Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/495,132

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Examiner
RALEIGH, DONALD L
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
1067 granted / 1349 resolved
+11.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1349 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 9-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al (US PG Pub. No. 2021/0193742). Regarding Claim 1, Kim discloses in figure 2::a display device (title) comprising: a first light emitting element diode (LE2/OL/UE2) and a second light emitting diode (LE3/OL/UE3) which are disposed on a first base substrate (110, ¶ [0054]); a bank layer (250, ¶ [0091]) disposed under a second base substrate (210, ¶ [0068]) facing the first base substrate (110) , including a first opening (LA2,¶ [0047) overlapping the first light emitting diode (LE2/OL/UE2) in a plan view and a second opening (LA3¶ [0047]) overlapping the second light emitting diode (LE3/OL/UE3) in a plan view, and having a first part (right ) and a second part (left) a transmitting layer (238a, ¶ [0090]) disposed inside the first opening (LA2) and a first color conversion layer (234c,¶ [0087]) disposed inside the second opening (LA3) , wherein the first part (right side of 250 in LA2) and the second part ( left side) have different thicknesses (the right side is thicker) in a thickness direction of the second base substrate (210) . Regarding Claim 2, Lee discloses in figure 2: wherein a thickness of the first part is greater than a thickness of the second part in the thickness direction (the 250 that is directly above TR2 has a first part on the right that is thicker than the second part on the left side because 240 dips down). Regarding Claim 3, Lee discloses in figure 2: wherein the first part (on the right) is disposed adjacent to the first opening (LA2). Regarding Claim 9, Kim discloses in figure 2: further comprising: a color filter (222/224/226) (¶ [0069]) layer disposed under the second base substrate (210). Regarding Claim 10, Lee discloses in figure 5: further comprising: a low refractive layer (232a, resin, acrylic, 1.5, ¶ [0083]) disposed between the color filter layer (222/224/226) and the bank layer (250). Regarding Claim 11, Lee discloses in figure 5: further comprising: a capping layer (240, ¶ [0073]) disposed between the low refractive layer (232a) and the bank layer (250) (it dips down). Regarding Claim 12, Kim discloses in figure 2: A display device (title) comprising: a first light emitting diode (LE2/OL/UE2), a second light emitting diode (LE3/OL/UE3)), and a third light emitting diode (LE1/OL/UE1) [0054]) which are disposed on a first base substrate (110, ¶ [0054]); a bank layer (250, ¶ [0091])) disposed under a second base substrate (210,¶ [0068]) ) facing the first base substrate (110), and including a first opening (LA2) overlapping the first light emitting diode (LE2/OL/UE2) in a plan view, a second opening (LA3) overlapping the second light emitting diode LE3/OL/UE3) in a plan view, and a third opening (LA1) overlapping the third light emitting diode ((LE1/OL/UE1) in a plan view; a transmitting layer (238a, ¶ [0090]) disposed inside the first opening (LA2); a first color conversion layer (234c,¶ [0087]) disposed inside the second opening (LA3); and a second color conversion layer (232c, ¶ [0075]) disposed inside the third opening (LA1), wherein a thickness of the bank layer (250) disposed adjacent to the first opening (LA2) and a thickness of the bank layer (250) disposed adjacent to the third opening (LA1) are different from each other in a thickness direction of the second base substrate (210). Regarding Claim 13, Kim discloses in figure 2: wherein the thickness of the bank layer (250) disposed adjacent to the first opening (LA2) is greater than the thickness of the bank layer (250) disposed adjacent to the third opening (LA1). Regarding Claim 14, Kim discloses in figure 2: wherein the transmitting layer (238a) covers a portion of a lower surface of the bank layer (250) disposed adjacent to the first opening (LA2). Regarding Claim 15, Kim discloses in figure 2: wherein the transmitting layer (238a) includes a scatterer (238b, ¶ [0090]). Regarding Claim 16, Kim discloses in figure 2: wherein the scatterer (238b) includes titanium dioxide (TiO2) (¶ [0085]). Regarding Claim 17, Kim discloses in figure 2: wherein the first color conversion layer (234c) includes a first wavelength conversion particle (¶ [0087]), and the second color conversion layer (232c) includes a second wavelength conversion particle (¶ [0076]). Regarding Claim 18, Kim discloses in figure 2: further comprising: a color filter layer (222/224/226) (¶ [0069]) disposed under the second base substrate (210). Regarding Claim 19, Kim discloses in figure 2: further comprising: a low refractive layer (232a, resin, acrylic, 1.5, ¶ [0083]) disposed between the color filter layer (222/224/226) and the bank layer (250). Regarding Claim 20, Kim discloses in figure 2: further comprising: a capping layer (240, ¶ [0073]) disposed between the low refractive layer (232a) and the bank layer (250) (it dips down). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding Claim 4, the references of the Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in Claim 4, and specifically comprising the limitation of “wherein the bank layer further includes a dummy opening, and the second part is disposed adjacent to the dummy opening” including the remaining limitations Regarding Claim 5, the references of the Prior Art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of the limitations as set forth in Claim 5, and specifically comprising the limitation of “wherein the transmitting layer covers the first part and a portion of a lower surface of the second part” including the remaining limitations. Claims 6-8 are allowable, at least, because of their dependencies on claim 5. Examiner Note: The first and second parts border different sub-pixels in Kim. Lee et al (US PG Pub. No. 2021/0005672) listed on PTO-892 form also teaches most of the limitations of the rejected claims in figure 5: CONTACT INFORMATION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONALD L RALEIGH whose telephone number is (571)270-3407. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7AM -3 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R. Greece can be reached at 571-272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DONALD L RALEIGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604640
DISPLAY PANEL, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604632
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604586
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598864
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593595
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1349 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month