Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/497,027

VERTICAL MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Examiner
HARRISTON, WILLIAM A
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
941 granted / 1054 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1073
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1054 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 10/30/2023 has been considered. Drawings The drawings filed on 10/30/2023 are acceptable. Specification The abstract of the disclosure and the specification filed on 10/30/2023 are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Hwang (US 2020/0152654). PNG media_image1.png 526 770 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claims 1, 6 and 7, Hwang (US 2020/0152654) discloses: A vertical memory device, comprising: a lower semiconductor layer (LSP, ¶0048) on a substrate (semiconductor substrate 10, ¶0023) including a first region (CAR, ¶0023) and a second region (CNR, ¶0023); a cell stacked structure (ST, ¶0026) on the lower semiconductor layer, the cell stacked structure including an insulation layer pattern (ILD, ¶0026) and a gate pattern (EL, ¶0026) that are alternately and repeatedly stacked, wherein the cell stacked structure (ST) extends in a first direction parallel to an upper surface of the substrate (10), and wherein an edge portion in the first direction of the cell stacked structure (ST) is disposed in the second region and has a step portion having a step shape (¶0029); an etch stop structure (ES, ¶0032) on an upper surface of each of gate patterns (EL) of the step portion of the cell stacked structure, wherein the etch stop structure (ES) includes a first variable resistance pattern (HL is transition metal oxide Hf02, ¶0130) and a mask pattern (41, ¶0041) that are stacked; a channel structure (CVS, ¶0047) passing through the cell stacked structure (ST) on the first region (CAR), and extending to an inner portion of the lower semiconductor layer (10); an insulating interlayer (55) covering the cell stacked structure; and a contact plug (CPLG, ¶0069) passing through the insulating interlayer (55) and the etch stop structure (ES) in the second region (CNR), wherein the contact plug (CPLG) contacts the upper surface of each of the gate patterns (EL) in the second region (CNR). Regarding claim 9, Hwang further discloses: wherein the etch stop structure (ES) covers a portion of the upper surface of each of the gate patterns (EL) of the step portion of the cell stacked structure (ST). Regarding claim 10, Hwang further discloses: wherein the etch stop structure (ES) is horizontally spaced apart (by pad dielectric 25) from sidewalls of the insulation layer pattern (ILD) and the gate pattern (EL) positioned on the etch stop structure. Regarding claim 18 Hwang discloses: A vertical memory device, comprising: a cell stacked structure (ST) on a substrate (10), wherein the cell stacked structure includes an insulation layer pattern (ILD) and a gate pattern (EL) that are alternately and repeatedly stacked, and wherein the cell stacked structure (ST) extends in a first direction parallel to an upper surface of the substrate, and wherein an edge portion in the first direction of the cell stacked structure is disposed in a second region and has a step portion having a step shape (¶0029); an etch stop structure (ES) on an upper surface of each of gate patterns (EL) of the step portion of the cell stacked structure (ST), wherein the etch stop structure (ES, HL, includes a transition metal oxide, ¶0130); an insulating interlayer (55) covering the cell stacked structure; and a contact plug (CPLG) passing through the insulating interlayer and the etch stop structure, wherein the contact plug contacts the upper surface of each of the gate patterns (EL). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8, 11, 12, 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hwang. Regarding claim 8, Hwang does not disclose “wherein the contact plug (CPLG) has a first portion extending from an upper surface of the insulating interlayer to a bottom surface of the mask pattern of the etch stop structure and a second portion extending from a bottom of the first portion to an upper surface of the gate pattern, and wherein the second portion has a width greater than a width of the first portion”. However, a change in size or shape or both is an unpatentable modification when it results in optimum conditions that differ from the prior art in degree but not in kind. In Re Rose, 220 F.2d 459, 105 USPQ 237, In reDailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47). In the instant case the prior art device would not perform differently if modified to the claimed shape or size. Therefore the claimed limitations are considered met. Regarding claim 11, the prior art does not disclose “wherein the gate pattern includes polysilicon”. However, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the claimed invention was made to select polysilicon as a gate material, since it has been held by the courts that selection of a prior art material on the basis of its suitability for its intended purpose is within the level of ordinary skill. In re Leshing, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960) and Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 65 USPQ 297 (1945). Regarding claim 12, Hwang does not disclose “wherein the mask pattern includes silicon nitride”. However, It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the claimed invention was made to select silicon nitride as a mask pattern material, since it has been held by the courts that selection of a prior art material on the basis of its suitability for its intended purpose is within the level of ordinary skill. In re Leshing, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960) and Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 65 USPQ 297 (1945). Regarding claim 20, Hwang discloses: wherein the contact plug (CPLG) has a first portion that contacts the transition metal oxide (HL) included in the etch stop structure (ES). Hwang does not disclose “wherein the first portion contacting the transition metal oxide of the contact plug has a width greater than a width of a second portion of the contact plug”. However, a change in size or shape or both is an unpatentable modification when it results in optimum conditions that differ from the prior art in degree but not in kind. In Re Rose, 220 F.2d 459, 105 USPQ 237, In reDailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47). In the instant case the prior art device would not perform differently if modified to the claimed shape or size. Therefore the claimed limitations are considered met. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-17 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 13, the prior art does not disclose “a cell variable resistance pattern, that are stacked on a sidewall of the channel hole, and wherein the channel is electrically connected to the lower semiconductor layer” and “wherein the cell variable resistance pattern and the first variable resistance pattern include the same material, and wherein a thickness in a horizontal direction of the cell variable resistance pattern on the sidewall of the channel hole is the same as a thickness in a vertical direction of the first variable resistance pattern on the upper surface of the gate patterns” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Claims 2-5, 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, the prior art does not disclose “wherein the channel structure is in a channel hole passing through the cell stacked structure, and the channel structure includes a gate insulation layer pattern, a channel, a cell variable resistance pattern, a filling insulation pattern, and an upper pad” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Regarding claim 19, the prior art does not disclose “a channel structure passing through the cell stacked structure, and wherein the channel structure includes a cell variable resistance pattern including the transition metal oxide.” In combination with the remaining claimed features. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM A HARRISTON whose telephone number is (571)270-3897. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571 270 7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM A HARRISTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 12, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604721
REVERSE EMBEDDED POWER STRUCTURE FOR GRAPHICAL PROCESSING UNIT CHIPS AND SYSTEM-ON-CHIP DEVICE PACKAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604757
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604734
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGES AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598776
NANOSHEET EPITAXY WITH FULL BOTTOM ISOLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593695
STRUCTURE AND PROCESS FOR WARPAGE REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1054 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month