Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Traxyl Inc. is currently addressing 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and the same number of distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's active filings are being handled by different technical groups. This structure allows for a variety of perspectives to influence the portfolio's progress.
Andrish, Sean D is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. With 2 pending actions and two distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for one action. This arrangement requires the company to monitor the specific prosecution tendencies of two different examiners across two separate art units. Practitioners should monitor the distinct approaches of these examiners to identify any variations in prosecution style across the different technical groups.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDRISH, SEAN D | 1 | 71.5% | +32.1% |
| YAO, THEODORE N | 1 | 66.9% | +39.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18591715 | RECYCLING DEBRIS WHILE DEPLOYING A TUBULAR BODY | ANDRISH, SEAN D | 11d overdue |
| 18493219 | FORMING A PAVED SURFACE WITH AN EMBEDDED TUBULAR BODY | YAO, THEODORE N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3678 | 1 |
| 3676 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18591715 | RECYCLING DEBRIS WHILE DEPLOYING A TUBULAR BODY | ANDRISH, SEAN D | 3678 | §103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Feb 29, 2024 |
| 18493219 | FORMING A PAVED SURFACE WITH AN EMBEDDED TUBULAR BODY | YAO, THEODORE N | 3676 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial