Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/499,117

INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 31, 2023
Priority
Mar 24, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0039186 +1 more
Examiner
LOPEZ, JORGE ANDRES
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
97%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 97% — above average
97%
Career Allowance Rate
29 granted / 30 resolved
+28.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.3%
+53.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 30 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) or (f), 365(a) or (b), or 386(a) based upon applications filed in the COUNTRY OF KOREA on 03/24/2023 and 04/26/2023. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of “Species A (Claims 1-5,7 and 15-17)” in the reply filed on August 4, 2025, is acknowledged. Claims 6,8-14 and 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1,4,7 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over US 12,166,034 B2; Wu et al.; 12/2024; (“034”). Regarding Claim 1. 034 teaches in Figs. 1A and 1B about an integrated circuit device, comprising: a pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 1A, active regions of item 112 and 114) that extend in a first lateral direction (Fig. 1A, active regions extend in a direction along cross-sectional cut line XX’) on a substrate (Fig. 1B, item 102), wherein the pair of fin-type active regions are collinear with each other in the first lateral direction (Fig. 1A, active regions are collinear along cut line XX’); a first gate line (Fig. 1A, bottom or top item 108) that extends in a second lateral direction (Fig. 1A, items 108 extend in a perpendicular direction to the cut line XX’ in the top-down layout of Fig. 1A) on one of the fin-type active regions (Fig. 1B, items 108 are on the fin-type active regions item 104), wherein the second lateral direction crosses the first lateral direction (Fig. 1A, the direction that gate lines extend crosses the direction that fin-type regions extend); a capping insulating layer (Fig. 1B, item 166) that covers a top surface of the first gate line (Fig. 1B, item 166 covers the top surface of items 108); and a fin isolation insulating portion (Fig. 1A, item 110) that extends in the second lateral direction between the pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 1A, item 110 extends in the second direction between region items 112 and 114), wherein the fin isolation insulating portion passes through the capping insulating layer in a vertical direction (Fig. 1B, item 110 passes through item 166 in a vertical direction) that is perpendicular to a plane defined by the first lateral direction and the second lateral direction (vertical direction of Fig. 1B is perpendicular to the top-down layout plane of Fig. 1B), wherein the fin isolation insulating portion comprises: an isolation insulating plug (Fig. 1B, item 170) that includes a first portion (Fig. 1B, lower portion of item 170 below item 166) and a second portion (Fig. 1B, upper portion of item 170 at the same level as item 166), wherein the first portion is interposed between the pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 1B, first portion of item 170 is interposed between fin-type active regions items 104 of transistor items 152 and 154), and the second portion is integrally connected to the first portion and passes through the capping insulating layer in the vertical direction (Fig. 1B, upper second portion of item 170 is integrally connected to lower first portion of item 170, and second portion passes through item 166 in the vertical direction); and an isolation insulating liner (Fig. 1B, item 172) that surrounds a bottom surface and a sidewall of the isolation insulating plug (Fig. 1B, item 172 surrounds a bottom surface and a side wall of item 170), wherein the isolation insulating liner includes an uppermost portion that is equally distant to the substrate than a top surface of the isolation insulating plug. 636 does not teach about an integrated circuit device, comprising: an isolation insulating liner wherein the isolation insulating liner includes an uppermost portion that is closer to the substrate than a top surf ace of the isolation insulating plug. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to reduce in a vertical direction the coverage of the isolation insulating liner around the isolation insulation plug (especially since the coverage vertical reduction of the isolation insulating liner around the isolation insulating plug only exposes the isolation insulation plug to another insulating layer item 166), since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). See MPEP 2144.04. PNG media_image1.png 771 910 media_image1.png Greyscale Fig. 1A, annotated by Examiner from Wu et al., “034” PNG media_image2.png 567 1010 media_image2.png Greyscale Fig. 1B, annotated by Examiner from Wu et al., “034” Regarding Claim 4. 034 teaches in Fig. 5B about an integrated circuit device, wherein each of the isolation insulating liner and the capping insulating layer comprises one of a silicon nitride film or a silicon carbonitride (SiCN) film (“SiN recap process 402 forms a layer of SiN 502 on the upper outer surfaces of the trench 310”, Col. 9, Ln. 1-3, and “insulating layer 166, such as silicon nitride”, Col. 4, Ln. 61-62), and the isolation insulating plug comprises at least one of a silicon oxide film, a silicon oxynitride (Si ON) film, a silicon oxycarbonitride (SiOCN) film, a SiCN film, a silicon nitride film (“trench 310 is filled with SiN”, Col. 10, Ln. 13-14), or a combination thereof. Regarding Claim 7. 