Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/505,131

METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Nov 09, 2023
Examiner
ISAAC, STANETTA D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK Hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
811 granted / 948 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -38% lift
Without
With
+-37.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1005
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 948 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-6, 8, 9, 11-16, 18, and 20-24 in the reply filed on 3/05/26 is acknowledged. Claims 7, 10, 17, and 19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 3/05/26. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 11/09/23. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claims 1, lines 5 and 15, respectively, it is unclear if the “a first cell-periphery structure” is in the “cell region” or is “the first cell-periphery structure in the peripheral region”. In claim 12, lines 12 and 18 respectively, it is unclear if the “a first cell-periphery structure” is in the “cell region” or is “the first cell-periphery structure in the peripheral region”. In claim 21, in line 4, it is unclear if the “a first conductive layer” is included in the patterning of the first region. In addition, it is unclear where is the “first conductive layer” since the forming of “a second conductive line structure by patterning the first and second structures in the second region, when the first structure is only in the first region. For purpose of examination on the merits the examiner will view only the cell region the first cell-periphery structure and the second cell-periphery structure in the peripheral region. In addition, regarding claim 21 the examiner will view the first and second conductive layers to be in first and second regions separately. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 18, and 20-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shin (US PGPub 2012/0153363, hereinafter referred to as “Shin”), IDS reference). Shin discloses the semiconductor method as claimed. See figures 1-3E and corresponding text, where Shin teaches, in claim 1, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: providing a substrate (51) having a cell region and a peripheral region (figure 2; [0019-0026]); forming a first cell-periphery structure (56) including a conductive layer over a surface of the substrate (51); (figure 3D; [0040-0043]) forming a cell bit line trench (70) by patterning the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region; (figure 3D; [0040-0043]) forming a second cell-periphery structure (74) including a second conductive layer over the surface of the substrate (53), wherein the second cell-periphery structure forms a cell bit line structure filling the cell bit line trench (74) in the cell region, and wherein the second cell-periphery structure including the second conductive layer is disposed over the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region (figure 3E; [0045-0048]); and forming a periphery gate structure (62) by patterning the first and second cell-periphery structures in the peripheral region (figures 3B,3D and 3E; [0032-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 2, wherein forming the first cell-periphery structure includes: (figures 3B and 3C; [0032-0039]) forming a dielectric layer (64, 65) over the substrate in the cell region and the peripheral region; and forming the first conductive layer (70) over the dielectric layer. Shin teaches, in claim 4, wherein the first cell-periphery structure further includes a periphery gate dielectric layer (59) formed between the substrate and the first conductive layer in the peripheral region (figures 3B-3E; [0032]). Shin teaches, in claim 8, further comprising performing a planarization process over the second cell-periphery structure after forming the second cell-periphery structure, wherein in the planarization process, the second cell-periphery structure formed outside the cell bit line trench is removed to expose the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 9, further comprising removing the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region after forming the second cell-periphery structure (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 11, further comprising: forming a cell gate structure (56) buried in the substrate (53) in the cell region; and forming a cell contact plug (67) and an interlayer insulation layer (64, 65) surrounding the cell contact plug (67) over the substrate (53) in the cell region, wherein the cell contact plug (67) electrically connects the substrate (53) and the cell bit line (70) structure to each other (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 12, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]) providing a substrate (53) having a cell region and a peripheral region; forming a cell gate structure buried (56) in the substrate (53) in the cell region; forming a cell contact plug (67) and an interlayer insulation layer (64, 65) surrounding the cell contact plug (67) over the substrate (53) in the cell region; forming a first cell-periphery structure (70) including a first conductive layer over a surface of the substrate (53); forming a cell bit line trench (70) exposing the cell contact plug (67) by patterning the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region; forming a second cell-periphery structure (74) including a second conductive layer over the surface of the substrate (53), wherein the second cell-periphery structure forms a cell bit line structure wherein the second cell-periphery structure (74) including the second conductive layer is disposed over the first cell-periphery structure in the peripheral region; and forming a periphery gate structure (62) by patterning the second cell-periphery structures in the peripheral region. Shin teaches, in claim 13, wherein forming the first cell-periphery structure includes: (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]) forming a dielectric layer over the substrate in the cell region and the peripheral region; and forming the first conductive layer over the dielectric layer. Shin teaches, in claim 18, further comprising performing a planarization process over the second cell-periphery structure after forming the second cell-periphery structure, wherein in the planarization process, the second cell-periphery structure formed outside the cell bit line trench is removed to expose the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 20, further comprising forming an interlayer insulation layer over the entire surface of the substrate after removing the first cell-periphery structure in the cell region, wherein forming the periphery gate structure further includes patterning the interlayer insulation layer (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 21, a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, the method comprising: (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]) providing a substrate (53) having a first region and a second region; forming a first structure (70) including a