ROD DIRECTIONAL DRILLING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680385
TORQUE-ADAPTIVE IMPACT TOOL SUITABLE FOR PDC BIT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674371
DOWNHOLE SETTING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A WELLBORE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668936
Type III Traffic Barricade
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662898
LATERAL LINER INCLUDING A VALVED WIPER PLUG ASSEMBLY
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.2%)
2y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 292 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month