034 teaches in Figs. 1B and 3 about an integrated circuit device, wherein at least one nanosheet disposed on the one selected fin-type active region, wherein the at least one nanosheet is surrounded by the first gate line (Fig. 3, “multi-channels provided by the nanosheet channels in the channel region 303a, 303b of the first GAA transistor device 352 and the second GAA transistor device 354”, Col. 6, Ln. 49-52); a source/drain region disposed on the one selected fin-type active region between the first gate line and the fin isolation insulating portion (Fig. 3, source/drain region items 305b and 305c are disposed between gate line items 308a and 308 respectively, and the isolation insulating portion item 310); and an inter-gate dielectric film that covers the source/drain region (Fig. 1B, items 164 covers items 105), wherein the inter-gate dielectric film is interposed between the first gate line and the fin isolation insulating portion in the first lateral direction (Fig. 1B, items 164 are interposed between gate line items 108 and the isolation insulating portion item 110), wherein the capping insulating layer covers a top surface of the inter-gate dielectric film (Fig. 1B, item 166 covers a top surface of item 164). Regarding Claim 15. 034 teaches in Figs. 1A,1B and 3 about an integrated circuit device, comprising: a pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 1A, active regions of item 112 and 114) that extend in a first lateral direction (Fig. 1A, active regions extend in a direction along cross-sectional cut line XX’) on a substrate (Fig. 1B, item 102), wherein the pair of fin-type active regions are collinear with each other in the first lateral direction (Fig. 1A, active regions are collinear along cut line XX’); a fin isolation insulating portion (Fig. 1A, item 110) that extends in a second lateral direction between the pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 1A, item 110 extends in the second direction between region items 112 and 114), wherein the second lateral direction crosses the first lateral direction (see Fig. 1A annotated by Examiner); a pair of nanosheet stacks respectively disposed on the pair of fin-type active regions, wherein each nanosheet stack includes at least one nanosheet line (Fig. 3, “multi-channels provided by the nanosheet channels in the channel region 303a, 303b of the first GAA transistor device 352 and the second GAA transistor device 354”, Col. 6, Ln. 49-52); a first pair of gate lines (Fig. 3, item 308a and 308b) that surround the at least one nanosheet on the pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 3, “multi-channels provided by the nanosheet channels in the channel region 303a, 303b of the first GAA transistor device 352 and the second GAA transistor device 354”, Col. 6, Ln. 49-52), wherein the first pair of gate lines extend in the second lateral direction (see Fig. 1A annotated by Examiner, wherein gate line items 108 extend in the second lateral direction); a capping insulating layer (Fig. 1B, item 166) that covers top surfaces of the first pair of gate lines (Fig. 1B, item 166 covers the top surfaces of the pair of items 108); and a pair of source/drain regions respectively disposed on both sides of the fin isolation insulating portion between the first pair of gate lines (Fig. 1B, items 105 respectively disposed on both sides of item 110 between gate line items 108), wherein the fin isolation insulating portion comprises: an isolation insulating plug (Fig. 1B, item 170) that includes a first portion (Fig. 1B, lower portion of item 170 below item 166) and a second portion (Fig. 1B, upper portion of item 170 at the same level as item 166), wherein the first portion is disposed between the pair of fin-type active regions (Fig. 1B, first portion of item 170 is disposed between fin-type active regions items 104 of transistor items 152 and 154), and the second portion is integrally connected to the first portion and passes through the capping insulating layer in a vertical direction (Fig. 1B, upper second portion of item 170 is integrally connected to lower first portion of item 170, and second portion passes through item 166 in the vertical direction) that is perpendicular to a plane defined by the first lateral direction and the second lateral direction; and an isolation insulating liner (Fig. 1B, item 172) that surrounds a bottom surface and a sidewall of the isolation insulating plug (Fig. 1B, item 172 surrounds a bottom surface and a side wall of item 170), wherein the isolation insulating liner includes an uppermost portion that is equally distant to the substrate than a top surface of the isolation insulating plug. 636 does not teach about an integrated circuit device, comprising: an isolation insulating liner wherein the isolation insulating liner includes an uppermost portion that is closer to the substrate than a top surf ace of the isolation insulating plug. It would have been an obvious matter of design choice to reduce in a vertical direction the coverage of the isolation insulating liner around the isolation insulation plug (especially since the coverage vertical reduction of the isolation insulating liner around the isolation insulating plug only exposes the isolation insulation plug to another insulating layer item 166), since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). See MPEP 2144.04. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3,5 and 16-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, since the prior art does not teach or suggest the claimed limitations. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JORGE ANDRES LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-5763. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (8:30am to 5:00pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fernando Toledo can be reached on 571-272-1867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FERNANDO L TOLEDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897 /JORGE ANDRES LOPEZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684878
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684858
PROCESS INTEGRATION METHOD FOR IMPROVING LEAKAGE IN MV DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12660242
Multigate Device Structure with Stepwise Isolation Features and Method Making the Same
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660538
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE FOR REDUCING DEFECT IN ARRAY REGION
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653065
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE WITH STACKED MEMORY DEVICES
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
97%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+4.5%)
3y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 30 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month