Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/498,409

MODEL FOR TRAINING HIGH SIMULATION COLONOSCOPY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Preclinic Medtech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
397 granted / 758 resolved
-17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-10 are objected to because of the following informalities: These claims should not include element numbers and phrases/words. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 & 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yang (U.S. Patent Number 11,216,948). Referring to claim 1, Yang discloses comprising a colon model (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & physical model) and a polypus model (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & polypus) detachably mounted on the colon model (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39); the colon model is opened and provided with polypus replacing points (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & nodes) for mounting the polypus model (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & polypus), the polypus replacing points are provided on different intestinal segments of the colon model (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & nodes); and the polypus replacing points are provided at a plurality of different positions in a circumferential direction of the colon model (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & nodes). Referring to claim 8, Yang discloses further comprising a decorative snap ring inserted and sleeved in an exposed end of the polypus model, the decorative snap rings all having the same external contour (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & polypus), and a plurality of sizes of slots at the inner side of the decorative snap ring being provided according to the corresponding polypus model and the polypus replacing points (Figs. 10 & 11 & column 26 line 61- column 31 lines 39 & nodes). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 9 & 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 2 teaches colon model comprises a cecum segment, a sigmoid colon segment, and a rectal segment; and the cecum segment, the sigmoid colon segment and the rectal segment are each providing with one polypus replacing point. Claims 3-7, 9 & 10 are rejected due to their dependency on claim 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640054
COMPUTATIONAL IN SILICO MODEL FOR PLACENTAL BARRIER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640058
SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING THORACIC CAGE AND LUMBAR SPINE REGION
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633226
AUTOMATED CUSTOMIZATION VIRTUAL ECOSYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626608
SYSTEM TO DETERMINE A PERSONALIZED LEARNING PATHWAY
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626609
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.9%)
3y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month