DETAILED ACTION
Response to Amendment
Receipt is acknowledged of the amendment filed 10/2/2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1, 17-18, and 20 were amended. The previous rejection of claim 18 is withdrawn in view of the amendments.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection in view of US 2019/0027907 (Li).
Claim Objections
Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities:
Line 4 of claim 20 should be correct as follows: “cable is prepared by”.
Appropriate correction is required.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1, 2, 7-9, 12, 13, 15, and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0027907 (Li) in view of US 4,551,915 (Larsson).
Regarding claim 1, Li teaches a method comprising:
preparing a first end of a cable using stress control tubing and stress relief mastic (a first end of cable 201 is prepared as shown in Fig. 3, 3a, and 4 using stress control glue/mastic 110 and insulating body cold shrinking terminal 100; see Figs. 3, 3a, 4; NOTE: while primary reference US 2019/0027907 (Li) recites a “stress control glue 110” at [0041], Li claims priority to CN 105337241 whose machine translation recites a “stress control mastic 110”. Therefore, it is understood by the examiner that a stress control glue is equivalent to a stress control mastic.), wherein preparing the first end of the cable comprises:
removing a cable jacket, a cable semiconductor layer, and a cable insulation layer for the first end of the cable exposing a first portion of the cable insulation layer and a second portion of a conductor at the first end of the cable (a preparation step comprises removing a portion of the outer protection layer 205, semiconductor layer 203, an insulation layer 202 to expose a portion of the insulation layer 202 and the conductor 201; see [0039]; see Fig. 3),
forming a chamfer in the cable semiconductor layer where the cable semiconductor layer and the cable insulation layer meet (an inclined surface 203a is formed which is equivalent to a chamfer as claimed; see Fig. 3, 3a; see [0057], [0061]),
disposing a first relief mastic on the chamfer where the cable semiconductor layer and the cable insulation layer meet (a stress control glue/mastic 110 is formed wherein the inclined surface 203a of semiconductor 203 meets the insulation layer 202; see [0057], [0061]; Fig. 4), and
placing a first stress control tubing over the relief mastic and continue over the exposed cable insulation layer connecting the first end of the cable directly to a high voltage supply (insulating body cold shrinking terminal 100 may be broadly interpreted as a stress controlling tube and is formed over the stress control glue/mastic 110 and insulation layer 202; see Fig. 4).
Li fails to teach testing the cable.
Larsson teaches testing the cable (the terminated cable 10 was subjected to AC discharge and impulse tests; see col. 1, lines 44-col. 2, line 11; col. 4, line 67 – col. 5, line 1).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of testing the cable as taught in Larsson into Li in order to gain the advantage of testing the high-voltage alternating-current cable termination under the IEEE standard test procedure Std. 48-1975 to obtain information on the performance of a high-voltage cable termination.
Regarding claim 2, Li fails to teach wherein preparing the first end of a cable further comprises using insulating tubing. While Li teaches an insulation layer 202 which may broadly be interpreted as a stress control tubing, Li fails to teach a stress control tubing an insulating tubing as require by claim 2.
Larsson teaches wherein preparing the first end of a cable further comprises using insulating tubing (insulating layer 42 in addition to layer 30 of semi-conductive stress control material; see Figs. 1 and 2; see col. 3, line 59-63).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features as taught in Larsson into Li in order to gain the advantage of a stress control material positioned at a point of highest electrical stress using a semiconductive stress grading material with an insulating layer formed over the entire assembly body using heat shrinkable tube to insulate the high-voltage cable.
Regarding claim 7, Li teaches wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a joint (connection terminal 400 would reasonably be used to connect to a high-voltage supply without a joint; See Fig. 4).
Regarding claim 8, Li fails to teach wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a permanent termination.
Larsson teaches wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a permanent termination (connector 24 is a crimped connectors and would not reasonably be interpreted as a permanent termination in view of a broadest reasonable interpretation; see col. 3, lines 24-28).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Larsson into Li in order to gain the advantage of connecting a high-voltage cable to a power supply for testing without the need of a permanent termination to make the connection.
Regarding claims 9 and 16, the combination of Li and Larsson fails to explicitly teach further comprising removing the first end from the cable after testing the cable; and further comprising removing the second end from the cable after testing the cable, however, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art and a matter of common sense to remove a first end or second end from a cable after testing the cable if desired, e.g. in order to provide the cable with a different connector, without requiring any undue experimentation or providing any new or unexpected result.
