Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Preclinic Medtech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. maintains 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit and is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This singular focus suggests that the company's current patent strategy is highly specialized, targeting a specific technical niche within the broader medical and mechanical fields. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit indicates that the current filings do not span multiple regulatory or technical classifications at the patent office. This concentration allows for a dedicated approach to securing intellectual property rights without the complexity of navigating different art unit standards.
KESHA FRISBY is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 pending office action. As the sole examiner currently reviewing the company's applications, the progress of the portfolio is entirely dependent on the individual examination style and requirements of this official. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution strategy can be tailored specifically to the feedback from this examiner without the need to reconcile different approaches across multiple cases. With 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area, the company's immediate intellectual property goals are concentrated on the outcome of this single examination process. This allows for an efficient use of resources in responding to the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRISBY, KESHA | 1 | 52.8% | +23.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18498409 | MODEL FOR TRAINING HIGH SIMULATION COLONOSCOPY | FRISBY, KESHA | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18498409 | MODEL FOR TRAINING HIGH SIMULATION COLONOSCOPY | FRISBY, KESHA | 3715 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | Oct 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial