Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/497,039

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 30, 2023
Examiner
HARRISTON, WILLIAM A
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
941 granted / 1054 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1073
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1054 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 10/30/2023 has been considered. Drawings The drawings filed on 10/30/2023 are acceptable. Specification The abstract of the disclosure and the specification filed on 10/30/2023 are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 8 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Seo (US 2021/0193581). PNG media_image1.png 510 704 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Seo discloses: A semiconductor package (10, ¶0026), comprising: a redistribution layer structure (140, ¶0027); a semiconductor structure (110, ¶0027) on the redistribution layer structure; a printed circuit board (130, ¶0027, ¶0051) on the redistribution layer structure (140) and extending around a side surface of the semiconductor structure 110); a molding material (163, ¶0027) extending around the semiconductor structure on the redistribution layer structure; and a silicon interposer (121, ¶0048 discloses 121 and 111 are the same, ¶0034, ¶0035 disclose 111 and 121 are silicon) on the printed circuit board (130) and the molding material (163). Regarding claim 8, Seo further discloses: wherein the printed circuit (130) board includes an opening, and the semiconductor structure (110) is within the opening. Regarding claim 13, Seo further discloses: wherein the redistribution layer structure (140) includes a plurality of redistribution layer vias (143) , at least a subset of the redistribution layer vias at a level of an uppermost portion of the redistribution layer structure being directly bonded to the semiconductor structure (110). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) s 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo. Regarding claim 14, Seo does not disclose “wherein each redistribution layer via among the plurality of redistribution layer vias has a width, in a horizontal direction parallel to an upper surface of the redistribution layer structure, of an uppermost portion of the redistribution layer via that is smaller than a width of a lowermost portion of the redistribution layer via”. However, a change in size or shape or both is an unpatentable modification when it results in optimum conditions that differ from the prior art in degree but not in kind. In Re Rose, 220 F.2d 459, 105 USPQ 237, In reDailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47). In the instant case the prior art device would not perform differently if modified to the claimed shape or size. Therefore the claimed limitations are considered met. Claim(s) 3-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo in view of Pagalia (US 8,080,445). PNG media_image2.png 286 684 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Seo does not disclose “wherein the silicon interposer includes a plurality of first through silicon vias” in a similar device, however, Pagalia (US 8,080,445) discloses a semiconductor package (160), comprising: a redistribution layer structure (122), a semiconductor structure (124) on the redistribution layer structure, an interconnect (132) on the redistribution layer structure (140) and extending around a side surface of the semiconductor structure 110), a molding material (140) extending around the semiconductor structure (124) on the redistribution layer structure; and a silicon interposer (134, column 7 line 60) on the interconnect (132) and the molding material (140). Pagalia discloses a structure as taught provides improved thermal dissipation (column 8 lines 5-30> Therefore it would have been obvious to one having skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Seo, including providing wherein the silicon interposer includes a plurality of first through silicon vias in order to provide improved thermal dissipation as taught by Pagalia Regarding claim 4, Seo further discloses: wherein the printed circuit board (130) is configured to electrically connect the redistribution layer structure (110) and what would be the plurality of first through silicon vias of Pagalia. Regarding claim 5, the modification of Pagalia further discloses: wherein the silicon interposer includes a heat dissipation structure comprising a plurality of second through silicon vias (136a, 136b, column 8 line 26, figure 3i). Regarding claim 6, the modification of Pagalia further discloses: wherein each of at least a subset of the plurality of second through silicon vias (136a) are electrically insulated. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 7 and 9-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, the prior art does not disclose “2. The semiconductor package of claim 1, wherein a thermal conductivity of the silicon interposer is higher than a thermal conductivity of the redistribution layer structure” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Regarding claim 7, the prior art does not disclose “wherein the printed circuit board includes an embedded trace substrate (ETS)” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Regarding claim 9, the prior art does not disclose “wherein the semiconductor structure includes a three dimensional integrated circuit (3D IC) structure including a first semiconductor die and a second semiconductor die on the first semiconductor die” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Claims 15-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 15, the prior art does not disclose “a conductive adhesive member on the first semiconductor structure” and “a molding material extending around the first semiconductor structure on the redistribution layer structure; a silicon interposer on the conductive adhesive member, the printed circuit board, and the molding material; and a second semiconductor structure on the silicon interposer” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Regarding claim 19, the prior art does not disclose “attaching a printed circuit board including a through opening to a first surface of a silicon interposer” and “attaching a semiconductor structure to the first surface of the silicon interposer and within the through opening with a conductive adhesive member” in combination with the remaining claimed features. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM A HARRISTON whose telephone number is (571)270-3897. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571 270 7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM A HARRISTON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604721
REVERSE EMBEDDED POWER STRUCTURE FOR GRAPHICAL PROCESSING UNIT CHIPS AND SYSTEM-ON-CHIP DEVICE PACKAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604757
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604734
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGES AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598776
NANOSHEET EPITAXY WITH FULL BOTTOM ISOLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593695
STRUCTURE AND PROCESS FOR WARPAGE REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1054 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month