Regarding claims 12 and 13, the combination of Li and Larsson fails to explicitly teach further comprising: preparing a second end of the cable using stress control tubing and stress relief mastic; and electrically isolating the second end of the cable; and wherein preparing the second end of the cable further comprises using insulating tubing, however, the limitations amount to a mere duplication of what is taught for the first end of the cable in claims 1 and 2. It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use stress control tubing and stress relief mastic on both ends of the cable and isolating the second end of the cable such that both ends of the cable are protected from electric stress at the ends of the shield and allowing the cable to be isolated from ground during a high-voltage test.
Regarding claim 15, the combination of Li and Larsson fails to teach wherein electrically isolating the second end of the cable comprises electrically isolating the second end of the cable without using a joint, however, the limitations as claimed amounts to mere duplication of the features by preparing the second end of the cable according to the same preparation taught in claims 1 and 7 for the first end of the cable.
Claim(s) 3-4, 6, 17-18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0027907 (Li) in view of US 4,551,915 (Larsson), and in further view of US 2024/0068802 (Doedens).
Regarding claims 3-4 and 6, Li fails to teach wherein the high voltage supply provides a Direct Current (DC) voltage; and wherein testing the cable comprises performing a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) withstand test; wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable.
Doedens teaches wherein the high voltage supply provides a Direct Current (DC) voltage; and wherein testing the cable comprises performing a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) withstand test; Regarding claim 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable (high voltage cables may be used in AC and DC applications wherein the insulation quality is determined by AC or DC withstand tests, wherein one of ordinary skill in the art understand a DC withstand test of a high voltage cable requires a high voltage DC supply; see [0008]).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Doedens into Li in order to gain the advantage of performing a DC withstand test for high voltage cables.
Regarding claim 17, Larsson teaches a method comprising:
preparing a first end of a cable using stress control tubing and stress relief mastic, wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable (a first end of cable 201 is prepared as shown in Fig. 3, 3a, and 4 using stress control glue/mastic 110 and insulating body cold shrinking terminal 100; see Figs. 3, 3a, 4; NOTE: while US 2019/0027907 recites a “stress control glue 110” at [0041], the reference claims priority to CN 105337241 whose machine translation recites to “stress control mastic 110”. Therefore, it is understood by the examiner that a stress control glue is equivalent to a stress control mastic.);
removing a cable jacket, a cable semiconductor layer, and a cable insulation layer for the first end of the cable exposing a first portion of the cable insulation layer and a second portion of a conductor at the first end of the cable (a preparation step comprises removing a portion of the outer protection layer 205, semiconductor layer 203, an insulation layer 202 to expose a portion of the insulation layer 202 and the conductor 201; see [0039]; see Fig. 3),
forming a chamfer in the cable semiconductor layer where the cable semiconductor layer and the cable insulation layer meet (an inclined surface 203a is formed which is equivalent to a chamfer as claimed; see Fig. 3, 3a; see [0057], [0061]),
disposing a first relief mastic on the chamfer where the cable semiconductor layer and the cable insulation layer meet (a stress control glue/mastic 110 is formed wherein the inclined surface 203a of semiconductor 203 meets the insulation layer 202; see [0057], [0061]; Fig. 4), and
placing a first stress control tubing over the relief mastic and continue over the exposed cable insulation layer connecting the first end of the cable directly to a high voltage supply (insulating body cold shrinking terminal 100 may be broadly interpreted as a stress controlling tube and is formed over the stress control glue/mastic 110 and insulation layer 202; see Fig. 4).
Li fails to teach wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable; wherein the high voltage supply provides a Direct Current (DC) voltage; wherein the cable comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to a high voltage supply wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a joint; and testing the cable.
Doedens teaches wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable; wherein the high voltage supply provides a Direct Current (DC) voltage (high voltage cables may be used in AC and DC applications wherein the insulation quality is determined by AC or DC withstand tests, wherein one of ordinary skill in the art understand a DC withstand test of a high voltage cable requires a high voltage DC supply; see [0008]).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Doedens into Li in order to gain the advantage of performing a DC withstand test for high voltage cables.
Larsson teaches connecting the first end of the cable directly to a high voltage supply wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a joint (the terminated cable 10 was subjected to AC discharge and impulse tests of different voltages, and one of ordinary skill in the art would understand such tests would require connecting the cable to the test components via connector 24 without a joint; see Figs. 1, 2; see col. 3, lines 24-29; col. 4, line 6 – col. 5, line 25); and
testing the cable (the terminated cable 10 was subjected to AC discharge and impulse tests; see col. 4, line 67 – col. 5, line 1).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Larsson into Li in order to gain the advantage of testing the high-voltage alternating-current cable termination under the IEEE standard test procedure Std. 48-1975 to obtain information on the performance of a high-voltage cable termination.
