Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/500,714

ULTRAFINE-PITCH ALL-COPPER INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE AND FORMING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 03, 2022 — CN 202211371335.5
Examiner
SLUTSKER, JULIA
Art Unit
2891
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Guangdong University of Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
828 granted / 1076 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1126
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
87.3%
+47.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, and 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN’772 (CN 106205772, cited in IDS, Machine Translation is provided) in view of Yamaguchi (US 2023/0041521), CN’030 (CN 10311030, cited in IDS, Machine Translation is provided), Balucani US 2022/0010449), Hayata (US 2023/0178510), Hartmann (US 2020/0294956), and Maeda (US 2010/0089980). Regarding claims 1 and 8, CN’772 discloses an ultrafine-pitch all-copper interconnect structure, wherein the ultrafine-pitch all-copper interconnect structure is produced a method for forming an ultrafine-pitch all-copper interconnect structure, comprising: step (1) mixing nano-copper particles with a solvent, a dispersant and a viscosity modifier to prepare a nano-copper paste (page 1, paragraph 8; Fig. 1a-1C); selecting a chip and a substrate (3) wherein the chip has copper pillars (Fig.1A), and performing bonding at a preset pressure and a preset temperature under ultrasonication (Embodiment 2; Fig.1C); performing cooling at room temperature to obtain the ultrafine-pitch all-copper interconnect structure (Embodiment 2; Fig.1C) CN’772 does not disclose (1) cleaning a chip and a substrate followed by pretreatment and the pretreatment is acid treatment, plasma treatment, self-assembled monolayer (SAM) or a combination thereof; (2) wherein the chip has 4-500 copper pillars with input/output (I/O) ports; the copper pillars each have a diameter of 5-50 μm; the chip has a pitch of 10-100 μm;; (3) loading the substrate into a bonding machine, , the chip and flipping the chip, such that the copper pillars face outward; to dip the copper pillars in the nano-copper paste; (4) that substrate is loaded in a bonding machine, sucking the chip by a suction nozzle of the bonding machine; (5) feeding a protective gas, (6) aligning the copper pillars respectively with copper pads on the substrate through an optical system of the bonding machine. Regarding element (1), Yamaguchi discloses cleaning a chip and a substrate followed by pretreatment and the pretreatment is acid treatment, plasma treatment, self-assembled monolayer (SAM) or a combination thereof ([0024]). It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was field to perform cleaning a chip and a substrate followed by pretreatment and the pretreatment is acid treatment, plasma treatment, self-assembled monolayer (SAM) or a combination thereof for the purpose of effective application of the conductive paste. Regarding element (2), Balucani discloses wherein the chip has 4-500 copper pillars with input/output (I/O) ports; the copper pillars each have a diameter of 5-50 μm; the chip has a pitch of 10-100 μm ([0036]). It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify CN’772 with Balucani to have the chip has 4-500 copper pillars with input/output (I/O) ports; the copper pillars each have a diameter of 5-50 μm; the chip has a pitch of 10-100 μm for the purpose of making multi-component structures (Balucani, [0036]). Regarding element (3), CN’030 however discloses loading the substrate, the chip and flipping the chip (Figs. 3, 4), such that the copper pillars face outward; to dip the copper pillars in the nano-copper paste (Fig. 2; S102, S103). It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was field to modify CN’772 with CN’030 to perform loading the substrate, the chip and flipping the chip, such that the copper pillars face outward; to dip the copper pillars in the nano-copper paste; for the purpose of manufacturing a copper interconnect structure at reduced cost (CN’030, page 4, paragraph 14). Regarding element (4), Maeda discloses that substrate is loaded in a bonding machine (Fig.1; [0051]), sucking the chip by a suction nozzle of the bonding machine ([0047]; [0053]). It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify CN’772 with Maeda to have substrate is loaded in a bonding machine, sucking the chip by a suction nozzle of the bonding machine for the purpose of performing efficient bonding (Maeda, Abstract). Regarding element (5), Hartmann discloses feeding a protective gas [0035]). It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify CN’772 with Hartmann to feed a protective gas for the purpose of preventing joining members oxidation (Hartmann, [0035]). Regarding element (6), Hayata discloses aligning the copper pillars respectively with copper pads on the substrate through an optical system of the bonding machine ([0094]). It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify CN’772 with Hayata to perform alignment of the copper pillars respectively with copper pads on the substrate through an optical system of the bonding machine for the purpose of improving bonding process. Regarding claim 2, CN’772 discloses the nano-copper particles have a particle size of 100 nm or less; and a mass percentage concentration of the nano-copper particles in the nano-copper paste is 80% or more (“Summary of Invention”, paragraphs 2, 3). Regarding claim 3, CN’772 discloses the solvent is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, terpineol, polyethylene glycol, rosin, acetone, chloroform, cyclohexane, epichlorohydrin, epoxy resin, primary amine, tertiary amine, and a combination thereof; the dispersant is selected from the group consisting of gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, gelatin, polyvinyl imidazolidinone, 1-methylimidazole, 2-methylimidazole, 4-methylimidazole, phenylimidazole, 2-ethylimidazole, and a combination thereof; and the viscosity modifier is selected from the group consisting of methylcellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, primary amine, tertiary amine, acid anhydride and a combination thereof (page 1, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 5, CN’772 does not disclose the suction nozzle of the bonding machine is operated in a closed environment in the presence of the protective gas. Hartmann however discloses that protective gas preventing join members oxidation. It would have been therefore obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to have the suction nozzle of the bonding machine is operated in a closed environment in the presence of the protective gas for the purpose of preventing joining members oxidation (Hartmann, [0035]). Regarding claim 6, Hartman discloses the protective gas is an inert gas; the inert gas is nitrogen ([0035]). Regarding claim 7, CN’772 discloses the bonding is performed at 150-300°C and 0-50 MPa under an ultrasonic frequency of 0-100 kHz (“Embodiment 1”). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the search of the prior art does not disclose or reasonably suggest after step (2), subjecting the chip to nitrogen purging in a vacuum dry box and cold argon plasma treatment at room temperature; wherein a flow rate of the cold argon plasma treatment is 300 sccm as required by claim 4. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIA SLUTSKER whose telephone number is (571)270-3849. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9 am-6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Landau can be reached at 571-272-1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JULIA SLUTSKER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2891
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 02, 2023
Application Filed
May 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672397
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICES, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY PANELS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660531
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING Si-SiC-BASED COMPOSITE STRUCTURE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660226
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652897
INSULATION SHEET FOR DISPLAY LIGHT SOURCE, AND INSULATION LIGHT SOURCE MODULE, INSULATION BACKLIGHT UNIT, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641950
OLED LIGHT-EMITTING UNIT, OLED SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OLED LIGHT-EMITTING UNIT
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month