first conductive layer over a surface of the substrate (53); forming a trench by patterning the first structure (70) in the first region; forming a second structure (74) including a second conductive layer over the surface of the substrate (53), wherein the second structure forms a first conductive line structure wherein the second structure (74) including the second conductive layer disposed over the second region. Shin teaches, in claim 22, wherein the first region includes a cell region, and the second region includes a peripheral region (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 23, wherein forming the first conductive line structure includes forming a cell bit line structure in the cell region (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Shin teaches, in claim 24, wherein forming the second conductive line structure includes forming a periphery gate structure in the peripheral region (figures 3A-3E; [0028-0047]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 3, 5, 6, and 14-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin (US PGPub 2012/0153363, hereinafter referred to as “Shin”), IDS reference as applied to claims 1 and 12 above, and further in view of Park et al. (US PGPub 2011/0133283, hereinafter referred to as “Park”). Shin discloses the semiconductor method substantially as claimed. See the rejection above. In addition, Shin shows, in claim 3, [0035], teaches conventional technologies. However, Shin fails to explicitly show, in claim 3, wherein the dielectric layer includes at least one or more of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, aluminum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, and hafnium zirconium oxide; wherein the first conductive layer includes polysilicon. Park teaches, in claim 3, a similar device that includes forming the an interlayer formed of, BoroPhosphoSilicate Glass (BPSG), Spin On Dielectric (SOD) or High Density Plasma (HDP) material insulating layer and polysilicon bit line ([0054], [0059-0060]). In addition, Park provides the advantages of reducing parasitic capacitance [0006],([0060]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate wherein the dielectric layer includes at least one or more of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, aluminum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, and hafnium zirconium oxide; wherein the first conductive layer includes polysilicon, in the method of Shin, according to the teachings of Park, with the motivation of reducing parasitic capacitance. Shin fails to explicitly show, in claim 5, wherein forming the cell bit line structure includes: forming a barrier layer along an inner surface of the cell bit line trench in the cell region; and filling the cell bit line trench in which the barrier layer is formed with the second conductive layer. Park teaches, in claim 5, a similar device that includes forming a barrier layer within to construct a bit line contact plug ([0060],[0066]). In addition, Park provides the advantages of reducing parasitic capacitance [0006],([0060]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate wherein forming the cell bit line structure includes: forming a barrier layer along an inner surface of the cell bit line trench in the cell region; and filling the cell bit line trench in which the barrier layer is formed with the second conductive layer, in the method of Shin, according to the teachings of Park, with the motivation of reducing parasitic capacitance. Shin in view of Park show, in claim 6, wherein the barrier layer includes at least one or more of titanium (Ti), titanium nitride (TiN), tungsten nitride (WN), and tungsten silicon nitride (WSiN), and wherein the second conductive layer includes tungsten (W) ([0060], Park). Shin iteaches, in claim 14, wherein the dielectric layer includes at least one or more of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, aluminum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, and hafnium zirconium oxide, and wherein the first conductive layer includes polysilicon. Park teaches, in claim 14, a similar device that includes forming the an interlayer formed of, BoroPhosphoSilicate Glass (BPSG), Spin On Dielectric (SOD) or High Density Plasma (HDP) material insulating layer and polysilicon bit line ([0054], [0059-0060]). In addition, Park provides the advantages of reducing parasitic capacitance [0006],([0060]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate wherein the dielectric layer includes at least one or more of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, aluminum oxide, hafnium oxide, zirconium oxide, and hafnium zirconium oxide, and wherein the first conductive layer includes polysilicon, in the method of Shin, according to the teachings of Park, with the motivation of reducing parasitic capacitance. Shin fails to explicitly show, in claim 15, wherein forming the cell bit line structure includes: forming a barrier layer along an inner surface of the cell bit line trench in the cell region; and filling the cell bit line trench in which the barrier layer is formed with the second conductive layer. Park teaches, in claim 15, a similar device that includes forming a barrier layer within to construct a bit line contact plug ([0060],[0066]). In addition, Park provides the advantages of reducing parasitic capacitance [0006],([0060]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate wherein forming the cell bit line structure includes: forming a barrier layer along an inner surface of the cell bit line trench in the cell region; and filling the cell bit line trench in which the barrier layer is formed with the second conductive layer, in the method of Shin, according to the teachings of Park, with the motivation of reducing parasitic capacitance. Shin in view of Park shows, in claim 16, wherein the barrier layer includes at least one or more of titanium (Ti), titanium nitride (TiN), tungsten nitride (WN), and tungsten silicon nitride (WSiN), and wherein the second conductive layer includes tungsten (W) [0060], Park). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANETTA D ISAAC whose telephone number is (571)272-1671. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached at 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STANETTA D ISAAC/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 April 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604706
APPARATUS INCLUDING TRANSPARENT MATERIAL FOR TRANSPARENT PROCESS PERFORMANCE AND METHOD USING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604715
ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593714
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING BONDING ENHANCEMENT LAYER AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593496
Multiple Threshold Voltage Implementation Through Lanthanum Incorporation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581981
Method of Forming an Interconnection between an Electric Component and an Electronic Component
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (-37.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 948 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month