Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/494,156

IMAGE SENSOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2023
Priority
Dec 09, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0171885
Examiner
DINKE, BITEW A
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
558 granted / 768 resolved
+4.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
809
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
91.6%
+51.6% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 768 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-19 and 21 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The primary reason for the allowance of the claim is the inclusion of the limitation “a first connection line connecting the source region of the source follower transistor to the first pickup dopant region” as recited in independent claim 10, in all of the claims which is not found in the prior art references. Claims 11-19 are allowed for the same reasons as claim 10, from which they depend. The primary reason for the allowance of the claim is the inclusion of the limitation “a first connection line electrically connecting a source terminal of the source follower transistor to the first pickup dopant region” as recited in independent claim 21, in all of the claims which is not found in the prior art references. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The primary reason for the allowance of the claims is the inclusion of the limitation, along with the other claimed features, “a first pickup dopant region in the first well region; and a first connection line electrically connecting the source terminal of the source follower transistor to the first pickup dopant region”, as recited in claim 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4- 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wan et al. (U.S. 2014/0042299 A1, hereinafter refer to Wan) in view of Gocho et al. (U.S. 2021/0400224 A1, hereinafter refer to Gocho). Regarding Claim 1: Wan discloses an image sensor (see Wan, Figs.10-11 as shown below and ¶ [0011]) comprising: PNG media_image1.png 444 681 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 306 489 media_image2.png Greyscale a photoelectric conversion element (24) in a first semiconductor substrate (26) (see Wan, Fig.10 as shown above); a second semiconductor substrate (120) on the first semiconductor substrate (26) (see Wan, Fig.10 as shown above); a source follower transistor (128) on the second semiconductor substrate (120) (see Wan, Figs.10-11 as shown above); and a through-plug (146) penetrating the second semiconductor substrate (120), the through-plug (146) electrically connecting the photoelectric conversion element (24) to the source follower transistor (128) (see Wan, Figs.10-11 as shown above and ¶ [0040]- ¶ [0041]), wherein a source terminal of the source follower transistor (128) is electrically connected to the second semiconductor substrate (120) (see Wan, Figs.10-11 as shown above). Wan is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein the second semiconductor substrate including a first well region having a first conductivity type; a source follower transistor on the first well region of the second semiconductor substrate; an isolation structure in the second semiconductor substrate, the isolation structure surrounding the first well region when viewed in a plan view. For support see Gocho, which teaches wherein the second semiconductor substrate (300) including a first well region (301) having a first conductivity type (see Gocho, Figs.45, 51, 52, and 53 as shown below and ¶ [0332]); a source follower transistor (104) on the first well region (301) of the second semiconductor substrate (300) (see Gocho, Figs.45, 51, 52, and 53 as shown below, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]); an isolation structure (STI) in the second semiconductor substrate (300), the isolation structure (STI) surrounding the first well region when viewed in a plan view (see Gocho, Figs.52-53 as shown below, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]). PNG media_image3.png 847 617 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 519 791 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 444 649 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 758 722 media_image6.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Wan and Gocho to enable the second semiconductor substrate to include a first well region having a first conductivity type; a source follower transistor to be formed on the first well region of the second semiconductor substrate and an isolation structure in the second semiconductor substrate, the isolation structure to surround the first well region when viewed in a plan view as taught by Gocho in order to individually control the respective threshold voltages of the selection transistor, the reset transistor, and the amplification transistor and to turn on amplification transistor at a desired voltage value and amplify the electrical signal from the photoelectric conversion element. Regarding Claim 2: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein the second semiconductor substrate (300) further comprises a second well region (301) separated from the first well region (301) by the isolation structure (STI) (see Gocho, Figs.52-53 as shown above, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]). Regarding Claim 4: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 2 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein a second connection line (138) electrically connecting a gate terminal of the source follower transistor (128) to the through-plug (146) (see Wan, Fig.10 as shown above and Fig.9). Regarding Claim 5: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 2 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein a reset transistor on the second well region (301) of the second semiconductor substrate (300) (see Gocho, Figs.52-53 as shown above, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]); and a second pickup dopant region (321) in the second well region (301) (see Gocho, Figs.52-53 as shown above, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]). Regarding Claim 6: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 2 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein the first well region (301) is electrically isolated from the second well region (301) (see Gocho, Figs.52-53 as shown above, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]). Regarding Claim 7: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 2 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein the through-plug (Cfd) penetrates the first well region (301) of the second semiconductor substrate (300) (see Gocho, Figs.45, 51, and 52-53 as shown above, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]). Regarding Claim 8: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein a through-insulating pattern (340) penetrating the second semiconductor substrate (300), the through-insulating pattern (340) surrounding a side surface of the through-plug (Cfd) (see Gocho, Figs.45, 51, and 52-53 as shown above, ¶ [0338] - ¶ [0339], ¶ [0349], ¶ [0353]). Regarding Claim 9: Wan as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Wan and Gocho further teaches wherein a floating diffusion region (32) in the first semiconductor substrate (26) (see Wan, Figs.10-11 as shown above); and a transfer gate electrode (30) between the photoelectric conversion element (24) and the floating diffusion region (32), wherein the through-plug (146) is electrically connected to the floating diffusion region (32) (see Wan, Figs.10-11 as shown above). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BITEW A DINKE whose telephone number is (571)272-0534. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 a.m. - 5 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at (571)272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BITEW A DINKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 09, 2026
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666686
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE WITH FLUSH SHALLOW TRENCH ISOLATION AND GATE OXIDE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666843
DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY MODULE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652880
OPTICAL DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12652861
PROTECTION AGAINST ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGES
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12648148
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 768 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month