Regarding claim 18, Li fails to teach wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a permanent termination.
Larsson teaches wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a permanent termination (connector 24 is a crimped connectors and would not reasonably be interpreted as a permanent termination in view of a broadest reasonable interpretation; see col. 3, lines 24-28).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Larsson into Li in order to gain the advantage of connecting a high-voltage cable to a power supply for testing without the need of a permanent termination to make the connection.
Regarding claim 20, the claim is rejected in an equivalent manner as claim 17Larsson teaches an apparatus (arrangement and method to control electrical stress in a region of high electric field strength associated with high voltage equipment, such as cable terminations; see abstract; see col. 1, lines 6-10) comprising:
a first end of a cable prepared using stress control tubing and stress relief mastic (a termination of a HV cable 10 is prepared with a semiconductor stress control layer 30 and mastic layers 36; see Figs. 1 and 2); and
a high voltage supply directly connected to the first end of the cable for testing of the cable wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply without using a joint (the terminated cable 10 was subjected to AC discharge and impulse tests of different voltages, and one of ordinary skill in the art would understand such tests would require connecting the cable to the test components via connector 24 without a joint; see Figs. 1, 2; see col. 3, lines 24-29; col. 4, line 6 – col. 5, line 25).
Larsson fails to teach wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable; wherein the high voltage supply provides a Direct Current (DC) voltage.
Doedens teaches wherein the cable comprises a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) cable; wherein the high voltage supply provides a Direct Current (DC) voltage (high voltage cables may be used in AC and DC applications wherein the insulation quality is determined by AC or DC withstand tests, wherein one of ordinary skill in the art understand a DC withstand test of a high voltage cable requires a high voltage DC supply; see [0008]).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Doedens into Larsson in order to gain the advantage of performing a DC withstand test for high voltage cables.
Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0027907 (Li) in view of US 4,551,915 (Larsson), and in further view of US 3,430,137 (Eager).
Regarding claim 5, Larsson fails to teach wherein the cable is disposed on a reel.
Eager teaches wherein the cable is disposed on a reel (power cables are usually tested on a reel 10; see Fig. 1; see col. 2, lines 38-61).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Eager into Larsson in order to gain the advantage of performing a test for high voltage cables provided on a reel as is known in the art as the cables are commonly provided on a reel after manufacturing.
Claim(s) 10 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 4,551,915 (Larsson) in view of US 5,854,556 (Steennis).
Regarding claim 10, Li fails to teach wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises suspending the first end of the cable from a first insulator.
Steennis teaches wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises suspending the first end of the cable from a first insulator (high-voltage lines are suspended by means of insulators 37; see Fig. 4; see col. 5, lines 17-30).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Steennis into Li in order to gain the advantage of performing a test for high voltage cables which are suspended at the ends by insulators such that the high-voltage line is insulated from ground in a manner known in the art.
Regarding claim 14, the combination of Li, Larsson, and Steennis fails to teach wherein electrically isolating the second end of the cable comprises suspending the second end of the cable from a second insulator, however, the limitation as claimed amounts to duplicating the features of claim 10 for a second end of the cable.
Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0027907 (Li) in view of US 4,551,915 (Larsson) and US 5,854,556 (Steennis), and in further view of US 3,430,137 (Eager).
Regarding claim 11, Larsson fails to teach wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises electrically connecting a conductor at the first end of the cable to the high voltage supply via a jumper.
Eager teaches wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises electrically connecting a conductor at the first end of the cable to the high voltage supply via a jumper (cable 12 is connected to high voltage power supply 26 via lead 15 which may reasonably be interpreted as equivalent to a jumper; see Fig. 1; see col. 2, lines 38-47).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the features of Eager into Larsson in order to gain the advantage of performing a test for high voltage cables wherein the high voltage is supplied from the high voltage supply to the cable by means of a lead wire.
Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0027907 (Li) in view of US 4,551,915 (Larsson) and US 2024/0068802 (Doedens), and in further view of US 5,854,556 (Steennis) and US 3,430,137 (Eager).
Regarding claim 19 Li fails to teach wherein connecting the first end of the cable directly to the high voltage supply comprises: suspending the first end of the cable from a first insulator; and electrically connecting a conductor at the first end of the cable to the high voltage supply via a jumper, however, the claim is rejected in an equivalent manner as claims 10 and 11 above.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892.
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN LEE YENINAS whose telephone number is (571)270-0372. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 10 - 6.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached at (571) 272-2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/STEVEN L YENINAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858